Carbureted LSX Forum Carburetors | Carbed Intakes | Carb Tuning Tips for LSX Enthusiasts

New Edelbrock super victor ls3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2013 | 07:58 AM
  #21  
HighspeedLean's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 145
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Clovis,CA
Default

Originally Posted by JRracing
I hope the price is about the same as the other super vic.
Summit quoted me $410 for it, but Edelbrock said it would be the middle of this month before any hit the distributors....nice Christmas present from me, to me this year.

Also, there is a nice color pic of the intake on a motor in the Edelbrock 2014 New Parts catalogue. I would like to know the specs on the 410ci LS3 test mule they used....750hp?
Old 12-04-2013 | 05:54 AM
  #22  
MikeFSKSpeed's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Im planning on buying at least a pallet of these to start. These should be a big hit.
Old 12-04-2013 | 08:05 AM
  #23  
6secNaLs1's Avatar
TECH Regular

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Irving, TX
Default

Originally Posted by MikeFSKSpeed
Im planning on buying at least a pallet of these to start. These should be a big hit.
Any idea when you might get them
Old 12-04-2013 | 10:38 AM
  #24  
fast89stang's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Hardin ky
Default

Yea Mike, i ordered my last one from you with lots of other goodies. I may be looking at these too.
Old 12-04-2013 | 11:20 AM
  #25  
6secNaLs1's Avatar
TECH Regular

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Irving, TX
Default

From what im reading the new super vic is 7.67 carb pad height and the jr is 7.40..not much taller.. I guess the bigger runners etc are the differences
Old 12-04-2013 | 01:10 PM
  #26  
fast89stang's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Hardin ky
Default

Good, at least it will fit under my hood.
Old 12-04-2013 | 03:22 PM
  #27  
Sales@Tick's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Mount Airy, NC
Default

The L92 "Victor" intake is nowhere near a Victor Junior in terms of carb pad height, resulting plenum volume and CSA of the runners.

The L92 "Victor" is basically a souped up Vic. Jr.

Probably why there isn't much difference.
Old 12-04-2013 | 03:52 PM
  #28  
fast89stang's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Hardin ky
Default

In your opinion Martin, do you feel a swap might be worth some gain? My car is cam only, but this motor seems to love rpm's. Moving shift points from 64 to 68 gives almost 1.5 more mph.
Old 12-04-2013 | 03:53 PM
  #29  
James@ShorTuning's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dyno Tuning in KY
Default

Bout time! Finally giving the LS guys a TB/Carb flange large enough to support real power!

They still need to make a 4500 flanged EFI cathedral port super victor.
Old 12-04-2013 | 06:07 PM
  #30  
ATwelveSec02Z28's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by fast89stang
In your opinion Martin, do you feel a swap might be worth some gain? My car is cam only, but this motor seems to love rpm's. Moving shift points from 64 to 68 gives almost 1.5 more mph.
I would say no... Mainly because you wont have the valvetrain stability to max the RPM potential of this intake....

The valve springs needed to control the valve properly (at RPM) would probably push the limits on the stock rockers, pushrods and lifters
Old 12-04-2013 | 08:40 PM
  #31  
fast89stang's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Hardin ky
Default

I shift at almost 7k now.......I have shifted as high as 73, the springs and all were matched thru my cam guy. Maybe youre right, but it says the rpm range is 45-7500, right? I know i can shift at 7 all day long and if I spin, I just turn it up higher and can still run my dial.
Old 12-04-2013 | 09:28 PM
  #32  
6togo's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Harford co. MD
Default

Anyone know if Edelbrock has LS7 victors on the horizon?
Old 12-04-2013 | 10:46 PM
  #33  
HighspeedLean's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 145
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Clovis,CA
Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
The L92 "Victor" intake is nowhere near a Victor Junior in terms of carb pad height, resulting plenum volume and CSA of the runners.

The L92 "Victor" is basically a souped up Vic. Jr.

Probably why there isn't much difference.
I don't have a Vic Jr., so I don't know.


Didn't think a Jr. was this tall......?
Old 12-04-2013 | 10:48 PM
  #34  
VLS1's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Victor Jr L92 is 5.94" carb pad height apparently???
Old 12-05-2013 | 02:13 AM
  #35  
6secNaLs1's Avatar
TECH Regular

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Irving, TX
Default

Originally Posted by VLS1
Victor Jr L92 is 5.94" carb pad height apparently???
Thought it was 6.4
Old 12-05-2013 | 03:29 AM
  #36  
VLS1's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was only going on previous posts I had read elsewhere, so I just unboxed a new L92 Victor JR to check for myself. Almost exactly 15cm with the only damn (metric) tape measure I could find in the house, so right around 5.90" at centre of manifold measured from the side.
Old 12-05-2013 | 04:08 AM
  #37  
dmracing's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (81)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,280
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
From: HERE
Default

L92 Jr carb height is 7.400 inches
Old 12-05-2013 | 05:36 AM
  #38  
VLS1's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dmracing
L92 Jr carb height is 7.400 inches
That measurement edelbrock used is from the valley face apparently, the actual manifold height is just under 6" and the super victor in the above pic is definitely a lot taller than the JR intake.

Last edited by VLS1; 12-05-2013 at 05:47 AM.
Old 12-05-2013 | 08:11 AM
  #39  
dmracing's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (81)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,280
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
From: HERE
Default

Originally Posted by VLS1
That measurement edelbrock used is from the valley face apparently, the actual manifold height is just under 6" and the super victor in the above pic is definitely a lot taller than the JR intake.
Theyre both measured from valley flange
Old 12-05-2013 | 03:34 PM
  #40  
VLS1's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dmracing
Theyre both measured from valley flange
Yeah and I still think that this is most likely a typo in the Victor Jr case, as that red manifold displayed above is considerably taller even just going by the picture alone.


Quick Reply: New Edelbrock super victor ls3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.