Chevrolet Camaro 1967-2002 The forum for diehard Camaro fans

Purchase 1995 LT1 Camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2004, 10:07 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Midnghtstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1995 LT1 or 2000 LS1 Camaro?

I am looking at a 1995 LT1 A4 Camaro convertible with 66k miles on the clock. The dealer is asking $11,900 for it but I am going to try and get it below $10,000. The car seems very clean, was traded in for a new truck.
Questions:
1) What is a fair price for the car?

2) I will be using this as a daily driver (mostly highway miles), and wondering how dependable the motor and car is? Will put about 16k miles a year on it and dont plan on modding it.

3)I found a 2000 camaro ls1 for about 12k with 65k miles. Would this be a better choice? I actually like the way the 1995 model looks but more concerned with reliability. Is LT1 just as reliable as LS1


--Thanks..

Last edited by Midnghtstar; 04-17-2004 at 10:23 AM. Reason: Change title
Old 04-17-2004, 06:20 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
Just Floor It's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Newport News, Va
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Id go with the LS1.....Faster, plus the LT1 sounds a little High IMO....
Old 04-17-2004, 06:21 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
Just Floor It's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Newport News, Va
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Also, You dont have to worry about the Optispark with an LS1
Old 04-17-2004, 08:34 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Midnghtstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Just Floor It
Also, You dont have to worry about the Optispark with an LS1
Look like I will be getting a 2002 A4 LS1 I found today for $17,300 with 28,500 miles, eibach springs and upgraded stereo system. Buying it from a dealer that I have bought from before. Pretty decent deal I think.
Old 04-17-2004, 09:03 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
Just Floor It's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Newport News, Va
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

cool!
Old 04-18-2004, 02:12 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
Vendetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC metro area
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Just Floor It
Faster, plus the LT1 sounds a little High IMO....
Sorry man, but you're wrong on that one. Iron blocks sound lower, deeper, and growl. Aluminum blocks sound more high pitched, and they scream. Both sound awesome in their own way, but LT1s sound more low-pitched almost every time. Download the vid of my car if you want, and check out the exhaust.
Old 04-19-2004, 06:25 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
redz_02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

yeah the sound difference between an ls1 and lt1 is night and day different. Lt1's have alot more rumble while ls1's are raspy higher pitched, has to do with materials and fireing order. Have QTP LT's with off road y and borla and it gets pretty raspy down low. It sounds like a damn dragster at full throttle up top though. Lt1's just overall sound the best it's a known fact in f-bodies. Damn if you wanted an ls1 i was selling mine for 18,500 with TTII's and about 4 grand in mods along with fully optioned.
Old 04-23-2004, 03:53 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
LT1FUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by enisguy
Sorry man, but you're wrong on that one. Iron blocks sound lower, deeper, and growl. Aluminum blocks sound more high pitched, and they scream. Both sound awesome in their own way, but LT1s sound more low-pitched almost every time. Download the vid of my car if you want, and check out the exhaust.
I may be wrong, but when he said the LT1 "sounds high", I think he meant the price? That's how I read it anyway.

Afterall, everyone knows the LT1 > LS1 in the sound department!
Old 04-23-2004, 04:55 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Camaroholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I read it as 'priced high' too. Yeah, 12k for a 95 is HIGH. I paid just slightly more than that for my '98... Almost three years ago.

An 95 with 66k should probably be closer to $8k. Of course, dealer's tryin' to turn a fast buck. The longer it sits on the lot, the lower the price.
Old 04-23-2004, 05:39 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
Vendetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC metro area
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Ahh... you guys are right. I took it literally

12k is definitely too high for any LT1 F-Body unless its got <20k miles on it
Old 05-03-2004, 01:05 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
rucr95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i paid 7500 for my 95 Z28 w/ 67000 miles on it.
Old 05-03-2004, 02:53 PM
  #12  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
TSAEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 419
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i paid 6000...high miles...but came with over 2000 grand in extras...as for "reliability" i think both are great...but ever car can have its day...my sis has more prob with her 02 ram air than I do with my 93 z...but every one is different.
Old 05-03-2004, 03:32 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
Vendetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC metro area
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i'm selling my supercharged LT1 if you want it... i'll give you a better price than both those cars



Quick Reply: Purchase 1995 LT1 Camaro?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 AM.