View Poll Results: Is Chevy Destroying The SS Name?
Yes
487
68.11%
No
153
21.40%
Who Cares?
75
10.49%
Voters: 715. You may not vote on this poll
Chevy Destroying The SS Name?
#21
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
The thing is this isn't the 60's or early 70's. There aren't dozens of V8 powered, rwd cars in the GM lineup - nor any manufacturers lineup. Times change. It's a fact of life.
Oh, and 10 years ago there was a SS-badged Chevrolet. The S10 SS was available in 95.
Oh, and 10 years ago there was a SS-badged Chevrolet. The S10 SS was available in 95.
#22
Originally Posted by Camaroz
it's AWD 400HP what else do u need ***** sake get over it man S-Curves i think it will perform very well so do me a favor and shut the hell up
This is my opinion, you can take, leave, or smoke it... doesn't really matter to me, but I'll not "shut the hell up" just because you don't agree with it.
#23
Originally Posted by DMNSPD
Oh, and 10 years ago there was a SS-badged Chevrolet. The S10 SS was available in 95.
#24
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by PredatorZ
That's funny! Somehow I knew you would find an SS that existed 10 years ago. I still said "car" but you do have a point, times have changed so I guess we'll all just have to get used to it.
#26
well the thing is with SVT and SRT, those have been around for 12 years (SVT) and 10 years (SRT), not real sure how long Dodge has had srt, unless you include R/T. But what i think this thread was getting at is the history behind the SS line. goes all the way back to 67' or so. thats a long time, and when it was first used it was on all the american muscle, not on a pinto with 100hp! they are all defined differently. Special Vehicales Team just makes a better car from the base model, so it is "Special". dont know what the hell SRT stands for, but as far as Super Sport goes, if i look at a car and it does not look SUPERSPORT to me than it should not have the badge!
#28
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rockland County, NY
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 97cobra
well the thing is with SVT and SRT, those have been around for 12 years (SVT) and 10 years (SRT), not real sure how long Dodge has had srt, unless you include R/T. But what i think this thread was getting at is the history behind the SS line. goes all the way back to 67' or so. thats a long time, and when it was first used it was on all the american muscle, not on a pinto with 100hp! they are all defined differently. Special Vehicales Team just makes a better car from the base model, so it is "Special". dont know what the hell SRT stands for, but as far as Super Sport goes, if i look at a car and it does not look SUPERSPORT to me than it should not have the badge!
#29
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by 01SSDRVR
I dont see what there is to complain about, 10 years ago Chevy didnt have 1 SS car.
Originally Posted by PredatorZ
10 years ago there was no SS car because there wasn't a car worthy of the SS title, and that is the way it should be.
Impala SS if you forgot. That was actually quite worthy of the name. Also I do believe the SS Camaro was out. I remember a LT1 SS, but can't remember if it was 1996 or 1997 when it started.
#30
Originally Posted by Camaroz
Think of it this way PredatorZ what other SUV out there come's with 400HP and AWD and with a LS2 motor it will respond well to mods
I have a question though, how come there has never been a Corvette SS? Or has there DMNSPD?
#32
TECH Veteran
Super Sports history website: http://chevysupersports.com/SShistory.htm
Says the SS Camaros were from 1967-1972 and 1996-(2002).
Says the SS Camaros were from 1967-1972 and 1996-(2002).
#33
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by PredatorZ
I have a question though, how come there has never been a Corvette SS? Or has there DMNSPD?
Chevrolet SS Vehicles
Impala SS ~ 1961 - 1969/1994 - 1996/2004 - 2006
Nova SS ~ 1963 - 1976
Chevelle SS ~ 1964 - 1973
Camaro SS ~ 1967 - 1972/1996 - 2002
El Camino SS ~ 1968 - 1987
Monte Carlo SS ~ 1970 - 1971/1983 - 1988/2000 - 2006
C1500 454SS ~ 1990 - 1993
S10 SS ~ 1994 - 1998
Silverado SS ~ 2003 - 2005
SSR ~ 2003 - 2005
Cobalt SS ~ 2005
Mailbu SS ~ 2006
Trailblazer SS ~ 2006
#35
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree that the name is being ruined. I think it started with the SSr particularly. I can't stand the truck/car and I also think the Cobalt, Malibu and Trailblazer fall into the same unworthy category. Like mentioned above by others...the term means Super Sport and when I think of that, I relate it to Sports Cars. And a Cobalt is a compact commuter car, Malibu a family sedan and Trailblazer a soccer mom SUV...no matter the HP ratings. I am a fan of trucks in general, so I'm biased in liking the Silverado SS (not it's name though). Along with the other cars, I think GM has done a good job with the SS models, but they should be named something besides SS. It just seems to add to the uniqueness and specialty of owning an SS.
#38
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Fairless Hills, PA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PredatorZ
I'm with juju here... SS should not just be stamped on a car because it happens to be an improvement over the baseline model. This is an elite badge that should be reserved for 8cyl RWD at a minimum and only for SPORTS CARS, not sport compacts or God forbid SUV's!! I don't care how much horsepower you put in a Trailblazer, its still just a truck that will never keep up with my Z through the S-curves, it doesn't rate an "SS".
Trailblazer SS is faster than all three of your cars stock vs. stock and probably handles just as well or better. As well as the Trailblazer beating probably every SS from 1967-1990.
Trailblazer 0-60 5.8 sec 14.?
1992 Z28 6.7 0-60 15 sec 1/4
1988 IROC-Z 0-60 7 sec 15.5 1/4
1968 Coupe 0-60 8 sec 15.4 1/4
#39
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by slvrchr203
Trailblazer SS is faster than all three of your cars stock vs. stock and probably handles just as well or better. As well as the Trailblazer beating probably every SS from 1967-1990.
Trailblazer 0-60 5.8 sec 14.?
1992 Z28 6.7 0-60 15 sec 1/4
1988 IROC-Z 0-60 7 sec 15.5 1/4
1968 Coupe 0-60 8 sec 15.4 1/4
Trailblazer 0-60 5.8 sec 14.?
1992 Z28 6.7 0-60 15 sec 1/4
1988 IROC-Z 0-60 7 sec 15.5 1/4
1968 Coupe 0-60 8 sec 15.4 1/4
#40
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I could care less how fast the Trailblazer is... it could have a 454 and I still don't think it would be deserving of the SS badge... it is an SUV PEOPLE. I can't wait to see the Explorer Cobra or the Explorer GT ;-)