brp vs edelbrock?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

03-22-2009, 03:33 PM

#41

SkylarkLS1

Staging Lane

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jan 2009

Posts: 63

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by obfpd172

After reading the post I am still confused on what combination will work in my 64 chevelle. It sounds like the f-body oil pan will not work, but maybe a cts oil pan will. Is this right. This is for the Edelbrock mounts. I have a 99 ls1 from a camaro with all the accessories. Can anyone confirm this

The f-body pan will not work, it will hit your crossmember. My 64 is going with edelbrock adapter plates with edelbrock headers and milodon oil pan. Everyone goes different routes lh8/autokraft/S&P modified. If you are using edelbrock plates go off their recommendation. There was a tech from Edelbrock on here I forgot his User ID however..Someone can chime in

Reply Like

03-23-2009, 05:16 AM

#42

rocco T

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2009

Posts: 9

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

G bod

Ok, so for my 85 Monte SS....is it the same thoughts with BRP or do I go with someone else?

Reply Like

10-26-2009, 08:28 PM

#43

pushrod36

On The Tree

Join Date: Jul 2009

Location: Richmond, VA

Posts: 122

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Confused about what fits

Has anyone used the CTS-V oil pan with the edelbrock kit in a 68-72 pontiac? I feel like I saw on the forums that some people have, but the guy at edelbrock told me that he tried that pan and it did not fit. I would like to use the autokraft pan, but I have been waiting for over a month and the guy is back ordered. I would like to avoid the milidon pan because it is expensive and doesn't seem to have the level of engineering to justify its price.