Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1973 RS Camaro LSX Swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2013 | 07:15 PM
  #941  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by tom70
when you program your own timing can you leave map unplugged? your right don't want any timing issues. bought used box didnt get software. have to call msd. soon as i can fgure out how to load pics. ill start post. just rememer its ultmate budget.lol car maks its living a 1/4 mile at a time.
Yeah, you don't have to use the map sensor at all. It's completely optional. I'm pretty sure you can download the MSD software free from their website. The easiest way to post pics is to set up a free photobucket account, upload the pics there, and then use the IMG links to post them here. Good luck.
Old 04-09-2013 | 07:34 PM
  #942  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Just a minor update. I went back to the track Sunday to do some ignition timing tuning on the motor (NA). This was something that I should have done long ago, but I could no longer put it off after seeing just how much timing my combo liked pulled on a small 100hp shot of nitrous. I typically run 34* total timing on the motor and the 100hp tune up ran best with seven degrees pulled from that. To me, that seemed like a lot of timing to need pulled......unless that 34* was too high on the motor.

So.....I made a baseline run at my normal 34*, followed by a pass at 32* and 30*. The results are below.

Name:  IMAG0706_zpsed0d71fe.jpg
Views: 85
Size:  57.7 KB

Based on the MPH from each pass it would appear that there wasn't much difference in power production between 34* and 30*. But the weather was also warming up a good bit between these runs with the coolest time being during the 34* pass and the warmest being during the 30* pass. So after correcting for the weather (DA), the best corrected MPH was actually achieved at 30*. This kind of stuff drive me crazy because I'd like to trust the science and keep my timing at 30* but it's hard for me to see a lower 1/8th mile MPH on that slip and go with it....LOL. So I guess I'm going to have to repeat this testing on another day when the weather is a little more stable. Maybe I need to wait and test in the middle of the afternoon.

I guess the good news in all of this is that the car achieved all new NA bests in the 60', 1/8 mile and 1/4 mile ET and MPH.
Old 04-09-2013 | 07:40 PM
  #943  
1961ba427's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
From: Milledgeville, GA
Default

Not accounting for weather or DA changes or any of that stuff...... I like the 32* run the best.
Old 04-09-2013 | 07:46 PM
  #944  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by 1961ba427
Not accounting for weather or DA changes or any of that stuff...... I like the 32* run the best.
Yeah, I agree. It's the best 1/8th mph, best 1/4 mph any only slightly off in the ET in both places due to being slightly off in the 60'. I wasn't gonna say....but 32* is where I left it for now until I have time to test it again. This was based on how good the slip looks at face value, plus the fact that it likes 27* on a 100hp N2O hit makes sense since that's pulling 5 from 32.
Old 04-09-2013 | 07:49 PM
  #945  
speedtigger's Avatar
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 8,830
Likes: 68
From: Florida
Default

I say keep testing. Keep moving the timing in both directions until it drops of notably. Then you will know more.

I don't know if your track has test and tune in the evenings, but that is when I like to test because the temps tend to stay more consistent although the humidity tends it rise as the evening goes on.
Old 04-09-2013 | 07:58 PM
  #946  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
I say keep testing. Keep moving the timing in both directions until it drops of notably. Then you will know more.

I don't know if your track has test and tune in the evenings, but that is when I like to test because the temps tend to stay more consistent although the humidity tends it rise as the evening goes on.
Unfortunately, as the season goes on at MIR it seems the test and tune sessions get few and further in between. I may have to look into Richmond Dragway but I hear it's a bit of a dump. VIR has a good reputation but it's about 120 miles away. I have some closer 1/8th mile tracks but I don't feel good testing much more than 60' time on an 1/8th mile track. Gains should show up in the 1/8th MPH but I feel like they'd be more pronouced in the 1/4.
Old 04-09-2013 | 08:07 PM
  #947  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
I say keep testing. Keep moving the timing in both directions until it drops of notably. Then you will know more.

I don't know if your track has test and tune in the evenings, but that is when I like to test because the temps tend to stay more consistent although the humidity tends it rise as the evening goes on.
Yours seems to like lower timing numbers, right? I think I saw you recently posted it liked 29 with blended fuel? I know yours is a cathedral headed motor and higher compression, but that makes me curious.
Old 04-09-2013 | 08:20 PM
  #948  
speedtigger's Avatar
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 8,830
Likes: 68
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by GC99TA
Yours seems to like lower timing numbers, right? I think I saw you recently posted it liked 29 with blended fuel? I know yours is a cathedral headed motor and higher compression, but that makes me curious.
Yeah. Mine likes 27 to 28 degrees on pump gas. But, after reading a lot of threads, I have the impression that the square port motors like more timing in general. Mine also has 10.9:1 compression. What is yours?
Old 04-09-2013 | 08:33 PM
  #949  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
Yeah. Mine likes 27 to 28 degrees on pump gas. But, after reading a lot of threads, I have the impression that the square port motors like more timing in general. Mine also has 10.9:1 compression. What is yours?
Yeah, we probably read some of the same threads on the topic and I think it was Barrett's testing with his LY6 that finally convinced me to set mine at 34 as a starting point and I just never moved it until now since the car seemed to meet my expectations. GM rates the LY6 at 9.67:1 so I usually call it 9.7. Either way, it's more than a full point less than your LQ9 so that has to be a factor.
Old 07-07-2013 | 08:23 AM
  #950  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

I finally made it out to a local 1/8th mile track (Summerduck) to try out a 63 N2O jet (~150hp). My real curiosity was whether or not the car would hook the full shot directly off the trans brake with no progressive controller. Well, the good news is that it did hook it. But the bad new is, it's only because it was down on power due to weather conditions.

The weather has been hot and humid. Friday at the track it was hovering near 90* with 80% or more humidity. That put the DA around 2300ft above sea level (track is 300ft actual). During my last trips to the track I was running in negative DA all day.

So, bottom line, the car was faster on the 53 jet in great weather than it was on the 63 jet in crap weather. Friday the car ran three passes, all were 6.60's @ 102 with high 1.4 to low 1.5 60' times. Last time out the car was going 6.40's (one 6.36) at mostly 104 (one 106) with 60's in the low 1.4s (one 1.39).

So all in all I can't complain given that Friday was representative of the hottest weather I'll probably ever run in. But it still leaves the question of whether the car will hook a 63 jet in good weather. I'm looking for some low 1.3 short times!
Old 07-07-2013 | 09:47 AM
  #951  
JMac11's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default Retard timing in High gear only

Not sure if your electronics support it, but if you can retard your timing post high gear shift, MPH will go up and ET will drop. I did this with switch on my shifter, MSD box setup on a bracket car years ago. It should help with you NO2 also
Old 07-07-2013 | 09:54 AM
  #952  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by JMac11
Not sure if your electronics support it, but if you can retard your timing post high gear shift, MPH will go up and ET will drop. I did this with switch on my shifter, MSD box setup on a bracket car years ago. It should help with you NO2 also
Yeah, I wish I could. The MSD 6012 box only has one retard function. I could set that up on a switch to pull extra timing in high gear NA, but it's the only retard funciton I have for nitrous (unless I want to load a different lower timing map before a nitrous run; then I could do as stated above). May be worth playing with a little.

You can also advance/retard timing using the MAP sensor input to the MSD. If I could figure out a way to "trick" that input I may be able to pull additional timing that way.....hmmm.
Old 07-07-2013 | 07:22 PM
  #953  
turbodarryl's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Default

Very Very NICE car!, i can't wait to get my LS installed in my 73 2nd gen :-)
Old 07-08-2013 | 05:18 PM
  #954  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by turbodarryl
Very Very NICE car!, i can't wait to get my LS installed in my 73 2nd gen :-)
Thanks man.
Old 07-09-2013 | 12:40 PM
  #955  
turbodarryl's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Default

Hey Gary this is my project over at Nasty, http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=259266
Old 07-09-2013 | 12:41 PM
  #956  
Jimbo1367's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,927
Likes: 607
Default

Gary,
So as it sits now, what car is quicker at the track? Camaro or Trans am?
Old 07-09-2013 | 03:06 PM
  #957  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by turbodarryl
Hey Gary this is my project over at Nasty, http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=259266
Cool, your car is looking great and nastyz28 is a great resource for all things second gen. I used to have a build thread going over there too but I stopped updating it when it started to seem like most of the guys there were losing interest in it.....and let's face it, we maintain these threads to get to share ideas and interact with other like-minded people. Many of the nastyz28 members are "purists" and don't want to see the cars modified far from stock. Most of the LS-swappers over there seem be mainly interested in pro-touring style cars with fuel injection, power steering and A/C (I don't have any......LOL), and the drag racers on the site seem to be mostly into SBCs and BBC. ^^^^^All of those are great things, but I'm not sure what I've done with my car quite fit in.......LOL. Here's my old thread though: http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=170213

I'll definitely be checking in on your car though. I hadn't logged in over there in over a year and I still remembered my screen name and password!
Old 07-09-2013 | 03:13 PM
  #958  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by Jimbo1367
Gary,
So as it sits now, what car is quicker at the track? Camaro or Trans am?
That's a good question Jim. As they both sit right now, motor for motor it would be a dang good race, but I think the Camaro would take the stripe. I think the Camaro is about a tenth quicker in similar weather conditions.

On nitrous I have no idea.......but I'd probably still have to give it to the Camaro. But I never really got a good nitrous pass in the TA the way it sits right now. It always seemed to be something. If I had a full bottle and good tires, the track conditions wouldn't be there. If the track was right and the tires were fresh, my bottle would be mysteriously empty (I learned later I had a leaky bottle valve). If all three things were right......I'd break something (transmission, rear, driveshaft.....etc). So at least I can say the Camaro reliably goes down the track on the spray. That alone gives it the win in my book.

And for what it's worth, I'm in the process of changing the TA up a little anyway. I'm gonna put the sway bars back on, along with some creature comforts and some 18 inch wheels and make it more of a street cruiser again. I want to take it on Power Tour next year and don't want to do it the way it sits.
Old 07-09-2013 | 03:32 PM
  #959  
hardbones's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: Illinois, as close to "Normal" as I can get...
Default

Originally Posted by turbodarryl
Hey Gary this is my project over at Nasty, http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=259266
Gary I just put your car in my subscriptions over at the NastyZ so you need to update it!

The Nasty Z is a good place, not as busy as this forum but still a great bunch of guys!
Darryl I have been watching your thread for a while over there and your car is coming along great! I had a long thread on my big block 73 Camaro over there that I just sold http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=230565
I dont really have much on the T/A I just bought since its such a low mile car and I am going too keep the mods to a minumum, just drive the car and enjoy having something with A/C that gets better than 8mpg and doesnt leave me stranded on the side of the road!
Old 07-09-2013 | 03:52 PM
  #960  
GC99TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 3
From: Central VA
Default

Originally Posted by hardbones
Gary I just put your car in my subscriptions over at the NastyZ so you need to update it!
Thanks man, I've actually been thinking about going back over there and at least bringing things back up to date a bit. I guess I'll have get on it.

Originally Posted by hardbones
The Nasty Z is a good place, not as busy as this forum but still a great bunch of guys!
I hope I didn't sound like I was bashing the site or any of it's members. Nothing could be further from the truth. I got a lot of great info from there and interacted with a lot of great guys; even bought and sold some parts. Guess I just felt like I was drifting away from the core audience with my carb'd LS "drag car".....LOL. I really do need to check back in over there.


Quick Reply: 1973 RS Camaro LSX Swap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM.