Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS1 camshaft in a 5.3 LM4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2020, 12:03 PM
  #21  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,108
Received 464 Likes on 350 Posts
Default

So some folks are gonna say - yeah, it's worth it. Some will say - no, it ain't worth it. Some will say - it depends on how you're using the car/truck and what your expectations are. The tests were done on an LM7 with a spring upgrade - a requirement if you want to leverage the cam upgrade.

At the end of the day -- you're gonna have to decide what YOU think and then make a choice - there's data in the test. But others' subjective opinions are useful too, provided you understand they're subjective.
The following users liked this post:
Cameron Condy (04-07-2020)
Old 04-05-2020, 01:03 PM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,053
Received 3,078 Likes on 2,397 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cameron Condy
I’m not very rehearsed in cam specs, I can see that it’s better just not sure how much. He’s selling LS1 springs with it.
Those springs will work for now, though you might want to upgrade to LS2/3 springs as they are a little stiffer and will do a better job.
The following users liked this post:
Cameron Condy (04-07-2020)
Old 04-08-2020, 08:12 AM
  #23  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (34)
 
Scoggin Dickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

We tested our cams in an older 5.3 a few weeks back. Dyno videos and results in our most recent post
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...camshafts.html
__________________

800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice


The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (04-08-2020)
Old 04-09-2020, 05:50 PM
  #24  
Staging Lane
 
Josh Beverly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 76
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/ls-cam-test-comparison/
Old 04-09-2020, 06:15 PM
  #25  
Teching In
 
JS172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Lawng Oisland, NY
Posts: 20
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If I remember right, the Schwartz Vega ran an LS1 intake with LS6 cam, lighter springs, a 98-02 Camaro 75mm intake and computer. It was alleged to have 400 hp but I’m not sure of that’s whether it was at the flywheel or at the tires.
Old 04-09-2020, 07:17 PM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,053
Received 3,078 Likes on 2,397 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JS172
If I remember right, the Schwartz Vega ran an LS1 intake with LS6 cam, lighter springs, a 98-02 Camaro 75mm intake and computer. It was alleged to have 400 hp but I’m not sure of that’s whether it was at the flywheel or at the tires.
Which LS6 cam? The early one is 204/211 .525/.525, 116 LSA, while the late one is 204/218, .551/.547, 117.5 LSA.
The early one is much preferred for 5.3 use because it has more low end torque. Likely because of the tighter LSA
Old 04-09-2020, 07:37 PM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
 
68Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 661
Received 348 Likes on 238 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JS172
If I remember right, the Schwartz Vega ran an LS1 intake with LS6 cam, lighter springs, a 98-02 Camaro 75mm intake and computer. It was alleged to have 400 hp but I’m not sure of that’s whether it was at the flywheel or at the tires.
You remember incorrectly, it was an LS7 camshaft.

https://www.schwartzperformance.com/...e-flying-turd/
The following 2 users liked this post by 68Formula:
G Atsma (04-09-2020), JS172 (04-12-2020)
Old 04-09-2020, 07:43 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
 
68Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 661
Received 348 Likes on 238 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JS172
If I remember right, the Schwartz Vega ran an LS1 intake with LS6 cam, lighter springs, a 98-02 Camaro 75mm intake and computer. It was alleged to have 400 hp but I’m not sure of that’s whether it was at the flywheel or at the tires.
You remember incorrectly, it was an LS7 camshaft.

https://www.schwartzperformance.com/...e-flying-turd/

Will make over 400hp, at significant loss of torque. https://www.hotrod.com/articles/ls-cam-test-comparison/
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (04-09-2020)
Old 04-09-2020, 10:03 PM
  #29  
Teching In
 
JS172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Lawng Oisland, NY
Posts: 20
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 68Formula
You remember incorrectly, it was an LS7 camshaft.

https://www.schwartzperformance.com/...e-flying-turd/

Will make over 400hp, at significant loss of torque. https://www.hotrod.com/articles/ls-cam-test-comparison/
Looking at LS7 vs. LM7 in the Hot Rod article, it seems the LS7 cam didn’t lose torque, went from 384 to 395 ft/lbs.
Old 04-09-2020, 11:31 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,053
Received 3,078 Likes on 2,397 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JS172
Looking at LS7 vs. LM7 in the Hot Rod article, it seems the LS7 cam didn’t lose torque, went from 384 to 395 ft/lbs.
That's peak torque. It lost a bunch of torque from the bottom half of the curve.
Read the article.
The following users liked this post:
68Formula (04-09-2020)
Old 04-10-2020, 03:52 PM
  #31  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,108
Received 464 Likes on 350 Posts
Default

What???? You mean there's other stuff going on that might be important in a street car besides what's happening at peak? ( Chuckle )
The following users liked this post:
68Formula (04-11-2020)



Quick Reply: LS1 camshaft in a 5.3 LM4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.