Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2014, 11:28 PM
  #201  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (21)
 
Verz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sell the s400 huh...you have my number if you want o shoot me a price
Old 07-12-2014, 12:20 AM
  #202  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,952
Received 725 Likes on 532 Posts

Default

New turbo makes a bit more power. Harder to get it to light off though. At 24lbs I managed an 8.94@157.6 with a crappo 1.47 60'. Also trapped 159 @ 25lbs creeping to 26 the last 100rpm or so. Thats shifting at 6k and 6200 through the traps.

Need this sucker to 60' and I could be mid 8's!

Still on the cheap china 32x12x3 IC as well. A treadstone IC is on the way. We'll see how much power that thing is eating up.
Attached Thumbnails 79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-8.94-157.jpg   79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-9.00-159.jpg  

Last edited by Forcefed86; 07-12-2014 at 01:18 AM.
Old 07-12-2014, 06:31 AM
  #203  
On The Tree
 
68II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very impressive what you are accomplishing with this setup, look forward to the treadstone test to see if it's really worth the extra money considering it's Chinese also.
Old 07-12-2014, 01:42 PM
  #204  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,952
Received 725 Likes on 532 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 68II
Very impressive what you are accomplishing with this setup, look forward to the treadstone test to see if it's really worth the extra money considering it's Chinese also.
Thanks! I think my "T" merge hotside is holding back a decent amount of power as well, Compared to what others are doing in heavier cars I'm still down on power quite a bit from them.

The pressure drop across the cores is what seems to be the big factor. Ive heard as high at 5psi across my core at 18lbs. My current IAT temp is great IMO. I started at 120 and was at 160 or so @ 25lbs by the end of the 1/4 last night.

If I can get the time I'll toss on a gauge pre-IC and see how this core is performing.

Treadstone claims...

1469 CFM flow rate, 1000hp efficient, 1.5psi drop
http://www.treadstoneperformance.com...cooler++1000HP
Old 07-12-2014, 09:33 PM
  #205  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Great times!
Old 07-14-2014, 10:02 AM
  #206  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,952
Received 725 Likes on 532 Posts

Default

I broke it!

Managed to take my HG/head out Saturday. I just don’t think these tiny zero overlap cams can take the timing.

Blew it at 17* and 25psi. 50/50 water meth, IAT was under 160*, with the intercooler. Tune in the logs looked spot on. 11.0 AFR all through the run. Same tune up/boost as the night before where I was trapping 159. Had just installed cooler plugs in the morning went from a NGK7 to a autolite race 8 with the side gapped electrode. Blew it first pass. Plug looks like new, no signs of detonation on the plug or piston face.

Couple theories. Once I got the car home I noticed the lower radiator hose was worn through where it rubbed the crank pulley. I suppose this could have ruptured first, blew the coolant and then the head overheated and let loose.

I’d assume a more likely event was the HG blew, pressurized the **** out of the cooling system causing the hose to move up into the pulley taking it out. It was always within 2” of the pulley, but never noticed it touching and had it secured with some cable ties. Coolant was at 180* at the start of the pass. Just drove it all the way to the track too so I think I would have noticed if it was out of coolant.

Really stinks! I lucked out with that alum block 5.3 with 243 heads for $500. I managed to trash the head and the deck.

Pulled it yesterday. Going to try my spare 4.8 for the rest of this year at least.









Old 07-14-2014, 03:56 PM
  #207  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
SSSTANG#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 594
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Hate to hear that.
Old 07-14-2014, 04:24 PM
  #208  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,693
Received 1,139 Likes on 740 Posts

Default

Bummer, but thanks for chronicling your experience. How much of an increasing in timing was that?
Old 07-14-2014, 10:41 PM
  #209  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,952
Received 725 Likes on 532 Posts

Default

Same timing I've been running for awhile now 17*. I really dont' know if timing was the cause of this. I'd think there would be detonation signs if it was timing related. Looks like cylinder pressure was leaking. Possibly due to the china studs, or uneven head/deck surface.

These upclose pics show it looks like I've had CC leaks burrowing their way through the head and gasket for awhile now. I think one just finally made it all the way. I could be crazy, but I really don't feel I was detonating.
Attached Thumbnails 79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-cc.jpg   79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-img_5397.jpg   79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-head-good.jpg   79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-hg-good.jpg   79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-deck3.jpg  

Old 07-15-2014, 08:08 AM
  #210  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,693
Received 1,139 Likes on 740 Posts

Default

I sent a link to Kurt to see what he thinks.
Old 07-15-2014, 08:09 AM
  #211  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,952
Received 725 Likes on 532 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
I sent a link to Kurt to see what he thinks.
LOL.. I had sent him a PM last night. I feel bad, bet he gets a 100 questions a day from us rookies...
Old 07-15-2014, 08:15 AM
  #212  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,693
Received 1,139 Likes on 740 Posts

Default

I'm a lightweight on turbo stuff, but it doesn't seem like detonation took it out.

I forget, is this E85 + meth that you run, or 93 + meth?
Old 07-15-2014, 08:51 AM
  #213  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,952
Received 725 Likes on 532 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
I'm a lightweight on turbo stuff, but it doesn't seem like detonation took it out.

I forget, is this E85 + meth that you run, or 93 + meth?
E85 + 16GPH 50/50 water meth + A2A IC.

IAT was 160ish and IAT sensor is well upstream of the meth inj so it isn’t skewing the readings.
Old 07-15-2014, 08:56 AM
  #214  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,693
Received 1,139 Likes on 740 Posts

Default

Kurt did say via FB he had checked out the pics. Maybe you could take a close up of some of the damaged areas?

So would you be changing to different head studs or a different HG?

FWIW I've seen folks run 7's on E85 only, do you even need meth? [speaking 3rd-hand not an expert whatsoever]
Old 07-15-2014, 09:05 AM
  #215  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,952
Received 725 Likes on 532 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Kurt did say via FB he had checked out the pics. Maybe you could take a close up of some of the damaged areas?

So would you be changing to different head studs or a different HG?

FWIW I've seen folks run 7's on E85 only, do you even need meth? [speaking 3rd-hand not an expert whatsoever]
Need is a strong word. I’m not spraying a lot of volume like the pump gas/meth inj guys do. I just consider it extra cheap insurance. (apparently not enough! ) Had most of the parts laying around the shop from other cars, cost next to nothing to run it. Also from past experience the water helps keep everything nice and clean in the motor.
Old 07-15-2014, 12:39 PM
  #216  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,693
Received 1,139 Likes on 740 Posts

Default

Kurt said this back to me via FB:

That happens with mls when they lose the seal. The "fire" leaves like a blow torch....
Old 07-15-2014, 01:12 PM
  #217  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
SSSTANG#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 594
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

That happens with mls when they lose the seal. The "fire" leaves like a blow torch....
Ouch!!!
Old 07-15-2014, 05:42 PM
  #218  
On The Tree
 
68II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sucks this happened. You were really making strides with the 5.3, no doubt you would have dialed that in to run some mid-low 8's. The MPH was really showing the potential of the setup. Good luck with the 4.8 swap and look forward to updates.
Old 07-15-2014, 07:51 PM
  #219  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,952
Received 725 Likes on 532 Posts

Default

Popped off the other head and it looked perfect. The lower 2 middle stud nuts did feel like they needed less tension than the others to break free. With as good as everything looks I'm really leaning toward the studs loosening up after many heat cycles and/or failing. The funky tigerstripe machine work can't be helping either... As with most things operator error is usually the biggest issue. Then we blame the parts and machining!

China studs would probably have been just fine if I retorqued them as I should have. Hard to get to those suckers though without removing the manifold on the passenger side. Who wants to do all that! extra work!
Attached Thumbnails 79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-img_5455.jpg   79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)-img_5454.jpg  
Old 07-15-2014, 10:12 PM
  #220  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (21)
 
Verz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Man that sucks, def had it running good up top form the looks of it. Guess its a good thing you decided to keep that 4.8 after all huh.


Quick Reply: 79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 PM.