79 RX7 LS 5.3 Turbo. (8.93 @ 153mph)
#382
With a little work you can build a jack pad and get all 4 corners with one scale. I was going to use a harbor frieght car dolly to build a jack pad that will go under the tire.
Aknovaman on this forum built it. He is using his "china sources" So I don't have the Pn's listed.
Would be easiest to just make 4 rigs like this. Would be $240 worth of parts if you did it yourself. You'll have to contact Aknovaman to see what he would charge to do it.
Aknovaman on this forum built it. He is using his "china sources" So I don't have the Pn's listed.
Would be easiest to just make 4 rigs like this. Would be $240 worth of parts if you did it yourself. You'll have to contact Aknovaman to see what he would charge to do it.
Last edited by Forcefed86; 12-21-2015 at 10:14 AM.
#384
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Cell is 2.5 inches dia; button is approx. 0.5 inches. The load must be on the button.
I ordered another load cell in the S-type configuration. It essentially has a bolt hole on the top and bottom of the "S" which makes it easier to mount to the top of a floor jack and a platform or any size button on top of it. The scale auto zero's at power up to account for the weight of a platform. I do not believe you need more than one of these scales as you can mount it on a floor jack and just weigh each corner of the suspension. If you build a platform for it, you can weigh the corners under each tire too. I could adjust the code to make it read within one pound but I wanted to get it to Forced quickly.
I ordered another load cell in the S-type configuration. It essentially has a bolt hole on the top and bottom of the "S" which makes it easier to mount to the top of a floor jack and a platform or any size button on top of it. The scale auto zero's at power up to account for the weight of a platform. I do not believe you need more than one of these scales as you can mount it on a floor jack and just weigh each corner of the suspension. If you build a platform for it, you can weigh the corners under each tire too. I could adjust the code to make it read within one pound but I wanted to get it to Forced quickly.
Last edited by aknovaman; 12-21-2015 at 10:29 AM.
#385
TECH Resident
So to build simple individual weighing pads: I could bore a 2 1/2" recess in in a 8"x8" x 1 1/2" piece of wood and then bore shallow a 1/2" recess in a hockey puck and set wheels down on those? (or perhaps use a thick piece of aluminum instead of a hockey puck)?
I realize the four pads would need to be level.
Doug
I realize the four pads would need to be level.
Doug
#386
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Leveling is overkill and overrated. I suggested a platform of 1/2 inch steel with a small stack of washers welded to the middle of it to center the button. As long as the stack is not too tall and the load is placed directly on the button. The S-type cell would be easier. I don't suggest wood as it compresses and could lead to not all of the load on the button.
#387
TECH Resident
Hi Anthony,
I guess nominally off level doesn't change much if you calculate out the vector geometry.
Buying some square steel coupons (6"x6" maybe) with washers welded to center the pad about the cell is a simple and cheap. I had the same idea with the hockey puck and a partial bore down the middle (shallower than the button is tall). compressible shouldn't matter as long as the full load is supported by the button.
I'm going to PM you directly.
Thanks a bunch!
Doug
I guess nominally off level doesn't change much if you calculate out the vector geometry.
Buying some square steel coupons (6"x6" maybe) with washers welded to center the pad about the cell is a simple and cheap. I had the same idea with the hockey puck and a partial bore down the middle (shallower than the button is tall). compressible shouldn't matter as long as the full load is supported by the button.
I'm going to PM you directly.
Thanks a bunch!
Doug
#389
TECH Resident
Something like this:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1000kg-22CWT-S-TYPE-Beam-Load-Cell-Scale-Sensor-Weighting-Sensor-Qty-1/171905777298?_trksid=p2047675.c100005.m1851&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D34875%26meid%3Df0a036b1a8a941e492af16d4e68d464d%26pid%3D100005%26rk%3D4%26rkt%3D6%26sd%3D281265642259
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1000kg-22CWT-S-TYPE-Beam-Load-Cell-Scale-Sensor-Weighting-Sensor-Qty-1/171905777298?_trksid=p2047675.c100005.m1851&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D34875%26meid%3Df0a036b1a8a941e492af16d4e68d464d%26pid%3D100005%26rk%3D4%26rkt%3D6%26sd%3D281265642259
#391
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
Cool cheap scale!
But lifting one end that high is probably transferring weight and giving false readings. Maybe when you are weigh the front; put jackstands in the rear so the car is close to “ride t height”. Be worth a shot, see if you get different numbers from the current method.
But lifting one end that high is probably transferring weight and giving false readings. Maybe when you are weigh the front; put jackstands in the rear so the car is close to “ride t height”. Be worth a shot, see if you get different numbers from the current method.
#393
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
I bet you a soda it will be insignificant to any adjustments he is wanting to make unless the angular deviation is huge. In that case it would not be safe to jack up a car at such an extreme angle. Looking for my calculator now to computer the deviation based up a huge angular deviation.
Last edited by aknovaman; 12-22-2015 at 10:39 AM.
#394
I bet you a soda it will be insignificant to any adjustments he is wanting to make unless the angular deviation is huge. In that case it would not be safe to jack up a car at such an extreme angle. Looking for my calculator now to computer the deviation based up a huge angular deviation.
#397
According to the new scale 1307 with a full tank and 100lbs of ballast. 1500 up front. Haven't weighed it with me in the car.
#398
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
My buddy runs 4.20 in the 1/8 mile. His car lifts at about the 200 foot mark. Works like a champ and is cool to watch on the datalog. Much different than tracking front and rear wheel speeds for traction control.
Ultrasonic sensors are $1 each, arduino is $5, assorted parts to condition input signal for microsquirt is about an additional $10. Finally, add $1 for the plastic soap dish.
Ultrasonic sensors are $1 each, arduino is $5, assorted parts to condition input signal for microsquirt is about an additional $10. Finally, add $1 for the plastic soap dish.
#399
My buddy runs 4.20 in the 1/8 mile. His car lifts at about the 200 foot mark. Works like a champ and is cool to watch on the datalog. Much different than tracking front and rear wheel speeds for traction control.
Ultrasonic sensors are $1 each, arduino is $5, assorted parts to condition input signal for microsquirt is about an additional $10. Finally, add $1 for the plastic soap dish.
Ultrasonic sensors are $1 each, arduino is $5, assorted parts to condition input signal for microsquirt is about an additional $10. Finally, add $1 for the plastic soap dish.
#400
Well I just burned three hours reading every post and watching every video in this thread.
Great build and great documentation.
Thanks for recording all of this for the rest of us.
Great build and great documentation.
Thanks for recording all of this for the rest of us.