Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MPG Machine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2014, 01:09 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
mOtOrHeAd MiKe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa Ontario, Canada - where arguing "DA" is for the slow and weak...
Posts: 1,129
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Our LeMans wagon is going to be backed by a 4L60E, 3.08 gears and 28" tall tires... should do well on the highway. Project cost is estimated at $10-12K.
Old 01-21-2014, 03:12 PM
  #22  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,966
Received 731 Likes on 536 Posts

Default

Miatas are about as dorky as it gets IMHO...

Rx7 swaps are the way to go! Look at norotors.com for ideas. The engine bays are huge in the 86-91 models.

When I had the 2.73's in my 86 RX7 with the 200-4R OD trans and L/U converter I would see over 30mpg highway at 70+ and click off mid 10 second 1/4 mile passes.

Had a mildly built 3.8 (buick grand national motor).

Very comfortable to drive. Sold it for $6500. Was roughly 2750lbs with out driver.


Last edited by Forcefed86; 01-21-2014 at 03:18 PM.
Old 01-21-2014, 03:19 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
aknovaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hog Back, KS
Posts: 1,997
Received 104 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

Just buy a used VW diesel off craigslist for about $3k and be done with it. 45-50mpg. Do a muffler delete and a cold air intake. Burnouts are easy and the straight pipe turbo sounds cool too. Upsolute performance can burn a chip for the factory ECU for better performance.
Old 01-21-2014, 03:28 PM
  #24  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
garys 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Camdenton, MO
Posts: 3,709
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

That is the most logical and practical answer on here.
You should be kicked off this board immediately.

Originally Posted by aknovaman
Just buy a used VW diesel off craigslist for about $3k and be done with it. 45-50mpg. Do a muffler delete and a cold air intake. Burnouts are easy and the straight pipe turbo sounds cool too. Upsolute performance can burn a chip for the factory ECU for better performance.
Old 01-21-2014, 03:30 PM
  #25  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Miata, 240sx or rx7 would be my choice.

Put in an aluminum 4.8, t56 and 2.73 gears.

Wouldn't be surprised if you could pull mid-high 30s with that thing and still scoot pretty well due to the power/weight ratio.
Old 01-21-2014, 04:01 PM
  #26  
Teching In
 
BadWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what are some ways to actually get better mileage with the yukon?

would it be possible to add a tune that would get better mileage? less fuel at cruise and idle?
Old 01-21-2014, 04:32 PM
  #27  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

what are some ways to actually get better mileage with the yukon?
Weight reduction and lower numerically gears.

would it be possible to add a tune that would get better mileage? less fuel at cruise and idle?
Technically you should be able to do a custom open loop tune, but would require a very good tuner and you should really have at least 1 (if not 2) widebands in the car to monitor AFR.
Old 01-22-2014, 12:57 AM
  #28  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
gofastwclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: KCMO
Posts: 2,950
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BadWolf
what are some ways to actually get better mileage with the yukon?

would it be possible to add a tune that would get better mileage? less fuel at cruise and idle?
Originally Posted by redtan
Weight reduction and lower numerically gears.



Technically you should be able to do a custom open loop tune, but would require a very good tuner and you should really have at least 1 (if not 2) widebands in the car to monitor AFR.
One of the first problems with a Yukon (or any truck / SUV / van type vehicle) is you are trying to drive a brick wall down the highway. Aerodynamics on those vehicles suck plain and simple. Weight is the next factor, but not nearly as much while moving at steady state (i.e. highway) as aero unless you are accelerating or decelerating.

There are some things within the engine, exhaust, drive train and PCM calibration that can help a good bit but in the end it's still a brick wall from an aerodynamic perspective.
Old 01-22-2014, 05:46 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
aknovaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hog Back, KS
Posts: 1,997
Received 104 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

Perhaps go fast should throw up his mpg and vehicle weight as a sample of what can be done with a custom tune. Plz don't mention who did the tune or how it was done as the tuner is not a sponsor.
Old 01-22-2014, 09:40 AM
  #30  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
ls1nova71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Liberty, MO
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 0
Received 197 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

Although it's probably a tad outside the 12k budget, an early 2000's 6 speed Corvette, as G Body said, would be my choice! They get around 30 mpg on the highway. If you're dead set on doing a swap though, you could put a 4.8 in it! Probably have the only one of those around.

OR, you could just get one of those hydrogen generator things that I have to hear about from my neighbor every time he comes over. His Jeep Liberty gets like 100 mpg or something. LOL!
Old 01-22-2014, 09:44 AM
  #31  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,966
Received 731 Likes on 536 Posts

Default

I just bought a 99 vette 6spd last year. (for 12k actually!)

While it does get 30mpg or so crusiing 70 in 6th, I still average 15mpg or so by the time you figure city driving in. If I baby it a week I can average 18mpg. Still not great IMO. Something lighter weight with a taller gear is the way to go.
Old 01-22-2014, 10:18 AM
  #32  
Teching In
 
BadWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my suburban (04 2wd 5.3L) is averaging about 12-13 mpg city/highway lol i really thought it would get a little better then that but its been super cold so i think thats made a bad difference

also i think my clutch fan is on all the time. im really considering a swap to electric fans
Old 01-22-2014, 11:29 AM
  #33  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,966
Received 731 Likes on 536 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BadWolf
my suburban (04 2wd 5.3L) is averaging about 12-13 mpg city/highway lol i really thought it would get a little better then that but its been super cold so i think thats made a bad difference

also i think my clutch fan is on all the time. im really considering a swap to electric fans
That may give you a whole .02 mpg savings.

IMO cheapest and easiest way on your current rig would be to buy cheap tires as narrow and tall as you can fit. Then run alot of tire pressure.
Old 01-22-2014, 01:35 PM
  #34  
11 Second Club
 
MX6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Burnie, MD
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by garys 68
One other consideration here is emmisions testing. Pre OBDII cars just need a visual inspection. Post OBDII cars would show up on their computer with a lot of emmisions things missing.
I think a lot of that depends on which state you live in. If my car were pre-96 it would have never passed the sniffer test with no cats or emissions equipment. Here they only plug in the obd2 plug and look under the car...too easy.

It's going to be tough to find a car that's lighter and is as easy to swap as the Miata. I'm running a 3.23 rear so it'll cruise at 80mph at 2K rpm. I've never kept my foot out of it long enough to get an accurate mpg, but I'd imagine it would be pretty good.
Old 01-22-2014, 01:36 PM
  #35  
Teching In
 
BadWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well my thoughts are if the fan is dragging the motor down that could cause a loss of mpg

i had a 5.0 mustang years ago that had a clutch fan that went out. it was doing the same thing my burb seems to be doing, sounds like an airplane driving down the road. i picked up 3 mph at the track taking it off, thats basically 30hp

im sure your probably right though, probably wont make that much difference but i figured every little bit would help
Old 01-22-2014, 01:53 PM
  #36  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
operatorfailure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have thought of building a mpg ls car. I would do it to prove you can do it, not to save money. If it was done to save gas you're so far in the hole to start you will never make it up. I think you could build a turbo 4.8 in a 240 and get 25 mpg on the hwy and run low 11's fairly easily.
Old 01-22-2014, 02:08 PM
  #37  
Teching In
 
Jason454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: hampton,mn
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Unless your looking for a project it would be cheaper to drive the suv you have. 10-12k plus an extra car to insure and maintain every month.....equals a lot of gas.
Old 01-22-2014, 03:56 PM
  #38  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
gofastwclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: KCMO
Posts: 2,950
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by aknovaman
Perhaps go fast should throw up his mpg and vehicle weight as a sample of what can be done with a custom tune. Plz don't mention who did the tune or how it was done as the tuner is not a sponsor.
Latest MPG was high 23, low 24 -ish highway at roughly 70 - 75 MPH. Vehicle weight is around 3700 with a full tank (without me or the lady). I would probably do better if I didn't drive so fast...

1997 Thunderbird lowered 1.5 to 2" with 16" factory size wheels:
Gen III 5.3, electric fan, 4L60E with a junkyard transmission cooler, 3:23 gear with "411 style" custom tuned PCM using a 99 Corvette intake, LS6 valve springs and a Muscle Car oil pan kit. True 2.5" dual exhaust into 2.25" factory Thunderbird mufflers using some butchered and hacked (i.e. poor flowing) C5 corvette manifolds up front. Modified aftermarket custom air intake for a 99 Silverado.

I feel there is room for improvement if I build some good flowing short or mid length headers (nothing factory fits) and adjust the air intake to work as a "cold air" / ram air setup at speed. Right now the intake picks up some bleed through air from inside the engine compartment if stationary, however while moving the air temps stay within 3 - 5 degrees of ambient.

Originally Posted by Jason454
Unless your looking for a project it would be cheaper to drive the suv you have. 10-12k plus an extra car to insure and maintain every month.....equals a lot of gas.
I realize not everyone has fabrication skills, but people astonish me with these 10 to 12K builds for essentially stock cars. My original budget was $2000 excluding the price of the vehicle which I already had and got cheap. Everything in my swap except consumables, the Silverado cold air kit, LS6 springs and driveshaft are straight from the junkyard.

Full details on the car and budget are in my signature.
Old 01-22-2014, 04:51 PM
  #39  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
fieroguru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 827
Received 208 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AnotherWs6
Uuuuuummmm, wait, WTF? Where can I see this thing? Do you have a build thread?
Here's the build thread:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...peed-swap.html
Old 01-22-2014, 04:59 PM
  #40  
TECH Apprentice
 
cobalt964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

out of budget range, but light, super simple, fast, fun, and good mpg. 1974-1986 Porsche 911 with 5.3. 28mpg. 2280lbs.


Quick Reply: MPG Machine



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.