holley 302-2 pan with stroker?
Trending Topics
Are you talking about clearance of the front section windage tray? If i remember correctly i had to cut and remove that section with this pan... Also had to modify the windage tray for the oil pickup tube.
To run a 4" stroker and this pan if I simply space out the windage tray, will the tray hit the pan itself?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Are you talking about clearance of the front section windage tray? If i remember correctly i had to cut and remove that section with this pan... Also had to modify the windage tray for the oil pickup tube.
To run a 4" stroker and this pan if I simply space out the windage tray, will the tray hit the pan itself?
Depending on the vehicle application, you could use the 302-2 pan with one of the LS oil pan spacers available on the market to clear a 4" stroke crank. I've seen them made in .250 and .375 versions. The undesirable result of this configuration in my opinion is that the oil pan tie-in holes to the bellhousing will no longer line-up, but maybe that would be acceptable to some.
As was mentioned, you could use an F-body pan to clear a 4" stroke but in many applications it requires notching the sump to clear the crossmember, which in turn reduces the oil capacity of the pan. What type of vehicle are you using this on?
Andrew
I understand it comes down to whatever the user/owner is comfortable doing. If I was swapping an LS into a car that had any collector value, I wouldn't cut anything on the car and instead would modify the LS-specific parts to fit the car as needed. If it was just an average car with no specific collector value then that may change my mind as to whether I would choose to notch the oil pan or the vehicle frame.
On the same token, some cars have far more room available in which to fit an LS and just about any pan you want to put on it, like a second gen F-body. Other cars, like G-bodies and A-bodies, are more clearance challenged.






