Is my radiator causing my overheating? Regarding the rows in the radiator
With 187 thermostat (or whatever stock is), I always seem to slowly creep up to 210 degrees, then all of a sudden it just starts climbing and climbing. I always turn the car off when I get to 230 degrees. I have two high power fans on the radiator, but even with that, it does this over heating trend when when cruising on the highway. I swapped in a 160 thermostat, it stays at around 190, but then slowly creeps up to 230degrees.
I've bought a radiator funnel, and have made the all of the bubbles are you of the system with the heater blasting.
It only does this in the dead of the summer (Houston, 100 degree +), it never overheats in the winter. I also notice that if I turn the heater on, the temperature starts to drop
I just read that a 4 row (or 3 row) aluminum radiator is actually very inefficient at cooling, due to the tubes being very small. Could this be my issue? My friend has the same car (Chevelle) with an LS2. He has a 2 row radiator, with 1" tubes, and with his 160 thermostat, the car rarely breaks 190 in the same heat.
I run a 16" x 24" aluminum with 2 1" rows of tubes/fins. So far mine stays either right at the normal head temp (196F with a 187F t'stat on the inlet side) or right at the fan control temp (203F) if I'm not going fast enough to move enough air to cool it without the fans. Even in 90+ temps with A/C on - the temp never moves beyond as described above.
A bit on multi-tube radiators --- some folks used to think that if they went from a 2 row to a 3 row -- that they'd pick up 50% more cooling capability; if they went to a 4 row - 100% more than the 2 row. Doesn't work that way -- as the air moves across the first row, it picks up heat. Since the air is hotter when it hits the 2nd row, it can't remove as much heat from the 2nd row because the delta-T is now smaller. Same thing for the 3rd row and the 4th row - each one becomes a good bit less effective at removing heat from the motor. The rule of thumb I've used is moving from a 2 row to a 3 row adds about 25% more heat rejection ability; adding a 4th row only adds about 10% more. So the same size (L x W) 4 row (same size tubes) will remove more heat than a 2 row -- but not as much more as one might think. This contrasts with staying with a 2 row, but altering the L x W of the core. If you want 50% more cooling capability - here's an example. A 20" x 20" unit has 400 sq. inches -- go to 600 sq. inches (20 x 30) with the same number of rows and you'll get your 50% increase in heat rejection capacity. If, in fact, your 4 tube has smaller tubes in it than the same size 2 tube, that has an impact too. But I'm having a hard time believing that a clean/unclogged 4 row aluminum in a L x W size that's appropriate for your car won't keep it cool. Usually it's either a problem with the radiator (internal deposits interfering with heat transfer) or a fan problem (not moving enough air).
Like someone said when moving you shouldn't need the fans.
Make sure the air goes through and not around the radiator. Nothing blocking the inlet and no big gaps on the sides or top of the radiator for air to flow around. Make sure the fan shrouds are not blocking natural airflow. Many have flaps on large flat parts.
Make sure the air can get out of the engine bay. Shouldn't be an issue with a Chevelle I would think.
On some cars an airdam or "chin pan" on the frame right behind the radiator can prevent turbulence and smooth out the airflow through the radiator.
Also rev the engine and make sure the lower radiator hose isn't collapsing. there should be a spring in there to prevent the water pump suction from closing off the hose
If so, I agree with 64SS - likely not a fan issue. Could be a fouled radiator -- engine output/thermal load greater at highway speed than in traffic. But it could also be that you need to create a bit of low pressure behind/below the radiator in order to entice air to flow across the rad at speed. Most newer cars (say, last 30-35 years) have some sort of air dam or "splash shield" that blocks off air flow below the radiator. The creates an area of low pressure behind and below the radiator. That makes it easy for air to move through the rad at speed and exit under the bottom of the car. The old fox body Mustangs had a little black plastic 'air dam' that lived a good 2' back of the nose of the car right under the radiator. Those would occasionally get knocked off on a curb or folks would remove them -- and then the cars often tended to run hot on the highway. Put the 'dam' back on -- voila, no more overheating on the highway.
It's another thought...
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I run a 16" x 24" aluminum with 2 1" rows of tubes/fins. So far mine stays either right at the normal head temp (196F with a 187F t'stat on the inlet side) or right at the fan control temp (203F) if I'm not going fast enough to move enough air to cool it without the fans. Even in 90+ temps with A/C on - the temp never moves beyond as described above.
A bit on multi-tube radiators --- some folks used to think that if they went from a 2 row to a 3 row -- that they'd pick up 50% more cooling capability; if they went to a 4 row - 100% more than the 2 row. Doesn't work that way -- as the air moves across the first row, it picks up heat. Since the air is hotter when it hits the 2nd row, it can't remove as much heat from the 2nd row because the delta-T is now smaller. Same thing for the 3rd row and the 4th row - each one becomes a good bit less effective at removing heat from the motor. The rule of thumb I've used is moving from a 2 row to a 3 row adds about 25% more heat rejection ability; adding a 4th row only adds about 10% more. So the same size (L x W) 4 row (same size tubes) will remove more heat than a 2 row -- but not as much more as one might think. This contrasts with staying with a 2 row, but altering the L x W of the core. If you want 50% more cooling capability - here's an example. A 20" x 20" unit has 400 sq. inches -- go to 600 sq. inches (20 x 30) with the same number of rows and you'll get your 50% increase in heat rejection capacity. If, in fact, your 4 tube has smaller tubes in it than the same size 2 tube, that has an impact too. But I'm having a hard time believing that a clean/unclogged 4 row aluminum in a L x W size that's appropriate for your car won't keep it cool. Usually it's either a problem with the radiator (internal deposits interfering with heat transfer) or a fan problem (not moving enough air).
I've been reading up on how aluminum radiators are not efficient above 2 rows, and that 3 rows + are just a gimmick to sell, because the math doesn't add up as far as cooling area when considering the surface area and also the resistance a 4/3 row creates with wind resistance (as this article stated)
Like someone said when moving you shouldn't need the fans.
Make sure the air goes through and not around the radiator. Nothing blocking the inlet and no big gaps on the sides or top of the radiator for air to flow around. Make sure the fan shrouds are not blocking natural airflow. Many have flaps on large flat parts.
Make sure the air can get out of the engine bay. Shouldn't be an issue with a Chevelle I would think.
On some cars an airdam or "chin pan" on the frame right behind the radiator can prevent turbulence and smooth out the airflow through the radiator.
Also rev the engine and make sure the lower radiator hose isn't collapsing. there should be a spring in there to prevent the water pump suction from closing off the hose
If so, I agree with 64SS - likely not a fan issue. Could be a fouled radiator -- engine output/thermal load greater at highway speed than in traffic. But it could also be that you need to create a bit of low pressure behind/below the radiator in order to entice air to flow across the rad at speed. Most newer cars (say, last 30-35 years) have some sort of air dam or "splash shield" that blocks off air flow below the radiator. The creates an area of low pressure behind and below the radiator. That makes it easy for air to move through the rad at speed and exit under the bottom of the car. The old fox body Mustangs had a little black plastic 'air dam' that lived a good 2' back of the nose of the car right under the radiator. Those would occasionally get knocked off on a curb or folks would remove them -- and then the cars often tended to run hot on the highway. Put the 'dam' back on -- voila, no more overheating on the highway.
It's another thought...
Here are the pics of the inside of the radiator, not super clean. Not sure if this is my problem or not. Fluid is super clean and green, I don't know what all that residue is from. Previous owner did say he threw a rod through the oil pan with that radiator on the car, seems like the radiator would be way dirtier if that got oil in the coolant (maybe I'm wrong). It is a 3 row radiator btw
Thanks for all the help
Edit: it seems like the residue is from the red style coolant the previous owner used, just caked on the side wall
Last edited by TXjeepTJ; Jul 31, 2018 at 05:59 PM.
Usually when the overheating is occurring everywhere/all the time -- it's usually the radiator that is the culprit. Either fouled, dirty or simply not enough capacity.
Usually when the overheating is occurring everywhere/all the time -- it's usually the radiator that is the culprit. Either fouled, dirty or simply not enough capacity.
On my friends car, when he would rev it with the radiator cap off, the coolant would rush violently through the radiator. On mine, it sort of trickles out, but with a little more force than a trickle
I did install new head gaskets btw, so now you got me scared lol I followed the directions extremely close installing them though
Edit: I ran LS3 cometic head gaskets, I just read that it doesn't matter which way those are installed (hopefully whoever said that is right?)
Edit #2: I just checked to make sure the head gasket tab is near the front of the engine, and not the back - I was only able to see the driver's side, and it was on the front. On the passenger's side, I couldn't see a tab on the back and my turbo is blocking me from seeing it on the front, but I'm sure it is on the front
Last edited by TXjeepTJ; Aug 1, 2018 at 08:22 AM.










