Anyone weight there ls1 3rd gen (GTA particularly)
#3
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 2
From: Anderson, Indiana
Not a GTA but my 91 Z28 weighed about 3130 back when the LS1 was normally aspirated. That's was with no driver, no A/C, no back seat, and a non T-top car. It's up about 100 pounds now with the supercharger. But that's a NICE 100 pounds!
__________________
91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
#6
In general the motor is about +-100 lbs less. I also have tubular k-member and a-arms which might be 30 lbs or so. If you went from a 700R4 to a T-56 you would probably save some more because I think the T56 is lighter.
Trending Topics
#10
I measured the ride height from different front end locations like from the bottom of the front frame to the floor before I remove the stock engine and transmission. After I get the car on the ground with the LS1 and transmission in it I will remeasure to see if it impacts the ride height.
When I re-measure I will post on my on going El Camino thread. I am not there yet. I am expecting slight ride height increase but I suspect it will be less than 1 inch. My installation placed the motor in almost the exact location as others have used motor mounts that move the motor up and more forward than a stock location. I would suspect my installation would show the most difference where the other installations with the motor more forward would show the least.
When I re-measure I will post on my on going El Camino thread. I am not there yet. I am expecting slight ride height increase but I suspect it will be less than 1 inch. My installation placed the motor in almost the exact location as others have used motor mounts that move the motor up and more forward than a stock location. I would suspect my installation would show the most difference where the other installations with the motor more forward would show the least.
#11
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 2
From: Anderson, Indiana
Originally Posted by 91sbcamaro
so does it or does it not raise the front end up 1-2"s
__________________
91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
#12
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 2
From: Anderson, Indiana
I don't have any real good views showing the ride height difference. This one gives you a little idea of the change (maybe):
__________________
91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
#13
Here's the height difference on our car w/ sportlines. It was too low in the back w/ the springs in after so I went back to stock rear's.
Before the springs-
With all 4 Sportlines in-
Stock rears and Sportlines in the front (the angle sucks cause the hill, but yea)
Before the springs-
With all 4 Sportlines in-
Stock rears and Sportlines in the front (the angle sucks cause the hill, but yea)
#14
Originally Posted by Speartech
Not a GTA but my 91 Z28 weighed about 3130 back when the LS1 was normally aspirated. That's was with no driver, no A/C, no back seat, and a non T-top car. It's up about 100 pounds now with the supercharger. But that's a NICE 100 pounds!
My '87 is a hard top car also. Very nice info to know. Do you have a tubular K-member also? Roll cage?
yes that 100lb Radix is damn nice! Car looks good!! I will be in touch with you sir in the future about wire harnesses.
Thanks!
#15
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 2
From: Anderson, Indiana
No tubular K-member or roll cage.
It always seems to sit higher in the front when I push the pedal on right.
Sorry....I couldn't resist!
It always seems to sit higher in the front when I push the pedal on right.
Sorry....I couldn't resist!
__________________
91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno
www.speartech.com
#17
full weight, my car was 3615lbs with me in it.
it now weighs 3220 with me in it... i weigh 10lbs more then i did when it was weighed stock.
i still have skinnies, lightweight battery, lightweight carpet, and a few other mods to do to lose weight.
it now weighs 3220 with me in it... i weigh 10lbs more then i did when it was weighed stock.
i still have skinnies, lightweight battery, lightweight carpet, and a few other mods to do to lose weight.
#18
Originally Posted by 91sbcamaro
With the 1" lowering springs and after the swap do you run into any major difficulties. other then speed bumps ect..?
#20
Just in case anyone searches for weights on GTAs, mine was originally 3750 with me in it (225 lbs). (Yeah, it was a bit of a tank...) I did some weight reduction before starting on my L92 swap, & was able to take 110 lbs. out of the car. Once my swap is complete, I'll update this thread as soon as I'm able to weigh the car again.