Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1970 GTO Version 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2008 | 10:22 PM
  #121  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

Originally Posted by NoRotor88
Do you have a link for the hose clamps?

Thanks!
Jesse
www.mcmaster.com

search under "heat shrink hose clamps"

Andrew
Old 05-11-2008 | 10:58 PM
  #122  
NoRotor88's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Davenport, IA
Default

Originally Posted by Project GatTagO
www.mcmaster.com

search under "heat shrink hose clamps"

Andrew
The clamps are pretty slick!

Thank you.

Jesse
Old 05-12-2008 | 07:31 PM
  #123  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

You're welcome Jesse.

Big day today. After a rather dismal, windy day yesterday, the weather today was just amazing. I needed a little inspiration so I decided that it was time for the GTO to move under its own power. I so installed a seat, put on some wheels, cleared out the tools, and pulled it out of the garage.





Of course I couldn't resist. So I went around the block. The clutch is silky smooth. Converting from the old Z-bar to the hydraulic release was definitely worth it. The clutch actuation is just like on a modern car. Super smooth. I still don't have exhaust so the drive was short. The brakes felt solid so the MC is working well. I also noticed some noises which I think are the result of my messing around with driveline angles. I raised the back of my transmission to get the angles perfect, but now the u-joint is grazing the floor. More on driveline angles later.

Notice how much higher the front sits. I bet it's up a minimum of 2". I can't wait to get the thing scaled. I am also contemplating getting a fiberglass hood and ditching the shaker. The stock hood is probably 40-50 lbs, plus another 10 lbs for the shaker. A Glasstek fiberglass hood is probably about 25 lbs. I am open to opinions.

Andrew
Old 05-13-2008 | 09:03 AM
  #124  
93Polo's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 12
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Good to hear the car is moving under its own power again
Old 05-13-2008 | 11:54 AM
  #125  
tirefryin_s10's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: edmonton alberta canada
Default

I vote a glass hood with a factory hood mounted tach.
Old 05-14-2008 | 07:42 PM
  #126  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

This is an update for the techno geeks. If you like looking at pretty pictures, stop reading now, and move on. If being diligent about every little technical detail of your car is something that you enjoy doing, than please read on.

Ever since I have owned my car, all 23 years, I have had some sort of vibration in the driveline at speeds about 70 MPH. Most of the equipment on my car has changed numerous times. The only constant being the ride height. In recent weeks I have really been studying what actually happens with these cars when they are lowered. I give a lot of credit to Troy, I forget his user name here. LOL He and I have exchanged some messages back and forth and he has really helped me to understand what it will take to make my car smooth. This is a thread that he started on Chevelles.com:

http://www.chevelles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=213271

There is also another great website that I used:

http://www.vibratesoftware.com/html_...aft_Angles.htm

This is by far the best website for explaining and measuring driveline angles.

The problem with GM A-bodies is that as the cars are lowered in the rear and front working angle increases dramatically. While it is possible to match the the rear working angle to the front working angle with adjustable upper control arms in the rear, this still does not address the problem of just having too much working angle.

I have no doubt that I will get 10 different opinion on this post. There seems to be a lot of conflicting information when it comes to driveline angles. I feel that the information in the above website is the most accurate that I have seen to date.

For the sake of this discussion I will always refer to something pointing UP when it is pointing from the back to the front of the car. Like this:

[front] \ [rear] = UP

[front] / [rear] = DOWN

I made a spacer which raised the back of the transmission about 1/2". My final readings were as follows:

Transmission: 2.5* UP
Driveshaft: .3* UP
Pinion: 2* DOWN

Front working angle: 2.5 - 0.3 = 2.2*
Rear working angle: 2 + 0.3 = 2.3*

I ran the car on jackstands and took it up to about 4000 RPM in 6th gear, which is over 5000RPM driveshaft speed. It seemed very smooth. Much more so than at other setting. The ultimate test will be how the car feels at speed.

Andrew
Old 05-15-2008 | 09:10 AM
  #127  
Steve68's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 6
From: Orl Fl
Default

Nice write up Andrew, I'm jelous of you and the car, I wish mine was a1/4 close to yours,
Old 05-15-2008 | 11:18 AM
  #128  
1BadAction's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX!
Default

hmmm... great information on the DS angles. I'll be using that in the near future.
Old 05-16-2008 | 06:18 PM
  #129  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

Today I got the notice of approval from Grundy Insurance. On Monday I will go get the car registered and it will be legal to drive on the street. I also ordered a new 3" to 3" Dr. Gas x-pipe. This will just make the exhaust work a little simpler and cleaner. That should be here on Monday.

My car is not orange..LOL



Andrew
Old 05-16-2008 | 06:35 PM
  #130  
john 67's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 630
Likes: 1
From: New York City
Default

Andrew ,thanks for all the great info on your thread,i'ii be using it as a reference for the rest of my build ,JOHN
Old 05-17-2008 | 05:56 PM
  #131  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

I was going through some old paperwork this afternoon and I found my old corner scale sheet. Here are the numbers with driver:

[Front Left]-------------------------[Front Right]
1218----------------------------------1153



[Rear Left]---------------------------[Rear Right]
929------------------------------------884

Total Weight = 4184

56.7% front
43.4% rear

Andrew
Old 05-19-2008 | 05:31 AM
  #132  
hulley's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Hoschton, Ga. 1 mile from YearOne inc.
Default

I cant tell you how much help your thread has been to me! I have a 68 chevelle and your attention to detail has been a huge help. Thank you very much! Great build! Great lookin Goat!
Old 05-19-2008 | 11:19 AM
  #133  
EdelExh's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Default

Andrew, Those are the corner weights with the 502? Cause that is pretty good for a heavy BB, you should really be great with the LS.
Old 05-19-2008 | 12:45 PM
  #134  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

Originally Posted by EdelExh
Andrew, Those are the corner weights with the 502? Cause that is pretty good for a heavy BB, you should really be great with the LS.
Yes, those corner weights are with the 502. Honestly I am expecting the weight distribution to be almost 50/50.

My new x-pipe should be here today. I can't wait to get the exhaust buttoned up. I am really not into the open header thing...

Andrew
Old 05-20-2008 | 08:20 PM
  #135  
Jim Maras's Avatar
Teching In

 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

Andrew, thanks for the great info! I've learned alot about clutch and drive train that will really help me with my 69 project. keep the info coming! Jim
Old 05-20-2008 | 09:19 PM
  #136  
digitalsolo's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 3
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Default

Andrew,

Just a quick bit on the tach stuff. Not sure if this will be any help to you at all at this point, but the VDO gauges work just fine with Gen III and Gen IV PCM tach outputs, even with my FJO progressive controller pulling on the circuit as well.

I had two different autometer tachs, one from ~1985 and one from 2007, and the 1985 tach worked great for me... the 2007 tach was exceedingly jumpy. Apparently they broke something in their design between "then" and "now".

Car is looking great, I'm looking forward to seeing it all put together.
Old 05-22-2008 | 05:06 PM
  #137  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

I think the Gen IV outputs must be a little different than the older Gen III.


Today I got the exhaust buttoned up. A new Dr.Gas x-pipe was installed and connected the headers to the mufflers. The car is very quiet. Almost too quiet. I has a nice deep tone. It is a hair louder than a new ZO6 Corvette. I got the wideband hooked up as well and as suspected the car was a little rich. Once I drove it a little the ECU started trimming the A/F ratio and now it is very close. I may not have to get it tuned at all. We'll see how the WOT A/F ratio is on the dyno.

I also weighed the car on the new scales at Beech Bend. I had 1/3 of a tank of gas, no hood, no passenger seat, and I was in the car. I think I am about 275.

Anyone care to guess what the car weighed?

Andrew
Old 05-22-2008 | 07:08 PM
  #138  
kevin99hoss's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 482
Likes: 4
From: NW Indiana
Default

i am gonna guess 3825 lbs.
Old 05-23-2008 | 01:18 AM
  #139  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,222
Likes: 1,511
From: The City of Fountains
Default

With me in it, no hood, no passenger seat, 1/3 tank of gas, it was 3828.

3823
minus 275 for my fat ***
add 50 for hood
add 25 for seat

3623

So it looks like the car lost a little under 300 pounds from the swap. Not bad. It will be really interesting to get the corner scale data.

Andrew
Old 05-23-2008 | 07:45 AM
  #140  
Steve68's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 6
From: Orl Fl
Default

I won this the last time, got my rendering in the garage!!!


Quick Reply: 1970 GTO Version 2.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.