allngn_c5

iTrader: (3)

SCR assuming deck height is 0, 58cc chambers, .056 gasket, and -12 cc pistons shows 11.1 to 1 according to the SCR calculator I found online. I am not 100% sure of the gasket thickness, or the deck height. Either way that's a good ballpark number. Wasn't able to do the DCR for ya .... I need rod length and degrees after or btdc or something. At any rate she's a beast.

98camaroLS1M6

iTrader: (35)

Yeah, that's definitely impressive!

Next Phase

Congrats on the new motor! I had a 408 in my C5 vert and that car was a lot of fun. Be careful out there!

98camaroLS1M6

iTrader: (35)

I saw a post in your original dyno thread and Louis said SCR was approx high 11s and DCR is well into the 9s with a max of 26* timing and still safe on pump gas That's cool.

QUIKSILVERZ

congrats doug!

allngn_c5

iTrader: (3)

The pistons must come up out of the hole a bit or a thinner gasket was used. Punching in the numbers I know for sure gave me 11.1 scr. I'll have to ask him for the specifics.

allngn_c5

iTrader: (3)

Looking closely at the graph, especially in the 3500 and 4500 rpm areas and even up to around 5000 or so there are huge differences. +20 rwhp and +20 rwtq !! I suppose it may be a little more, or a little less in the areas in between but +20 rw hp/tq is a significant jump to me when its right in the heart of daily driving. Nice to know I got all the power under the curve that I can use, and don't have to rev the **** out of it to feel the power. Ok I am done babbling. I'll post more if anything else is done to the car.

98camaroLS1M6

iTrader: (35)

That'd be cool if you found out, if not no biggie.

pittman

iTrader: (1)

Damn Doug, what an animal you have now. I can't wait to see your mph in the 1/4 mile. ET might suck because of wheel spin....lol. Get that puppy on the track for a couple runs ASAP !!

Pitt

allngn_c5

iTrader: (3)

Well I won't be able to do anything until this spring. But I am hoping for a 127+ mph trap speed. Trying to be conservative because I don't have an optimum track gear (3.90 or 4.10) I have 3.42's. I am sure I'll be in 4th gear for more time then before, allowing more topend.

pittman

iTrader: (1)

well I was at 124 mph with the 346 and only 434 rwhp..same gear as you. You will be higher I think

allngn_c5

iTrader: (3)

Damn, that just makes me feel like I can't drive. It's ok, I know I get nervous and drive like ****. If only I could duplicate my ability when just f'ng around at the time when its serious. Come for a visit this spring Pitt and drive the car for me on a pass or two.

pittman

iTrader: (1)

That may happen one day. The wifes sister is close to Detroit (just north in Armada). Her brother in law retired from the Detroit Police Dept. Vinnie Finn is his name...about 6'5" tall and 325 lb...fricken giant. Did you know him ?

I won't be back on till tomorrow night. Damn job...lol

Pitt

allngn_c5

iTrader: (3)

Nope, but I'll ask my friend that works for DPD now if he knows him. Let you know later. Small world man.

WADDISME

iTrader: (4)

Awesome numbers and well worth the wait. Now just get it and . That power line is almost as linear as a sc'd one.

98camaroLS1M6

iTrader: (35)

You should trap 130+mph, you just need seat time. My buddy went 11.20@123mph in his 420rwhp cam-only Z06 with stock gears, 1.59 60' but he can shift his *** off. DA/ track prep/ driver mod all play a big factor. 127mph should be fairly easy even in 85+* weather with almost 520rwhp/515rwtq lol.

02ZOh6

Nice #'s Doug. You ever see Kwame at work?

WKMCD

iTrader: (2)

Nice numbers Doug. Congrats!!!

Now I can't wait to get the FAST 102 for the L92 heads.

Kevin

SlowFRC

iTrader: (2)

I said "its about time" half jokingly, I felt it was appropiate because your set up has been hyped a good bit (there are 7 threads that were posted by you about this set up) over the last couple of months. When something is given that much attention people are going to be anxious to see results. I understand that picking up the car isn't a possibility for you during this time of year, I didn't make my statement to say that you or LG are doing something wrong. But I do have to ask, was it really nessasary to have 7 threads dedicated to this topic? It seems like a bit of overkill to me.

Having said this I'll repeat, nice numbers. My power goals for my car in the future include 400+ CID of n/a power so set ups like these are right up my alley.

allngn_c5

iTrader: (3)

I don't doubt your intent brother, its just how it was perceived by some. So I did what I felt was in the best interests of LG Motorsports. When you make a statement that could be taken the wrong way it usually is, and the involved parties thought it would be wise to clarify why it took so long to get everything done vs read into your comments and assume that LG Motorsports can't get things done in a timely fashion. LG Motorsports has always went above and beyond for me and many other customers, and for the few people that come out and say something negative about LG Motorsports you have to remember theres another side to the story.

Nothing against you per say, just wanted to clarify and/or justify the time it took to complete this project. Stay tuned though, there could be other things happening.

Just for the sake of accuracy you said its about damn time, we've been waiting forever.

On the 7 threads, there were threads posted in the dyno and corvette sections, same thread just posted in both places because some people don't go to the dyno section and vice versa. I don't recall 7 threads either. Another reason for the additional threads was due to the time it did take to get the project done. After the thread was months old and sorta stale, I preferred to start a new thread rather then have the RESULTS lost in the mix of a 100 + post thread.