13.7 is fastest 4th gen F body
06-03-2010, 05:07 PM
#46
i dont know if this technically counts as stock but, they claim stock down to the filter, with mickey thompson DR's. you make the call im just playing devils advocate 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkXFFrpVgRQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkXFFrpVgRQ
06-03-2010, 08:36 PM
#47
Back in 2006 I got a 13.15@107 out of my 2000 Z28 M6 just as it came off the showroom floor. Stock 245/50/16 Good Year street tires and even a paper air filter!
I just looked the DA up on Dragtimes.com of that date and time and it came out to 160ft which is super low for that particular track... my times in my sig for both car's are in 2000-2500 DA area!
Here's the slip:
While I was looking at these older pics on my photobucket I found my same stock dyno sheet for the car... It only made 297 or so stock, I pulled the air filter out and left the stock lid open and it put down 303hp!
I just looked the DA up on Dragtimes.com of that date and time and it came out to 160ft which is super low for that particular track... my times in my sig for both car's are in 2000-2500 DA area!
Here's the slip:
While I was looking at these older pics on my photobucket I found my same stock dyno sheet for the car... It only made 297 or so stock, I pulled the air filter out and left the stock lid open and it put down 303hp!
Last edited by LSxPwrDZ; 06-03-2010 at 08:43 PM.
07-02-2010, 06:51 PM
#51
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my 2000 A4 ss went 13.14 @109 on street tires bone stock but it had the slp dual/dual that came on it. my uncle has a 02 M6 ss that came with dual/dual it ran 12.89 on street tires dont rember wat mph was
07-15-2010, 10:24 PM
#53
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: beaverton
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah road and track tested a 99 ss m6 back in the day and they only musterd a 13.9 just .1 faster than the comperable cobra..butah yeah i ran a 13.7 at 107 with a 2.2 60 foot time...that was b4 my mods. these cars are freaks...with so much potential i feel gm put a 10 bolt in them to try and hold people back and give the car a achilles heel! if they would have thrown a 12 bolt in them from the factory...man..it would be the ultimate bargan muscle car! it still is in my opinon.
07-16-2010, 09:01 AM
#55
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV NV
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No clue.....? It seems the guy is more right then wrong......In this thread their are multiple people saying there are tons of stock ones that have run 12's.....In this very thread though, its not tons......its 1, uno, one.......and his screen name is "unbelievablels1" LOL, how fitting.
It can happen.....sure......but it takes more then good star alignment.
It can happen.....sure......but it takes more then good star alignment.
07-17-2010, 01:15 AM
#57
I know this thread is almost a year old now but I can't believe that after all of these years people are still actually questioning whether or not a bone stock LS1 F-body can hit the 12s LOL. Well, they can. 
I've even seen a bone stock '03 Corvette LS1 hit a 12.63 (Evan Smith ran a 12.66 years earlier in a '99 C5 hardtop as well).
Yes, that was the same car pictured in that link from 'Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords' (sister publication to 'GM High Tech Performance', they often shared articles) back on the first page of this thread, here it is:
Keep in mind that car was fully optioned, carrying almost a full tank of fuel and it was summertime.
I've even seen a bone stock '03 Corvette LS1 hit a 12.63 (Evan Smith ran a 12.66 years earlier in a '99 C5 hardtop as well).
Keep in mind that car was fully optioned, carrying almost a full tank of fuel and it was summertime.
07-21-2010, 10:35 AM
#60
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV NV
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So other then one guy.........with the screen name "unbelievablels1" and magazines.....no one has done it. The guy who said it may not be very bright but most of the people on this site are far behind him it seems.
I personally know of a magazine test that when published had far different numbers then I witnessed in person. It was a exotic car test, and they were all "adjusted" about a second. I dont know how the hitech perf test was done....but personally I give little credibility to all news information. I know the clocks said"12.xx" but I also know that the clocks can be corrected too.
So, so far.....exactly ONE guy has a 12 sec slip in a stock car.....yea they all run 12's....sure...
I personally know of a magazine test that when published had far different numbers then I witnessed in person. It was a exotic car test, and they were all "adjusted" about a second. I dont know how the hitech perf test was done....but personally I give little credibility to all news information. I know the clocks said"12.xx" but I also know that the clocks can be corrected too.
So, so far.....exactly ONE guy has a 12 sec slip in a stock car.....yea they all run 12's....sure...