New Drag Radial Personal Best: Full Weight + some streetcar setup 408/L92 results
#61
Banned
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh and BTW that was on a MT 275/60 drag radial. Link http://videos.streetfire.net/video/5...c-98f40152ebf9
But I wish I could hear the roar of that 408
#62
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#64
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm assuming that you run in the "Cheap Street" classes there in Texas??
I'm on the 325/50 M/T's, but would like to try the 10" tires sometime even though we don't have a small tire class around here..
I'm on the 325/50 M/T's, but would like to try the 10" tires sometime even though we don't have a small tire class around here..
#65
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lexington,S.C.
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heres a video of a 10.04 pass(6.30 1/8) in the heat of the day,guess that doesnt add up either. Dont have a 6.20 pass on video but will be glad to dig up a slip and post it.
Also a video of my wifes car, it ran a 6.35 this pass and 9.99 in the 1/4, its also been 6.2xx and 9.87 in the 1/4, I consider that barely in the 9's@515RWHP and 3400lb.'s...you do the math
white car 10.04 pass 1.38 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaOMwgwtUqY
10.05 pass with 1.42 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
wifes red car http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
Last edited by NOSJNKY; 06-17-2008 at 06:05 PM.
#66
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't know what "cheap street" is but we run in the Texas True 10.5 true street class which is on the MT drag radials.
#67
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Call what you want ole boy I've been doing this **** my whole life and have actually owned SEVERAL 8-9 sec cars. I was simply trying to offer some helpful advise. The white car has VERY little nitrous on it and does run what I said it does. The car is heavy and doesnt MPH(132), it made 474RWHP through the TH400 and 9"/ 612RWHP(N20) actually made less last time I dynoed it.
Heres a video of a 10.04 pass(6.30 1/8) in the heat of the day,guess that doesnt add up either. Dont have a 6.20 pass on video but will be glad to dig up a slip and post it.
Also a video of my wifes car, it ran a 6.35 this pass and 9.99 in the 1/4, its also been 6.2xx and 9.87 in the 1/4, I consider that barely in the 9's@515RWHP and 3400lb.'s...you do the math
white car 10.04 pass 1.38 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaOMwgwtUqY
10.05 pass with 1.42 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
wifes red car http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
Heres a video of a 10.04 pass(6.30 1/8) in the heat of the day,guess that doesnt add up either. Dont have a 6.20 pass on video but will be glad to dig up a slip and post it.
Also a video of my wifes car, it ran a 6.35 this pass and 9.99 in the 1/4, its also been 6.2xx and 9.87 in the 1/4, I consider that barely in the 9's@515RWHP and 3400lb.'s...you do the math
white car 10.04 pass 1.38 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaOMwgwtUqY
10.05 pass with 1.42 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
wifes red car http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
your 612 hp ran a what??? 6.30?
my 565rwhp ran a 6.60.....
seems like the difference is minimal.
Or the other.... 515rwhp with a nice 6.2 but the weight was 3400 and not 3690 (w/o driver)..... Seems like all I really need is suspension work (which I practically have none of) and hitting the nitrous converter with a larger shot off the line since the motor makes little lowend torque (gotta love big heads and a single plane intake).
Doesnt seem as bad as you said???
#68
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lexington,S.C.
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
your 612 hp ran a what??? 6.30?
my 565rwhp ran a 6.60.....
seems like the difference is minimal.
Or the other.... 515rwhp with a nice 6.2 but the weight was 3400 and not 3690 (w/o driver)..... Seems like all I really need is suspension work (which I practically have none of) and hitting the nitrous converter with a larger shot off the line since the motor makes little lowend torque (gotta love big heads and a single plane intake).
Doesnt seem as bad as you said???
my 565rwhp ran a 6.60.....
seems like the difference is minimal.
Or the other.... 515rwhp with a nice 6.2 but the weight was 3400 and not 3690 (w/o driver)..... Seems like all I really need is suspension work (which I practically have none of) and hitting the nitrous converter with a larger shot off the line since the motor makes little lowend torque (gotta love big heads and a single plane intake).
Doesnt seem as bad as you said???
My initial response was to the times on motor(7.7x's) but that could mostly be attributed to the converter/tune?? and the 6.81(N20) which in reality is a little off for for what you have. The 6.60 is certainly better ,2 or 3 tenths is not easy to pick up. The white car has been a best of 6.21 backed up by a 6.27 but will not go that every pass, the heat takes at least a half a tenth off. I was only reffering to the wifes red car for comparison sake(power to weight) and that its a NA car. As for dyno numbers they can vary from dyno to dyno,weather cond.,etc. I only compare my personal numbers for tuning purposes for variance reasons. As far as the thread goes I was only trying to offer some insight , as we have similar combinations and drive them regularly, not get tangled up in a internet argument.Good luck.
Last edited by NOSJNKY; 06-17-2008 at 10:24 PM.
#69
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Call what you want ole boy I've been doing this **** my whole life and have actually owned SEVERAL 8-9 sec cars. I was simply trying to offer some helpful advise. The white car has VERY little nitrous on it and does run what I said it does. The car is heavy and doesnt MPH(132), it made 474RWHP through the TH400 and 9"/ 612RWHP(N20) actually made less last time I dynoed it.
Heres a video of a 10.04 pass(6.30 1/8) in the heat of the day,guess that doesnt add up either. Dont have a 6.20 pass on video but will be glad to dig up a slip and post it.
Also a video of my wifes car, it ran a 6.35 this pass and 9.99 in the 1/4, its also been 6.2xx and 9.87 in the 1/4, I consider that barely in the 9's@515RWHP and 3400lb.'s...you do the math
white car 10.04 pass 1.38 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaOMwgwtUqY
10.05 pass with 1.42 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
wifes red car http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
Heres a video of a 10.04 pass(6.30 1/8) in the heat of the day,guess that doesnt add up either. Dont have a 6.20 pass on video but will be glad to dig up a slip and post it.
Also a video of my wifes car, it ran a 6.35 this pass and 9.99 in the 1/4, its also been 6.2xx and 9.87 in the 1/4, I consider that barely in the 9's@515RWHP and 3400lb.'s...you do the math
white car 10.04 pass 1.38 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaOMwgwtUqY
10.05 pass with 1.42 60' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
wifes red car http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa2X3C7Exzk
#71
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
the one time i ran on a .4 pro tree, yes, i did better. most were about the same, 2 passes were better than .074 off the footbrake. but it was a stock longblock a4 z28, nothing close to what you're running.
and it was originally a joke...that is a good reaction time. you sure are defensive.
and it was originally a joke...that is a good reaction time. you sure are defensive.
#72
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
the thread response here is totally lame
anyone have any real help?
kinda seems obvious to me there is a power issue, or a converter slip issue.
detail your tune up; try a different converter.. should be easy to find another 400 converter laying around.
congrats on your new best too! i know its hard moving a heavy car, and i'm impressed you've got it that heavy without haning forced induction on it.
anyone have any real help?
kinda seems obvious to me there is a power issue, or a converter slip issue.
detail your tune up; try a different converter.. should be easy to find another 400 converter laying around.
congrats on your new best too! i know its hard moving a heavy car, and i'm impressed you've got it that heavy without haning forced induction on it.
#73
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never said it was bad just that it seemed a little off. The suspension will certainly help a ton, I went from a 1.42 60' to a recent best of 1.36 by swithing to adj. QA1's, and with more nitrous, the car will respond better with a tighter converter.
My initial response was to the times on motor(7.7x's) but that could mostly be attributed to the converter/tune?? and the 6.81(N20) which in reality is a little off for for what you have. The 6.60 is certainly better ,2 or 3 tenths is not easy to pick up. The white car has been a best of 6.21 backed up by a 6.27 but will not go that every pass, the heat takes at least a half a tenth off. I was only reffering to the wifes red car for comparison sake(power to weight) and that its a NA car. As for dyno numbers they can vary from dyno to dyno,weather cond.,etc. I only compare my personal numbers for tuning purposes for variance reasons. As far as the thread goes I was only trying to offer some insight , as we have similar combinations and drive them regularly, not get tangled up in a internet argument.Good luck.
My initial response was to the times on motor(7.7x's) but that could mostly be attributed to the converter/tune?? and the 6.81(N20) which in reality is a little off for for what you have. The 6.60 is certainly better ,2 or 3 tenths is not easy to pick up. The white car has been a best of 6.21 backed up by a 6.27 but will not go that every pass, the heat takes at least a half a tenth off. I was only reffering to the wifes red car for comparison sake(power to weight) and that its a NA car. As for dyno numbers they can vary from dyno to dyno,weather cond.,etc. I only compare my personal numbers for tuning purposes for variance reasons. As far as the thread goes I was only trying to offer some insight , as we have similar combinations and drive them regularly, not get tangled up in a internet argument.Good luck.
the 7.7 was straight off the highway with 30psi tires and a 1.76 or so 60ft.... in 100 degree temps... It normally does 7.3-7.4 on motor.
As far as the 6.6 pass on slicks.... It should do better if it manages a 6.81 on those drag radials..... I think with the 150 shot I can get the car down to a 6.55-6.6 and on motor with the right converter as it sits around a 7.2-7.3 or better in October when it is not 100 degrees out. 70 degree temps is worth much on motor and not as much on nitrous, but my car runs better after a few passes normally.
Also your wife's C5R block and combination is much nicer than mine..... beer budget over here.
Still need to find out if removing the Eibachs would be wise or not.
#74
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the thread response here is totally lame
anyone have any real help?
kinda seems obvious to me there is a power issue, or a converter slip issue.
detail your tune up; try a different converter.. should be easy to find another 400 converter laying around.
congrats on your new best too! i know its hard moving a heavy car, and i'm impressed you've got it that heavy without haning forced induction on it.
anyone have any real help?
kinda seems obvious to me there is a power issue, or a converter slip issue.
detail your tune up; try a different converter.. should be easy to find another 400 converter laying around.
congrats on your new best too! i know its hard moving a heavy car, and i'm impressed you've got it that heavy without haning forced induction on it.
#75
Banned
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it just me, or is 265-270cc WAY OVERKILL for this type of motor. I mean, this is more-or-less a street/strip motor. That could explain why it picks up more with nitrous than it should....
#77
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the one time i ran on a .4 pro tree, yes, i did better. most were about the same, 2 passes were better than .074 off the footbrake. but it was a stock longblock a4 z28, nothing close to what you're running.
and it was originally a joke...that is a good reaction time. you sure are defensive.
and it was originally a joke...that is a good reaction time. you sure are defensive.
#78
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He has had it on the dyno. He's had shop problems which are straightened out now and I think it's finally starting to head in the right direction. It takes time and patience. He does need a better converter for sure.
#79
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arlington, Texas (Dallas Area)
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
No offense to anyone, but I agree with the "helping him out" comments. I run the SAME numbers he is right now with 346 NA H/C car! He needs to basically go through each and every aspect of his set-up and figure out why it runs those numbers. Until you get the 408 running right you should not even think of adding the nitrous! One thing at a time is a good method, and, a lot of times people never find the right combo. That's all it's about - You have to find the right mods that WORK CORRECTLY instead of putting something together because someone told you to. Most people never GET that. Then they ask, "Damn, how did you get that little 346 to run those numbers?" Let me tell you, it took years of research and mismatched parts to figure it out! That thing should run 10.50s with no bottle man! Good luck to you!
#80
Banned
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can't really compare your car to his since I imagine your car is alot lighter. What does your weigh? Do you have A/C, power steering, etc? Taking off accessories makes a big difference. I'm not defending, because obviously he has some bugs to work out. But comparing your car to his is definitely apples and oranges.