"CAM ONLY" setup, I want to use LS6 heads?
11-21-2009, 09:50 AM
#43
11-21-2009, 10:39 AM
#44
11 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got to side with Magnet on this one. This thread reminds me of this quote from the Big Lebowski:
http://www.entertonement.com/clips/x...-Dale-Gilmore-
http://www.entertonement.com/clips/x...-Dale-Gilmore-
11-21-2009, 11:20 AM
#45
common guys I know not everyone cares about somthing like this. No one is asking why you thing a list is stupid, and dumb, no need to go shitting this up.
I'm not calling you out rob at all, I know you have been open about that you have the LS6. Thats all I was asking about, if I could do it too
Most of the fastest times are 5 years old, ther so much better parts out now. Lighter suspention parts, light fab9s, front end spindles, arms, brakes. Better intake manifolds, TBs, headers, valvetrain, tunning. Why is the fastest times 5 years old still?
I'm not calling you out rob at all, I know you have been open about that you have the LS6. Thats all I was asking about, if I could do it too Most of the fastest times are 5 years old, ther so much better parts out now. Lighter suspention parts, light fab9s, front end spindles, arms, brakes. Better intake manifolds, TBs, headers, valvetrain, tunning. Why is the fastest times 5 years old still?
11-21-2009, 02:11 PM
#47
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
common guys I know not everyone cares about somthing like this. No one is asking why you thing a list is stupid, and dumb, no need to go shitting this up. I'm not calling you out rob at all, I know you have been open about that you have the LS6. Thats all I was asking about, if I could do it too
Most of the fastest times are 5 years old, ther so much better parts out now. Lighter suspention parts, light fab9s, front end spindles, arms, brakes. Better intake manifolds, TBs, headers, valvetrain, tunning. Why is the fastest times 5 years old still?
I'm not calling you out rob at all, I know you have been open about that you have the LS6. Thats all I was asking about, if I could do it too Most of the fastest times are 5 years old, ther so much better parts out now. Lighter suspention parts, light fab9s, front end spindles, arms, brakes. Better intake manifolds, TBs, headers, valvetrain, tunning. Why is the fastest times 5 years old still?
we need to get a group of the cam only cars but i am not cam only and race next year it sucks that the tracks by you a closed are tracks are still open i am going to GLD tomar. And yes please guys i am not trying to **** up this tread as well 
. 
11-22-2009, 08:38 AM
#52
I don't have it yet but I bet it is bigger then what I want for the stock heads. I already have the hp info from 4 other intakes for my car so I'll know just how it dose. I know my little streetsweeper 236/240 111 Lsa cam is not going to be ideal for it. I'm sure I'd go faster with the fast on this setup with somthing bigger too.
this is all I could find nothing for the injector bossed one 28095
Edelbrock 28097 1.08 2.74
this is all I could find nothing for the injector bossed one 28095
Edelbrock 28097 1.08 2.74
Last edited by studderin; 11-22-2009 at 08:56 AM.
11-22-2009, 09:31 AM
#53
I don't have it yet but I bet it is bigger then what I want for the stock heads. I already have the hp info from 4 other intakes for my car so I'll know just how it dose. I know my little streetsweeper 236/240 111 Lsa cam is not going to be ideal for it. I'm sure I'd go faster with the fast on this setup with somthing bigger too.
this is all I could find nothing for the injector bossed one 28095
Edelbrock 28097 1.08 2.74
this is all I could find nothing for the injector bossed one 28095
Edelbrock 28097 1.08 2.74
11-23-2009, 10:46 PM
#60
Not at 7000+ rpms. We're leaving the line at 7800 rpms. Our super vic is straight out of the box. I'm using it not because I felt it would make more power, I'm using it because I already had a 4150 style tb and it was cheaper than a fast. It did trap 132.75 mph this past weekend though...crossing the traps at about 7700 rpms. 
I just can't figure out how our 60ft times are only about .05 off the top cars which are also both 6 speeds and we have turned in the best mph on the list but somewhere we're giving up 3 tenths?
I'm hopeing we can get into the 10.30's with a few changes and some decent air would be nice...
I just can't figure out how our 60ft times are only about .05 off the top cars which are also both 6 speeds and we have turned in the best mph on the list but somewhere we're giving up 3 tenths? I'm hopeing we can get into the 10.30's with a few changes and some decent air would be nice...