should I change my pinion angle?
#1
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The car used to have poly lca bushings and I set pinion angle at -2.5 degrees.
I switched to rod end style lca's and added a anti roll bar on the rear. the front of the tq arm is still poly with BMR cross member mount/tranny crossmember.
I would think the rod ends have no give and my rear end would have less axle wrap under acceleration now. so maybe I need -1 or -2 degrees pinion angle. Any ideas? should I even change it?
I switched to rod end style lca's and added a anti roll bar on the rear. the front of the tq arm is still poly with BMR cross member mount/tranny crossmember.
I would think the rod ends have no give and my rear end would have less axle wrap under acceleration now. so maybe I need -1 or -2 degrees pinion angle. Any ideas? should I even change it?
#5
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I put the car on a 4 post drive on lift. then measure the driveshaft angle with my angle finder and write that down. then measure the bottom of my 12 bolt case on the TQ arm bracket and write that angle down and add the 2 together. I have a BMR TQ arm and the BMR how to video shows it that way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAQgLbhQ0uk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAQgLbhQ0uk
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We run -2 pinion angle off the pinion on the rear end only. We don't worry about driveline angle. Just throwing that out there for the extra info.
We use this same set-up on all of our cars we scale and square and that seems to be the winning combination for us. There are a few different ways to do the pinion angle, and they all seem to work. Our way is just faster, just as accurate, and works as well as the others (if not a little better).
We use this same set-up on all of our cars we scale and square and that seems to be the winning combination for us. There are a few different ways to do the pinion angle, and they all seem to work. Our way is just faster, just as accurate, and works as well as the others (if not a little better).
#11
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So you don't measeyre anything but the pinion angle as it would set on a level road with full weight on the tires? I'm just tryingto clarify, I may try setting mine up like that too
#12
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The madman way is how I always did mine. Check the ground, make sure it's level, and check the rear end and see where it is compared to the ground.
I did run mine at -1 fwiw and it worked for me.. I tried it at 0, -1, -2, -3 and none of them ever made it any better or worse then the -1 did so I put it back to -1
When the suspension doesn't deflect much it isn't as critical to have the angle in the rear.
I did run mine at -1 fwiw and it worked for me.. I tried it at 0, -1, -2, -3 and none of them ever made it any better or worse then the -1 did so I put it back to -1
When the suspension doesn't deflect much it isn't as critical to have the angle in the rear.
#17
12 Second Club
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Catlettsburg, Ky
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Would it work to put a magnetic angle finder on the harmonic balancer, get a reading (example -4) then put it on the t/a mounting surface, or the u joint cap (since they are machined parallel to the joint itself) and take a reading (example: -2). Which would give you downward angle difference of 2*.
#19
12 Second Club
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Catlettsburg, Ky
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That method works fine when trying to make an adjustment from a predetermined setting, but if you're putting on a new torque arm or other suspension part, and you're looking for this general "-2*" setting, you can't use the ground as a reference unless your driveline is parallel to the ground as well.
#20
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wrong.... I set it to -1.5 on everything regardless to any of that and have yet to see any change, on any 4th gen car I've touched.
These are not leaf spring cars and don't need a bunch of pinion angle. If you have rod ended/solid mounted suspension the rear does not deflect.
If you have so much rake in the chassis, that the engine isn't parallel, or pretty close to it then your ride height is jacked up and needs to be fixed....
People get all "pinion angle pinion angle" and it has little to no effect with these cars... only thing you want to adjust it for is to make sure that the u joints aren't getting hammered... more pinion angle you have the more mechanical bind you have in the driveline, that's the only thing that you're trying to do with the pinion angle.. make sure that during the movement of the suspension the u joints stay as close to strait as you can get them. That's it.
These are not leaf spring cars and don't need a bunch of pinion angle. If you have rod ended/solid mounted suspension the rear does not deflect.
If you have so much rake in the chassis, that the engine isn't parallel, or pretty close to it then your ride height is jacked up and needs to be fixed....
People get all "pinion angle pinion angle" and it has little to no effect with these cars... only thing you want to adjust it for is to make sure that the u joints aren't getting hammered... more pinion angle you have the more mechanical bind you have in the driveline, that's the only thing that you're trying to do with the pinion angle.. make sure that during the movement of the suspension the u joints stay as close to strait as you can get them. That's it.