Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2005 IHRA Rule Update - T-Top treated same as Vert.!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2004, 08:02 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Plum Crazy Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wichita, KS - 1400' above sea level ;-)
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Insanely
Hokey
Rollbar
Association
Old 11-17-2004, 08:55 PM
  #22  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Villain281H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Florida # of drag strips runs: ?!?!?
Posts: 8,834
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by XFiveLiter
Close but 87 was the last year for t-top Mustangs.
Sure? My buddy had an 88 model GT with T-tops, but I could be wrong on the year...
Old 11-17-2004, 10:19 PM
  #23  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
98TAauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Warsaw, Va
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I contacted Mike Baker at IHRA and he's adjusted the rule for T top cars to 12.25 now. He was informed that stock LS1's can run those numbers and tracks will loose money/attendence since guys with cars running mid 12's to low 13's arent going to cut up there cars to slap roll bars in to make a few passes. Im trying to get him to move this down to 11.99, but 12.25 is definitly better than 13.49!!!

Rollbar / Rollcage: A minimum of a 6 point roll bar is mandatory all convertibles running 11.00 to 13.49 ¼ mile and on T-top entries running 12.25 or quicker 1/4 and 8.25 or quicker 1/8 mile. A roll cage is mandatory on any entry that exceeds 135 mph
so stay tuned and hopefully it gets dropped to 11.99
Old 11-18-2004, 05:56 AM
  #24  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Villain281H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Florida # of drag strips runs: ?!?!?
Posts: 8,834
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

they need to drop that 8.25 1/8 mile time down as well. An 1/8 mile that equates to a 12.25 1/4 mile is about 7.70s not 8.25.
Old 11-18-2004, 06:46 AM
  #25  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Plum Crazy Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wichita, KS - 1400' above sea level ;-)
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98TAauto
I contacted Mike Baker at IHRA and he's adjusted the rule for T top cars to 12.25 now. He was informed that stock LS1's can run those numbers and tracks will loose money/attendence since guys with cars running mid 12's to low 13's arent going to cut up there cars to slap roll bars in to make a few passes. Im trying to get him to move this down to 11.99, but 12.25 is definitly better than 13.49!!!



so stay tuned and hopefully it gets dropped to 11.99
So what exactly has IHRA determined is wrong with T-top cars that insurance
companies did not??? Last time I checked my agent, he didn't ask me whether
I had the death-defying T-top option before writing coverage...
Old 11-18-2004, 08:36 AM
  #26  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
98TAauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Warsaw, Va
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that I do not know... they just said they were dropping the et limit to 12.25 in the 1/4th.

i dunno what they were smoking this year but the rule atleast needs to be 11.99
Old 11-18-2004, 11:25 AM
  #27  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Windy City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Elgin, IL
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

11.99 isn't enough, not when the NHRA found t-top cars should be treated the same as hard tops and also lowered their roll bar requirement to 11.49. Bolt-on LS1's easily run low 12's - high 11's.

As I already said, this will only result in more cars racing on the street rather than the track.

I drive my car daily and I don't have an option to install a roll bar. I drive my two kids to day care every morning and a roll bar would make the back seat dangerous. I've built my car to run mid-11's, right where the roll bar rule used to be. Changing the rule to 12.25 is a knee-jerk that throws me onto the street for the only place besides a very busy NHRA track to have fun.

I think this a move in the wrong direction for the IHRA and our local tracks.
Old 11-18-2004, 11:38 AM
  #28  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Windy City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Elgin, IL
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another thing I'll add, a 6-pt roll bar provides no additional support under the t-top portion of the roof. The main hoop of a roll bar resides under the b-pillar and roofline, offering the same support as it would in a hard top car. The portion of the roof that'll be protected with a roll bar is just as strong in a T-top car as it is in a hard top car.

Since a roll bar doesn't add any additional protection to the area affected by T-tops, why force stricter requirements for T-top cars?
Old 11-18-2004, 04:34 PM
  #29  
TECH Senior Member
 
horist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lake Zurich, IL
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Woah... so IHRA is getting more strict
and NHRA is getting more lenient??

Beginning Jan. 1, 2005, a roll bar and an SFI 16.1 driver-restraint system will be mandatory on any vehicle running 11.49 or quicker and for convertibles running 13.49 or quicker. An SFI 3.2A/1 jacket will be mandatory for all drivers in vehicles running between 10.00 to 11.49 seconds. On any car running 11.49 or quicker, a flywheel and clutch meeting SFI Spec 1.1 or 1.2 and a flywheel shield meeting SFI Spec 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, or 9.1 will be mandatory. A driveshaft loop will be required on all cars running 13.99 or quicker and utilizing slicks, except vehicles equipped with street tires running 11.49 or slower.
http://www.nhra.com/2004/news/november/110102.html
Old 11-18-2004, 04:48 PM
  #30  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
epic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NW Burbs, IL
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default



So weak. I want to keep the value of my car.
Old 11-18-2004, 04:49 PM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
 
horist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lake Zurich, IL
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by epic


So weak. I want to keep the value of my car.
4th gen F-Bodies have value? Please forward this value information to the folks at Kelly's Blue Book
Old 11-18-2004, 04:52 PM
  #32  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
epic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NW Burbs, IL
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

YOUR car may not, but mine has some.

It reduces the value in my mind. That's what is important.

IHRA
Old 11-18-2004, 06:08 PM
  #33  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
SMOKIN01TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: McComb, MS
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by epic
YOUR car may not, but mine has some.

It reduces the value in my mind. That's what is important.

IHRA
bolt in with swingouts, makes life nice and can be removed with lil trace of existance
Old 11-18-2004, 06:23 PM
  #34  
'Bird Director
iTrader: (80)
 
y2k_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Central Indiana Honors: 4th grade spelling bee contestant
Posts: 12,825
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98TAauto
I contacted Mike Baker at IHRA and he's adjusted the rule for T top cars to 12.25 now. He was informed that stock LS1's can run those numbers and tracks will loose money/attendence since guys with cars running mid 12's to low 13's arent going to cut up there cars to slap roll bars in to make a few passes. Im trying to get him to move this down to 11.99, but 12.25 is definitly better than 13.49!!!

so stay tuned and hopefully it gets dropped to 11.99
Wow...sounds like they're really in touch with the modern factory performance car market. I'm even more glad that I'm an NHRA member now.
Old 11-18-2004, 08:07 PM
  #35  
TECH Resident
 
XFiveLiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Schererville, IN
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Villain281H
Sure? My buddy had an 88 model GT with T-tops, but I could be wrong on the year...
Pretty sure, not 100%. I haven't owned a Mustang for a long time so I might be a little off.
Old 11-18-2004, 09:25 PM
  #36  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
98TAauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Warsaw, Va
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by y2k_ta
Wow...sounds like they're really in touch with the modern factory performance car market. I'm even more glad that I'm an NHRA member now.

haha I know. The only thing that sucks is the closest NHRA track is about an hour north of the IHRA track we like out here

my car needs a roll bar anyway and I have one waiting to go in, but the rule still sucks for those SI guys trying to break into the 11's with as little weight as possible

i still havent heard back from them so hopefully they are discussing this further
Old 11-18-2004, 09:51 PM
  #37  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by XFiveLiter
Pretty sure, not 100%. I haven't owned a Mustang for a long time so I might be a little off.
'88 was the last year, but if you wanted an '88 t-top you had to get it early. Ford stopped the t-top option early in the '88 model year.
Old 11-19-2004, 06:38 AM
  #38  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
Tim98TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: From the Bowels of Hell!!! You want some of me bitch?!?!?!
Posts: 3,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SMOKIN01TA
npr dont seem to be that worried about my car anyway for some reason, its nice knowing all the track guys.
Hey Rotney, it doesn't matter WHO techs you car in. If there is a problem and you have an accident and your car wasn't supposed to pass tech, the track is in deep **** and the tech guy is outta work. Trust me, you ain't all that.
Old 11-19-2004, 08:13 AM
  #39  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
badpewter-z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: RI
Posts: 5,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well rule has offically been lifted
10.00 to 11.49

Rollcage: Add at the end of the section, A rollcage is mandatory on all convertibles running 10.99 or quicker ¼ or 6.99 or quicker 1/8 mile. T-top vehicles follow convertible guidelines.

11.50 to 13.49 section

Rollbar / Rollcage: A minimum of a 6 point roll bar is mandatory all convertibles running 11.00 to 13.49 ¼ mile and 8.25 or quicker 1/8 mile. A roll cage is mandatory on any entry that exceeds 135 mph.
Old 11-19-2004, 11:08 AM
  #40  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

that still blows for us in the 10.00-10.99 range...


Quick Reply: 2005 IHRA Rule Update - T-Top treated same as Vert.!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.