weight & random questions
The big advantage is strength. The mild steel rear mount plate on the old TA was tearing. One or two more wheels up launches and it would not have stayed connected to the rear end. That would have messed up my day a lot. Also the tunability of the new TA and LCAs will be a big benefit. Instead of having just pinion angle, I will have a wide range of tuneability in the TA.
Is it worth starting over? Not sure. I had no option. Just glad it will be done before the mild steel stuff failed.
If you are talking to Burkhart ask Dave for the pictures of my rear TA mount.
I don't think you will lose a LOT of weight with the Fab 9 and the 'Moly stuff but every lb counts.
Mustangeater, can you please send me a few pics of your Burkhart torque arm? Thanks!!
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
So if you are talking full suspension, t/a, cage and all from CM over MS then you could save a decent chunk of weight, for example if all that stuff in MS adds up to 200# then the same stuff in CM will be ~132# and stronger...
I did a lot of research before even doing my SFC's and got a custom set in CM and thay came out only adding 10# total to the car...
IMO a chrome moly part isnt that much stronger since the tubing thickness is less, now if both tubes were the same thickness the CM would be stronger but it would also weigh the same

Depending on the application and where the part is used I think mild steel is sometimes a better way to go since its easier to work with and less prone to failure at the welds if not done perfect..
What kind of torque arm did you have? I'm still on a randon tech stock style and a lot of 1.2x 60 foots and its fine - its about as mild steel of a bracket as you can get


