One tenth reduction in 60ft equals.....?
One tenth reduction in 60ft equals.....? On average, what does:
one tenth
two tenths
three tenths
reduction in 60ft times equate to in et reduction. I know it's more than a 1:1 ratio, but does anyone know what it'd be ?
Say you ran a 1.86 60ft en route to a 11.37 ET, what whould a 1.76 60ft get you? A 1.66 60ft? A 1.56 60ft....you get the picture.
one tenth
two tenths
three tenths
reduction in 60ft times equate to in et reduction. I know it's more than a 1:1 ratio, but does anyone know what it'd be ?
Say you ran a 1.86 60ft en route to a 11.37 ET, what whould a 1.76 60ft get you? A 1.66 60ft? A 1.56 60ft....you get the picture.
So , does that make it .1=.2, and .2=.4, right....so , where is the point of diminished returns? Is there a point where no matter how low you get your 60ft, you won't get a lower ET? I guess thats a hp/aerodynamic question,there.
Trending Topics
On average, what does:
one tenth
two tenths
three tenths
reduction in 60ft times equate to in et reduction. I know it's more than a 1:1 ratio, but does anyone know what it'd be ?
Say you ran a 1.86 60ft en route to a 11.37 ET, what whould a 1.76 60ft get you? A 1.66 60ft? A 1.56 60ft....you get the picture.
one tenth
two tenths
three tenths
reduction in 60ft times equate to in et reduction. I know it's more than a 1:1 ratio, but does anyone know what it'd be ?
Say you ran a 1.86 60ft en route to a 11.37 ET, what whould a 1.76 60ft get you? A 1.66 60ft? A 1.56 60ft....you get the picture.
1.86 with an 11.37 would be a super bad 60ft, 11.37 should be about a 1.5 50ft. around 117 mph. If you ran a 1.86 with 11.37 et you'd be running like 130 mph
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'
Brett Foote
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
I ran a bit over 124mph for the 11.37 and the 1.86 60ft.
i need for 60 in my dies and 10s NA here we come 
10 Second Club
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley, California
Suppose a stock F-body has a 2-second sixty and a 13-second ET. A Pro Stock car has a sixty time near one second and a 6.8 second ET. Can you therefore conclude that one second off your sixty is more than 6 seconds off your ET?
The .1 = .2 or .1 = .15 theories have never worked for me. When the 60 ft was .05 better the ET was .05 better also. When it was .1 better the ET was .1 better too. My car is super consistant and I have watched this happen many times.
6 & 8 Second Club
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 0
From: Illinois, RT 66 dragway area
It only works on the same car & engine. You can't change 1000 variables & get an accurate result.
.
The first 60 ft takes more time to travel than any other measurement in the 1/4 mile and is the most important, obviously if you gained .05 in the 60ft and only went .05 fast in the 1/4 it wasn't as good of a run after the 1st 60ft.
There is no set number .1 60ft = .2 1/4, but all things being equal any improvement in 60ft should produce a gain of more than 1-1 in the 1/4 ET.
If you improve .05 in the 60ft you should always gain more than .05 in the 1/4 mile.
The first 60 ft takes more time to travel than any other measurement in the 1/4 mile and is the most important, obviously if you gained .05 in the 60ft and only went .05 fast in the 1/4 it wasn't as good of a run after the 1st 60ft.
There is no set number .1 60ft = .2 1/4, but all things being equal any improvement in 60ft should produce a gain of more than 1-1 in the 1/4 ET.
The first 60 ft takes more time to travel than any other measurement in the 1/4 mile and is the most important, obviously if you gained .05 in the 60ft and only went .05 fast in the 1/4 it wasn't as good of a run after the 1st 60ft.
There is no set number .1 60ft = .2 1/4, but all things being equal any improvement in 60ft should produce a gain of more than 1-1 in the 1/4 ET.
If the 60 ft improvement is due to more power I can see the theories working but if it's due to just better traction , as it was in my case, the improvement will be linear.
Looking at the time slips, the intervals between the 60 ft and 330, 330 to 1/8th mile and so on all stayed more or less the same on the runs which means the runs after the 60 ft were more or less identical. The only difference would be the 60 ft time and that exact difference would show up in my final ET within a 100th of a second or so.
If the 60 ft improvement is due to more power I can see the theories working but if it's due to just better traction , as it was in my case, the improvement will be linear.
If the 60 ft improvement is due to more power I can see the theories working but if it's due to just better traction , as it was in my case, the improvement will be linear.
If you pick up .05 in the 60ft and run the same ET at the 330, that meant it went .05 slower from the 60ft to the 330 mark, which without a doubt means the car went slower from 60ft to 330.
60ft time with all things working will always be greater than 1 to 1 for the simple fact it takes the longest to travel the 1st 60ft so the gain at the end of the track will be greater than just the gain at the 60ft mark.
Take two cars that run the identical ET down to the .00001
Have one run a 60ft .1 faster, if you think you'll just have to run .1 faster in the 1/4 to catch him you're wrong.