Very impressed with my dyno results from my 01 Trans-Am WS6
10-21-2008, 11:25 AM
#1
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Saylorsburg, PA
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very impressed with my dyno results from my 01 Trans-Am WS6 Sunday I got my car dyno'd, it an 01 Trans-Am WS6 M6. Mods are:
Pacesetter LT's
Pacesetter ORY
SLP Loudmouth w/ no resonator
SLP Lid
SLP smooth air bellow
WS6 Store short-throw
Well my car put down 360RWHP and 365 ft-lbs. on a dynojet! They said it was one of the strongest running bolt-on LS1's that they have seen. Here are pics of my dyno chart and my dyno video:
My bolt-on 01 Trans-Am WS6 M6 on the dyno - 360RWH
Pacesetter LT's
Pacesetter ORY
SLP Loudmouth w/ no resonator
SLP Lid
SLP smooth air bellow
WS6 Store short-throw
Well my car put down 360RWHP and 365 ft-lbs. on a dynojet! They said it was one of the strongest running bolt-on LS1's that they have seen. Here are pics of my dyno chart and my dyno video:
10-21-2008, 12:31 PM
#3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice, that sorta matches my graph, on a dynojet, i put don 360/373 with
hooker lt
hooker ory
corsa catback
LID
and heavy *** 17x11 TT2s
and
370/385 on a dyanpack
hooker lt
hooker ory
corsa catback
LID
and heavy *** 17x11 TT2s
and
370/385 on a dyanpack
10-21-2008, 06:34 PM
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you're telling me an LS1 with a lid and headers puts down 360rwhp? That's impressive. I'd be curious to see what you'd put down on my local dyno considering my tuned LQ9 put down a meager 267 rwhp pathetic lol (converter was unlocked, I was told to expect roughly 20rwhp higher with it locked).
Trending Topics
10-21-2008, 09:34 PM
#8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18013
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the dyno is pretty accurate. 2 other bolt on LS1 cars, all full exhaust and lid. the 6 speed car made 340, the auto car made 330. 01 ta's car is a freak. a stock 03 mach 1 put down 280 rwhp.
10-22-2008, 10:19 AM
#17
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18013
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the car was making ~5 more hp across the board the second time it was pulled and the second pull started way after the torque peak.
quit nit picking.
10-22-2008, 10:31 AM
#18
so if you started a dyno at 2500 rpm and got a peak torque of 400 ft lbs at 4800 rpm and 400 hp at 6400, the next run there were issues with spark pickup and it started at 5500 rpm. the torque at that rpm was 380 and the hp peak moved up to 405, you would say 405 hp and 380 ft lbs?
the car was making ~5 more hp across the board the second time it was pulled and the second pull started way after the torque peak.
quit nit picking.
the car was making ~5 more hp across the board the second time it was pulled and the second pull started way after the torque peak.
quit nit picking.
you take the best run out of how many pulls there were. those are you numbers. you dont make 4 pulls and then piece together the highest numbers...
ill put it into perspective for you. if you install a cam and prior to putting it on the dyno you ran 388/375. those are your current numbers. now after dialing in the tune you come out to 419/395 those then become your new numbers. now if there was a run inbetween that was 413/402, that means there is some tuning left on the table (running a little rich). final numbers would still end up being 419/395...
it's not nit-picking its being honest. this is a perfect example of mis-information...
10-22-2008, 10:39 AM
#19
Nice runs. I'd like to see an SAE number but compared to those other cars on the dyno, sounds like it pulls hard.
I also don't understand why everyone talks about SAE on different temperature days.
The whole point of the SAE correction is to take into consideration temperature, air quality, elevation, etc, etc. If you have SAE numbers, it doesn't matter whether you ran the car on a dry 55 degree day or a humid 100 degree day; they are already corrected for that.
I also don't understand why everyone talks about SAE on different temperature days.
The whole point of the SAE correction is to take into consideration temperature, air quality, elevation, etc, etc. If you have SAE numbers, it doesn't matter whether you ran the car on a dry 55 degree day or a humid 100 degree day; they are already corrected for that.
10-22-2008, 10:41 AM
#20
you address the issue and then re-dyno the car. you disgard the run because you know its not accurate...
you take the best run out of how many pulls there were. those are you numbers. you dont make 4 pulls and then piece together the highest numbers...
ill put it into perspective for you. if you install a cam and prior to putting it on the dyno you ran 388/375. those are your current numbers. now after dialing in the tune you come out to 419/395 those then become your new numbers. now if there was a run inbetween that was 413/402, that means there is some tuning left on the table (running a little rich). final numbers would still end up being 419/395...
it's not nit-picking its being honest. this is a perfect example of mis-information...
you take the best run out of how many pulls there were. those are you numbers. you dont make 4 pulls and then piece together the highest numbers...
ill put it into perspective for you. if you install a cam and prior to putting it on the dyno you ran 388/375. those are your current numbers. now after dialing in the tune you come out to 419/395 those then become your new numbers. now if there was a run inbetween that was 413/402, that means there is some tuning left on the table (running a little rich). final numbers would still end up being 419/395...
it's not nit-picking its being honest. this is a perfect example of mis-information...
