Dyno Results: MS3, 5.3L Heads, Fast 92
#62
I just got an 02 ws6, can you explain how this is true? Im really scared on damaging the engine as most if not all the work wont be done myself and labour is such a rip off. It has a H/C package so the high revving will be usefull for its power curve. I havent brought it past 5700-5900 so far though as im so paranoid and also cause it spins the 315 nittos in first gear with 3.23s with only about 60-70% throttle lol so it was still plenty fast but definetely not near its potential Thanks!
Last edited by SimRacer1; 02-08-2009 at 10:04 PM.
#64
Checked out this ET Calc and it says I should be trapping 117 at my weight. You guys saying this is way wrong?
http://www.rpmoutlet.com/dyno.htm
http://www.rpmoutlet.com/dyno.htm
#65
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
I just got an 02 ws6, can you explain how this is true? Im really scared on damaging the engine as most if not all the work wont be done myself and labour is such a rip off. It has a H/C package so the high revving will be usefull for its power curve. I havent brought it past 5700-5900 so far though as im so paranoid and also cause it spins the 315 nittos in first gear with 3.23s with only about 60-70% throttle lol so it was still plenty fast but definetely not near its potential Thanks!
#67
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Checked out this ET Calc and it says I should be trapping 117 at my weight. You guys saying this is way wrong?
http://www.rpmoutlet.com/dyno.htm
http://www.rpmoutlet.com/dyno.htm
#69
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Hey Jay !!!
Hi Jay !!!
We did the Car here in Denver.
Here is the origional Post last year about his car. http://www.coloradolsx.com/forum/vie...php?f=23&t=760
MS3, 5.3 L Heads, Compression 10.75 to 1, Ported Fast 92/92 combo, TSP 1 7/8" Headers and off road Y Pipe, stock maf. Car always had nice power.
Car put down 461RWHP and 400RWTQ with a stock 10 bolt. Timing and a/f was good. DynoJet SAE corrected.
A few months later, Jay went to a 9" and a 85mm MAF, the car lost a little HP from the 9", Power went to 446RWHP 384RWTQ.
After moving to CA, I'm sure your tune needed a touch up from going from 7000da to sealevel, I'm glad you were able to get some more power out of her Jay, congrads !
Clint
We did the Car here in Denver.
Here is the origional Post last year about his car. http://www.coloradolsx.com/forum/vie...php?f=23&t=760
MS3, 5.3 L Heads, Compression 10.75 to 1, Ported Fast 92/92 combo, TSP 1 7/8" Headers and off road Y Pipe, stock maf. Car always had nice power.
Car put down 461RWHP and 400RWTQ with a stock 10 bolt. Timing and a/f was good. DynoJet SAE corrected.
A few months later, Jay went to a 9" and a 85mm MAF, the car lost a little HP from the 9", Power went to 446RWHP 384RWTQ.
After moving to CA, I'm sure your tune needed a touch up from going from 7000da to sealevel, I'm glad you were able to get some more power out of her Jay, congrads !
Clint
Last edited by HUGGER ORANGE SS; 02-17-2009 at 04:11 AM.
#70
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Jay !!!
We did the Car here in Denver.
Here is the origional Post last year about his car. http://www.coloradolsx.com/forum/vie...php?f=23&t=760
MS3, 5.3 L Heads, Compression 10.75 to 1, Ported Fast 92/92 combo, TSP 1 7/8" Headers and off road Y Pipe, stock maf. Car always had nice power.
Car put down 461RWHP and 400RWTQ with a stock 10 bolt. Timing and a/f was good. DynoJet SAE corrected.
A few months later, Jay went to a 9" and a 85mm MAF, the car lost a little HP from the 9", Power went to 446RWHP 384RWTQ.
After moving to CA, I'm sure your tune needed a touch up from going from 7000da to sealevel, I'm glad you were able to get some more power out of her Jay, congrads !
Clint
We did the Car here in Denver.
Here is the origional Post last year about his car. http://www.coloradolsx.com/forum/vie...php?f=23&t=760
MS3, 5.3 L Heads, Compression 10.75 to 1, Ported Fast 92/92 combo, TSP 1 7/8" Headers and off road Y Pipe, stock maf. Car always had nice power.
Car put down 461RWHP and 400RWTQ with a stock 10 bolt. Timing and a/f was good. DynoJet SAE corrected.
A few months later, Jay went to a 9" and a 85mm MAF, the car lost a little HP from the 9", Power went to 446RWHP 384RWTQ.
After moving to CA, I'm sure your tune needed a touch up from going from 7000da to sealevel, I'm glad you were able to get some more power out of her Jay, congrads !
Clint
#71
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stockbridge, MI
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm looking at this exact set-up only with Fast 90/90 unported. How "streetable" is this set-up. My car isnt going to be a race car, or a daily driver, but will fally somewhere in between. Can i still drive this car around in Detroit Traffic. I dont mind it being a little more tempermental, but i still want to be able to drive my car to work on nice fridays and such. That still possible? Sorry for the hijack.
#72
Hi Jay !!!
We did the Car here in Denver.
Here is the origional Post last year about his car. http://www.coloradolsx.com/forum/vie...php?f=23&t=760
MS3, 5.3 L Heads, Compression 10.75 to 1, Ported Fast 92/92 combo, TSP 1 7/8" Headers and off road Y Pipe, stock maf. Car always had nice power.
Car put down 461RWHP and 400RWTQ with a stock 10 bolt. Timing and a/f was good. DynoJet SAE corrected.
A few months later, Jay went to a 9" and a 85mm MAF, the car lost a little HP from the 9", Power went to 446RWHP 384RWTQ.
After moving to CA, I'm sure your tune needed a touch up from going from 7000da to sealevel, I'm glad you were able to get some more power out of her Jay, congrads !
Clint
We did the Car here in Denver.
Here is the origional Post last year about his car. http://www.coloradolsx.com/forum/vie...php?f=23&t=760
MS3, 5.3 L Heads, Compression 10.75 to 1, Ported Fast 92/92 combo, TSP 1 7/8" Headers and off road Y Pipe, stock maf. Car always had nice power.
Car put down 461RWHP and 400RWTQ with a stock 10 bolt. Timing and a/f was good. DynoJet SAE corrected.
A few months later, Jay went to a 9" and a 85mm MAF, the car lost a little HP from the 9", Power went to 446RWHP 384RWTQ.
After moving to CA, I'm sure your tune needed a touch up from going from 7000da to sealevel, I'm glad you were able to get some more power out of her Jay, congrads !
Clint
@deelong4002: I drove my car from Colorado back here to Cali and am currently driving it everyday all around socal. I'd say it's daily drivable.
#75
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
Hi Jay !!!
We did the Car here in Denver.
Here is the origional Post last year about his car. http://www.coloradolsx.com/forum/vie...php?f=23&t=760
MS3, 5.3 L Heads, Compression 10.75 to 1, Ported Fast 92/92 combo, TSP 1 7/8" Headers and off road Y Pipe, stock maf. Car always had nice power.
Car put down 461RWHP and 400RWTQ with a stock 10 bolt. Timing and a/f was good. DynoJet SAE corrected.
A few months later, Jay went to a 9" and a 85mm MAF, the car lost a little HP from the 9", Power went to 446RWHP 384RWTQ.
After moving to CA, I'm sure your tune needed a touch up from going from 7000da to sealevel, I'm glad you were able to get some more power out of her Jay, congrads !
Clint
We did the Car here in Denver.
Here is the origional Post last year about his car. http://www.coloradolsx.com/forum/vie...php?f=23&t=760
MS3, 5.3 L Heads, Compression 10.75 to 1, Ported Fast 92/92 combo, TSP 1 7/8" Headers and off road Y Pipe, stock maf. Car always had nice power.
Car put down 461RWHP and 400RWTQ with a stock 10 bolt. Timing and a/f was good. DynoJet SAE corrected.
A few months later, Jay went to a 9" and a 85mm MAF, the car lost a little HP from the 9", Power went to 446RWHP 384RWTQ.
After moving to CA, I'm sure your tune needed a touch up from going from 7000da to sealevel, I'm glad you were able to get some more power out of her Jay, congrads !
Clint
Last edited by Spectre86; 04-14-2009 at 05:51 PM.