Want trq in a H/C 346? See results
#1
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
Want trq in a H/C 346? See results
Here are the results of a very streetable setup without huge cams or too much overlap.
cam is 230/228 .612/.588 110-1 LSA
Not bad for a retarded setup
Thank you rmtt
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-do-heads.html
cam is 230/228 .612/.588 110-1 LSA
Not bad for a retarded setup
Thank you rmtt
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-do-heads.html
Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; 04-19-2009 at 11:06 AM.
Trending Topics
#16
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
#18
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Grand Prairie, TX
Posts: 5,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are the results of a very streetable setup without huge cams or too much overlap.
cam is 230/228 .612/.588 110-1 LSA
Not bad for a retarded setup
Thank you rmtt
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-do-heads.html
cam is 230/228 .612/.588 110-1 LSA
Not bad for a retarded setup
Thank you rmtt
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-do-heads.html
#19
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
U will never convince me that a reverse grind cam will carry power. Reverse grinds are band-aids to a setup that has issues someone has yet to find...Intake restriction, exhaust restriction etc. Find those with a normal split cam or square cam and it will make more power then reverse grinds. Keep continuing the band-aids...its making someone cheap money.
I had more peak HP/Tq, way more hp/tq under the curve, and mine carried longer than most of the cars that have been on the same dyno with traditional split cams (larger than mine) and name brand aftermarket heads. I know because we overlayed the graphs.
I think it carried just fine for how far we spun the engine. The graph is proof. I personally don't see my setup as having an issue.
#20
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Grand Prairie, TX
Posts: 5,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's my car.
I had more peak HP/Tq, way more hp/tq under the curve, and mine carried longer than most of the cars that have been on the same dyno with traditional split cams (larger than mine) and name brand aftermarket heads. I know because we overlayed the graphs.
I think it carried just fine for how far we spun the engine. The graph is proof. I personally don't see my setup as having an issue.
I had more peak HP/Tq, way more hp/tq under the curve, and mine carried longer than most of the cars that have been on the same dyno with traditional split cams (larger than mine) and name brand aftermarket heads. I know because we overlayed the graphs.
I think it carried just fine for how far we spun the engine. The graph is proof. I personally don't see my setup as having an issue.