5.3 heads and ms3 cam #s
05-07-2009, 06:36 PM
#22
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Big Terrible Texas
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
These same people do this in every TSP thread, I think Jason is completely in line to point out when *** hats like them can't chill out until a graph is posted.
Nice numbers man, pretty high if I might say so myself considering I have the exact same set up but with a FAST. Post a graph and shut these people up.
Nice numbers man, pretty high if I might say so myself considering I have the exact same set up but with a FAST. Post a graph and shut these people up.
05-07-2009, 06:39 PM
#23
Ed welcome to ls1tech. I just can't help but notice it's always the same few people from the same site like to follow a similar pattern...
I agree something doesnt seem right with the dyno numbers, but he's happy & when the customers happy that's what counts.
I agree something doesnt seem right with the dyno numbers, but he's happy & when the customers happy that's what counts.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
05-07-2009, 06:49 PM
#24
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Working in the shop 24/7
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Thanks... our buddy Patrick took it on the chin and asked me to come back... I wonder about his sanity. 
I guess it's OK to question stuff as long as it doesn't get nasty. As you know, it does get *heated* sometimes... I think the guys just questioned the numbers and since no dyno sheet was provided, they did have some validity to ask... WTF do I know anyway, my **** gets questioned by people on this forum too so alls fair. 
Well we all can agree then... something is weird... Fun car? Sure but let's be realistic... the TQ number sounded off base...
See ya at HCLS1...
I just can't help but notice it's always the same few people from the same site like to follow a similar pattern...
I agree something doesnt seem right with the dyno numbers, but he's happy & when the customers happy that's what counts.
See ya at HCLS1...
The following users liked this post:
JONZFRC (08-03-2019)
05-07-2009, 07:00 PM
#25
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Um...wow...REALLY nice numbers!
I dont mean to offend the OP, I understand ones car is very near and dear to ones heart, but that seems a little bit on the high side. If nothing else why not test it on another dyno? i dont expect OP to as its money out of pocket and he has nothing to prove to anyone, but those are 383 numbers, not 346 whit budget H/C.
Regardless I too use TSP products, and for the money you cant beat them!
I dont mean to offend the OP, I understand ones car is very near and dear to ones heart, but that seems a little bit on the high side. If nothing else why not test it on another dyno? i dont expect OP to as its money out of pocket and he has nothing to prove to anyone, but those are 383 numbers, not 346 whit budget H/C.
Regardless I too use TSP products, and for the money you cant beat them!
05-07-2009, 07:08 PM
#27
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Frostburg, MD 21532
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know that the numbers are high. They told me that the dyno was off a bit. Plus it was 68 degrees that day. I'm sure that helped. It wasn't dynoed at f-body cantral it was at eld performance. If I knew it was gonna cause a big arguement I would have just not posted it. I'll make sure thaT I keep my nitrous numbers to myself.
05-07-2009, 07:19 PM
#28
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wyoming
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol @ this thread. Its funny how everyone likes to discredit the dyno numbers posted, but at the same time will argue till they are blue in the face about numbers being spit out on a tuning device, and im sure everyone on this board thinks their personal overly high numbers are correct tho. lol The dyno is for tuning. Numbers dont mean anything so who cares. With that being said, GREAT NUMBERS OP! It just gives an idea what the car is capable of. Take it to the track where it will shine!
05-07-2009, 07:42 PM
#30
You two call me whatever you want, find ONE 346 with an MS3 that makes 400rwtq at 3400 rpms. Hell find one 346 period that makes 400rwtq at 3400 rpms lol.
Just one is all I ask, simply amazing that I know for a fact that won't happen but you guys will commend this guy and act like it happens all the time. Do what you gotta do to sell those parts.
Just one is all I ask, simply amazing that I know for a fact that won't happen but you guys will commend this guy and act like it happens all the time. Do what you gotta do to sell those parts.
maxima.org
glad to see your car is looking good though
05-07-2009, 08:59 PM
#32
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sarasota & Lee County
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Props for making a read worthy post in this thread, seems to be about the only one. There are atleast a 1000 posted graphs of dyno numbers that are or seem high, nobody seemed to care al long as it wasn't a TSP product on that car. If the owner of the car is happy, congrats to him and thank him for posting. This site seems to be turning into somthing you would see on a honda site anymore.
05-07-2009, 09:48 PM
#33
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: glen rock pa
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
vote 1# for TSP they make some sick *** h/c packages!!!!! also this package is $1600 for h/c kit that makes good power! i have seen this same package more then once make at least 440 on "MUSTANG DYNO" with 9 inch!!! the torque numbers are off but the hp should be around that!!!
You sure thats not just a mistype, or its a 383 or somthing? 
05-08-2009, 07:50 AM
#37
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-08-2009, 08:27 AM
#39
FYI I was not bragging. I was stating that those numbers are very good considering my numbers were not near that and even had a fast intake on. If he is happy with his car then fine. That's all i'm saying so get over yourself.
You are clearly a nutswinger
05-08-2009, 09:05 AM
#40
There is always someone that calls the BS flag no matter what you post.
Hey guys, I have a MS3 on a 114 that is going to crack 500whp. Think that isn't possible, then I will put money on it along with making an unreal amount of torque. But let me guess that isn't feasable because I am not showing you a picture of the 408 that it's going into. The MS3 and MS4 are proven cams that can get results. The guy got his figures and bashing the hell out of him and now going at it with sponsors. Ballsy to straight call someone out, you might as well just say lier. Just my observation..
By the way, great #'s and get that thing to the track. I too think the torque is a bit high but that is what you got. Careful with the rear but get some good #'s
Hey guys, I have a MS3 on a 114 that is going to crack 500whp. Think that isn't possible, then I will put money on it along with making an unreal amount of torque. But let me guess that isn't feasable because I am not showing you a picture of the 408 that it's going into. The MS3 and MS4 are proven cams that can get results. The guy got his figures and bashing the hell out of him and now going at it with sponsors. Ballsy to straight call someone out, you might as well just say lier. Just my observation..
By the way, great #'s and get that thing to the track. I too think the torque is a bit high but that is what you got. Careful with the rear but get some good #'s