5.3 heads and ms3 cam #s
05-09-2009, 04:28 PM
#61
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i guess we must use the terminology different here. The only time "how it feels" is most important to me is taking a **** and getting a blow job. Combine the two and you got it made.
I could say my car "feels" fast all day long but thats not proving anything.
I could say my car "feels" fast all day long but thats not proving anything.
12-30-2009, 04:05 PM
#64
Marc what was the difference you saw from their and on my Mustang out of curiosity? I had a guy say his heads and cam car made 46x on some dyno around here a while back, and I put a few bus lengths on him with my 42x hp cam only car. Didnt add up to me, but i didnt feel like raining on the guys parade. He "knew" I was spraying - I left it at that
If you want to normalize all the widely different dyno numbers, there are very few cars in reality that will make over 400-410 ft lbs of torque. If it makes 460/425 tq on some funky equipment, 99% 346 cars will make 435/400 on a "normal" dynojet SAE corrected, no weather station tricks
If you want to normalize all the widely different dyno numbers, there are very few cars in reality that will make over 400-410 ft lbs of torque. If it makes 460/425 tq on some funky equipment, 99% 346 cars will make 435/400 on a "normal" dynojet SAE corrected, no weather station tricks
Last edited by GrannySShifting; 12-31-2009 at 11:15 AM.
12-30-2009, 06:54 PM
#65
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SO why hasn't he posted track times yet?????????? Maybe because that TSP set up will NOT make that power. Sucks that there are shops out there that will lie to customers like this!
12-30-2009, 08:25 PM
#66
Teching In
Join Date: May 2009
Location: indiana
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe the numbers are pretty high,But I have to commend tsp for making a very affordable head and cam package that is capable of very good dyno numbers. Especially when you consider the money invested. For the record,I have never purchased 1 thing from tsp. They have many good dyno post's in this section. We are all here to learn more,Why does everyone have to jump on the hate wagon.
12-31-2009, 04:37 PM
#67
Marc what was the difference you saw from their and on my Mustang out of curiosity? I had a guy say his heads and cam car made 46x on some dyno around here a while back, and I put a few bus lengths on him with my 42x hp cam only car. Didnt add up to me, but i didnt feel like raining on the guys parade. He "knew" I was spraying - I left it at that
I also told them to stop the run a 7000, but they banged the 7200rpm limiter for at least a second or two
Only reason I went there is because his new shop was almost across the street from my old house, and I was trying to diag a trans issue. They told me their tune would solve it, and make more power. I said no thanks. Ended up being a bad MAF.
01-01-2010, 11:01 AM
#68
They wanted to do the run locked, because "that's what most of the Mustang guys do". I told them unlocked only, because that's how it's driven and the converter isn't made for WOT lockup. It did low 460s SAE unlocked... through the exhaust, and with my 18" MT drag radials.
I also told them to stop the run a 7000, but they banged the 7200rpm limiter for at least a second or two
Only reason I went there is because his new shop was almost across the street from my old house, and I was trying to diag a trans issue. They told me their tune would solve it, and make more power. I said no thanks. Ended up being a bad MAF.
I also told them to stop the run a 7000, but they banged the 7200rpm limiter for at least a second or two
Only reason I went there is because his new shop was almost across the street from my old house, and I was trying to diag a trans issue. They told me their tune would solve it, and make more power. I said no thanks. Ended up being a bad MAF.
Some people just dont have a clue
01-05-2010, 11:04 AM
#69
Shift points, timing, and firmness were all way off, intermittently. TCC wasn't working right either. Oh, and I sent some work your way - Roger, an SBC guy that's learning his new LS1. I told him to see you rather than waste his money on a handheld tuner.
Just need to fix it 
01-09-2010, 06:00 PM
#72
Nice numbers coyboyup for sure!! my tq # are low but i dont care,its a track car only car.I leave the line at 4800 and im in 3rd gear at 500 ft.I put down 43x on a Mustang Dyno UNLOCKED A4,my converter has NO lockup(saves 6lbs) rotating weight. 10.40 at 127 3150lbs.
