Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

'02 Camaro SS M6 458rwhp/421rwtq !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2009, 05:42 PM
  #41  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Marc 85Z28
Honestly I could care less about the tune, and so should you and Vengeance. Overlook that, and don't hide behind it. The power and torque peaks are not where they should be, and it should carry better. Something isn't right, and it's not the tune. Explain that.
Marc, maybe you should go back and read my previous post. Already explained it. One more time. I am speculating that less timing approx 8* and 3-5 tenths less compression would/should explain the 30+ rwhp that is missing from a lot of the Vengeance installed tfs/vindicator combos.

Maybe the OP can shed some light on the tune. How much timing are you commanding ? We already cleared up that your compression is 11.1 to 1 vs 11.5 to 1 or higher like many of the 500 rwhp cars. How much timing and are you experiencing any knock and if so where?
Old 07-12-2009, 06:18 PM
  #42  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Kurtomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if you command 20 degrees of timing vs 28...power might be affected but not where it occurs
Old 07-12-2009, 06:27 PM
  #43  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Kurtomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ron, your Vindicator and TFS 500rwhp cars were 59cc heads IIRC...please confirm...I have 61cc heads and .054 MLS gaskets...on my custom cam sheet PatG calculated Static CR at 11.07:1....TEA said the same...11:1...how can the addition ~.012 of mill not increase the CR ANY?
Please post the dyno sheet of the C5Z that you guys did that was 500rwhp plus with the Vindicator...i checked your site you used to have a list of mods under that car (red z06 i believe) anyways it was run to 7000+ and held power good...Doug if you think Marc and I are bashing VR were not...were trying to point out something to the OP with his build (power peak not where it should be) was the cam degreed or doctored? a 240 244 cam 112ICL no way should peak at 6200...shoot its smaller VR brother grind from VR the VRX5 peaked at 6500 in my car
Old 07-12-2009, 07:42 PM
  #44  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I agree on the cam peaking early. The OP himself said he was going to check and see if the cam was installed straight up.

Now help me, if you retard the cam it peaks earlier and gains lowend tq, if you advance the cam you should peak later and gain peak hp. Just want to make sure I am not operating under false pretenses here.
Old 07-12-2009, 07:54 PM
  #45  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
Marc, maybe you should go back and read my previous post. Already explained it. One more time. I am speculating that less timing approx 8* and 3-5 tenths less compression would/should explain the 30+ rwhp that is missing from a lot of the Vengeance installed tfs/vindicator combos.
That's fine. I'm not arguing that. I'm saying the power isn't up to par and the power and torque peaks hint at an underlying problem.

Whether or not this combo should make 500rwhp or ever really has is something else entirely.
Old 07-12-2009, 08:27 PM
  #46  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

BAD95 Great write up I love that pic and yes Ron and Mike @VengeanceRacing are awesome.

Congrats to Devil SS and great work from Hesham Like always.
Old 07-12-2009, 08:28 PM
  #47  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Oh when are we going to see 500rwhp+ from your DevilOsix????
Old 07-12-2009, 08:51 PM
  #48  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
tillery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Its a good thing dynos dont win races-get that beeast to the track and tell the rest of the story. Street fuel is formulated for that-leaded fuel would be great-xcept for your O2s. Isnt the fuel in the mid-east still leaded? its hot and humid this time of year. the air is heavy and hard to breath. Go out and shut down punks running N2O-lol. its great to turn low numbers N/A.
Old 07-12-2009, 09:03 PM
  #49  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
Ironxcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

all that power and still running the glass rear?
Old 07-12-2009, 09:09 PM
  #50  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Marc 85Z28
That's fine. I'm not arguing that. I'm saying the power isn't up to par and the power and torque peaks hint at an underlying problem.

Whether or not this combo should make 500rwhp or ever really has is something else entirely.
Looks like we have been saying the same thing man. I too was concerned why the power was lower then other cars with the exact same pkg. I was really trying to figure out the reason(s) myself, not defend Vengeance. The reputation Vengeance has built for themselves needs no defending. There results speak for them loud and clear. Perfect example, my car. I will go as far to speculate that if my short had been a PROLINE short and the compression had been where I originally wanted it at 11.8 to 1 I could've seen 560 rwhp 520 rwtq. Oh well that's just me being greedy.
Old 07-13-2009, 12:17 AM
  #51  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Nitroused383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Did anyone degree that cam in? Sorry if I skipped or misread. Looks to have a lot of potentional as it had nice baseline.
Old 07-13-2009, 12:18 AM
  #52  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

It peaks early because the pushrod length is not right. I'd also be willing to bet money if you posted a graph that didn't stop at 6300rpm, that line would fall like a rock after 6500. Typical trait of TF heads unless the valvetrain is set up EXACTLY right. There's no way in hell a 240 duration cam is peaking that early.

A readjustment of the valvetrain will probably yeild a higher # and put the power band in the position it's suppose to be in.

EDIT - Wow. Didn't notice the alum. flywheel and 10 bolt. Those #'s are extremely low. Readjust that valvetrain.

Last edited by Damian; 07-13-2009 at 09:34 AM.
Old 07-13-2009, 06:24 AM
  #53  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Damian
It peaks early because the pushrod length is not right. I'd also be willing to bet money if you posted a graph that didn't stop at 6300rpm, that line would fall like a rock after 6500. Typical trait of TF heads unless the valvetrain is set up EXACTLY right. There's no way in hell a 240 duration cam is peaking that early.

A readjustment of the valvetrain will probably yeild a higher # and put the power band in the position it's suppose to be in.
Good post Damian. We'll find out if you are right or not soon enough I suspect.

I am sure whatever it is, Mike or Ron can walk the OP through the appropriate steps to correct the valvetrain setup if in fact it is the valvetrain being setup incorrectly.
Old 07-13-2009, 08:42 AM
  #54  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
SmokedOutZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NW Chicago burbs
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bad95killer
Typically its all started with a few bolt-ons Dyno'd 'n hits 343rwhp/351rwtq @ 13.1 AFR (Feels damn sluggish) a joke Mods List :

2002 Camaro SS M6 with a fresh stock LS1 motor 30k on odo
K&N FIPK
SLP 85mm Z06
Pacesetter LTs
ORY
Borla Adj. CB
SLP U/D pulley
Walbro 255L Fuel Pump

After going back and forth with my buddy & keep saying to him "Nah , Its not fast enuff" eventually i managed to convince him to take her to the next level.
Too many shops with non-scratched reputation but i thought to went with someone being well known & highly respected around here > Ron@Vengeance Just simply give the guy a shot & you could respectfully step a side to let him do the rest

I call it 346ci No joke Package

Trickflow CNC 215cc Heads Milled to 59cc
TrickFlow 7.500 Hardened Pushrods
Vindicator Camshaft (240/244 .608/.596 112+0)
Yella Terra 1.7 Ultra lite RR
ARP Heads Bolt
GM MLS Head Gaskets
FAST 92mm Intake Manifold Ported by Vengeance
Nick Williams 92mm Billet Throttlebody
Melling Hi Volume Oil Pump
LS2 Timing Chain
FORD Motorsport 42lb/hr Fuel Injectors
NGK TR55 Plugs
Not to mentioned all gaskets & T-Shirt which coming along the above Nice 'n Neat Ron
Spec Stg 3 Clutch & Fidanza Aluminum Flywheel(Thanks to Fraser@Speedinc)
Tick Performance Adjustable Clutch Master Cylinder (Thanks To Joey@TickPerfomance)
Stock Rear with 3.42

All being said things delivered on the time but customs took me forever to released the package from the airport (Ron knows damn well what i'm talking about, Don't ya) anyway three weeks later things tightened up @ Hisham's shop (Nicely done buddy) & here's the best part of it > The First Start :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYZZC5yUnv4&fmt=18

The tuner tweaking a lil bit adjusting the idle @ 950rpm and gave her an extra dose of fuel so we can put a few miles on the new clutch.
A week later it was the moment of the truth (Dyno Tune) we were so excited except the owner he was too nervous LOL

A couple of runs to hit the bulls-eye with awesome driveability (Dyno Sheet) Got Torque ?! Hell yah :


PS all Runs were through wide open Borla CB so stay tuned for Idle/Dyno run/Driveability/WOT pass after E-Cutouts & SD tune been done.

A nice pic that i made for the 346ci No joke package :


At last i would like to thanks Ron@Vengeance & Mike@Vengeance & Hisham(Tech/Tuner) for their outstanding customer service...i know i'm not the first nor the last one to say this but ya guys ROCK

peace
How do you like that aluminum flywheel on that setup?
Old 07-13-2009, 11:26 AM
  #55  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (15)
 
7camaro7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bad95killer
Its not about 500rwhp its about torque & Track ET buddy


Next mods :
1- UMI Chrome Moly Shock Tower Brace
2- UMI K-Member
3- UMI Complete Front A-Arm Kit (Adjustable Upper)
4- UMI Tubular Single Adjustable Panhard Bar
5- UMI Adjustable Torque Arm
6- UMI Tubular Subframe Connectors - Bolt-In
7- UMI Sway Bars Kit
8- Best Free Mod Nasty Weight Reduction
9- E-Cutouts
10 - SD tune

Enuff said

peace
That's my kind of car straights and curves
Old 07-13-2009, 11:48 AM
  #56  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (75)
 
CaMaRo67RS355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rock Hill, South Carolina
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

with those mods i would have expected more hp and trq based on previous dyno sheets i have seen floating around here it looks a little off IMO
Old 07-13-2009, 12:15 PM
  #57  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
bad95killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere I Belong
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by venom ws7
BAD95 Great write up I love that pic and yes Ron and Mike @VengeanceRacing are awesome.

Congrats to Devil SS and great work from Hesham Like always.
Hey thanks Hussam 'n yes they are Btw he just got a new baby so working on peaks power will be scheduled later

Originally Posted by venom ws7
Oh when are we going to see 500rwhp+ from your DevilOsix????
Not yet buddy but 500rwhp hmm maybe x 2

Originally Posted by tillery
Its a good thing dynos dont win races-get that beeast to the track and tell the rest of the story. Street fuel is formulated for that-leaded fuel would be great-xcept for your O2s. Isnt the fuel in the mid-east still leaded? its hot and humid this time of year. the air is heavy and hard to breath. Go out and shut down punks running N2O-lol. its great to turn low numbers N/A.
Its all good man but the car should go under knife for a while & FYI its over 125* down here & i'm damn serious

Originally Posted by Ironxcross
all that power and still running the glass rear?
Yup its still through the Fragile rear

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
Looks like we have been saying the same thing man. I too was concerned why the power was lower then other cars with the exact same pkg. I was really trying to figure out the reason(s) myself, not defend Vengeance. The reputation Vengeance has built for themselves needs no defending. There results speak for them loud and clear. Perfect example, my car. I will go as far to speculate that if my short had been a PROLINE short and the compression had been where I originally wanted it at 11.8 to 1 I could've seen 560 rwhp 520 rwtq. Oh well that's just me being greedy.
Power wise = Never satisfied

I'll keep ya posted Doug

Originally Posted by Nitroused383
Did anyone degree that cam in? Sorry if I skipped or misread. Looks to have a lot of potentional as it had nice baseline.
I'm quite sure its buddy but things should be verified once and forever

Originally Posted by Damian
It peaks early because the pushrod length is not right. I'd also be willing to bet money if you posted a graph that didn't stop at 6300rpm, that line would fall like a rock after 6500. Typical trait of TF heads unless the valvetrain is set up EXACTLY right. There's no way in hell a 240 duration cam is peaking that early.

A readjustment of the valvetrain will probably yeild a higher # and put the power band in the position it's suppose to be in.

EDIT - Wow. Didn't notice the alum. flywheel and 10 bolt. Those #'s are extremely low. Readjust that valvetrain.
Thanks for your input Damian...Me & the Technician were surprised on early peaks check'd EFI live each & everything was smooth i said we have seen milder setup peaking @ 6500rpm saying the least we stood there then we agreed its the valvetrain so i decided to stripped the car off and roll on till weather gets better down here Btw Doug Merc 'n Kurt ya were asking alot about the timing > 25* sorry for delay guys

Originally Posted by SmokedOutZ28
How do you like that aluminum flywheel on that setup?
Feels damn good buddy but we starting to have slight issue with tranny

Originally Posted by 7camaro7
That's my kind of car straights and curves
Hell yah buddy all seasons warrior

peace
Old 07-13-2009, 12:53 PM
  #58  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
sscamaroburn02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,053
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

very good solid numbers-should run like a champ if the rear holds
Old 05-13-2010, 08:04 PM
  #59  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
djfury05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

back from the dead.. considering the package.. whats the word? has the valvetrain issue been corrected yet?
Old 05-14-2010, 10:56 AM
  #60  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Cold Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saudi Arabia, Qatif
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

As what I heared ; that beast currently has 475+ rwhp !

B95K has more details



Quick Reply: '02 Camaro SS M6 458rwhp/421rwtq !!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.