Does this look about right for my mods?
08-04-2009, 10:10 AM
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: KC.
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does this look about right for my mods? Well I have a 06' gto. mods are:
torquer v2 cam. "232-234 112lsa".
dual coil springs/hardened pushrods.
vararam cai.
ported intake. "by me".
ported t.b. by professional.
PS LT's. no cats,magnaflow catback.
Speedensity tune. by a good tuner here in KC.
stock clutch, w/83,000mi. and about 50 track passes. but she's getting week.
and I will be putting in a monster level 4 in a few weeks to fix this issue.
Just wanting to see if this looks about right for the mods I have on my car.
car ran a best 12.0 at 114mph. before tune,cai and ported intake/t.b.
then went back and only pulled a 12.2 at 114 dropping to 112mph. by the end of the night... "slipping clutch".
does the graph look okay?
before tune/cai/ported intake/t.b.
and after tune/cai/ported intake/t.b.
Hopefully the new clutch will get me into the 11's...
torquer v2 cam. "232-234 112lsa".
dual coil springs/hardened pushrods.
vararam cai.
ported intake. "by me".
ported t.b. by professional.
PS LT's. no cats,magnaflow catback.
Speedensity tune. by a good tuner here in KC.
stock clutch, w/83,000mi. and about 50 track passes. but she's getting week.
and I will be putting in a monster level 4 in a few weeks to fix this issue.
Just wanting to see if this looks about right for the mods I have on my car.
car ran a best 12.0 at 114mph. before tune,cai and ported intake/t.b.
then went back and only pulled a 12.2 at 114 dropping to 112mph. by the end of the night... "slipping clutch".
does the graph look okay?
before tune/cai/ported intake/t.b.
and after tune/cai/ported intake/t.b.
Hopefully the new clutch will get me into the 11's...
08-04-2009, 10:14 AM
#2
Strong running combo.
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
08-04-2009, 12:14 PM
#3
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clifton NJ
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks pretty good. Nice torque curve, this gives me a pretty good idea what I'll gain with my car. Get a clutch in that and run 11's with it. What's the raceweight?
Trending Topics
08-04-2009, 10:51 PM
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: KC.
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pass.seat or rear seat. When I had racelights big and littles. She was down to 3420 empty.
Now about 3500 empty on stocker wheels.
08-07-2009, 07:33 AM
#13
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Slowhawk question- why do you say that running this particular setup at around 12.0:1 is good for it? (no pun intended, I really am asking because I dont know lol).
I would think that running it at high 12s/ low 13s would yield the most power out of a/f tuning alone (of course there are variables like ignition timing and load to be taken into concideration). Idk, the a/f seems a bit concervative TO ME.
OP- Regardless, awesome numbers and a very well shaped curve! Do you happen to have the SAE corrected #s for these runs?
I would think that running it at high 12s/ low 13s would yield the most power out of a/f tuning alone (of course there are variables like ignition timing and load to be taken into concideration). Idk, the a/f seems a bit concervative TO ME.
OP- Regardless, awesome numbers and a very well shaped curve! Do you happen to have the SAE corrected #s for these runs?
08-07-2009, 08:04 AM
#14
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: KC.
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Slowhawk question- why do you say that running this particular setup at around 12.0:1 is good for it? (no pun intended, I really am asking because I dont know lol).
I would think that running it at high 12s/ low 13s would yield the most power out of a/f tuning alone (of course there are variables like ignition timing and load to be taken into concideration). Idk, the a/f seems a bit concervative TO ME.
OP- Regardless, awesome numbers and a very well shaped curve! Do you happen to have the SAE corrected #s for these runs?
I would think that running it at high 12s/ low 13s would yield the most power out of a/f tuning alone (of course there are variables like ignition timing and load to be taken into concideration). Idk, the a/f seems a bit concervative TO ME.
OP- Regardless, awesome numbers and a very well shaped curve! Do you happen to have the SAE corrected #s for these runs?
No I sure don't have the SAE corrected numbers.
08-07-2009, 11:54 AM
#15
Hey Slowhawk question- why do you say that running this particular setup at around 12.0:1 is good for it? (no pun intended, I really am asking because I dont know lol).
I would think that running it at high 12s/ low 13s would yield the most power out of a/f tuning alone (of course there are variables like ignition timing and load to be taken into concideration). Idk, the a/f seems a bit concervative TO ME.
OP- Regardless, awesome numbers and a very well shaped curve! Do you happen to have the SAE corrected #s for these runs?
I would think that running it at high 12s/ low 13s would yield the most power out of a/f tuning alone (of course there are variables like ignition timing and load to be taken into concideration). Idk, the a/f seems a bit concervative TO ME.
OP- Regardless, awesome numbers and a very well shaped curve! Do you happen to have the SAE corrected #s for these runs?
08-12-2009, 09:15 AM
#18
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't say anything on this post but I've always run GTO's and trucks at 12 to 12.5-1 A/F's.This is from extensive track testing.They run faster.Also with the correct timing ect most of the time there is no HP gain on the dyno going from 12-1 to 12.8-1. 13-1 is not optimal on all cars.
