DYNO RESULTS - Patriot LS6 style heads + G5X-3 cam...
#81
Originally Posted by 1ScrudeDude
2000 Camaro SS,SLP (Ebony/Red MN6)Build #3516
JPR Stage II heads
224 Thunder Cam
JPR Ported MAF
JPR Ported Throttlebody
ASP Crank Pulley
LS6 Intake Manifold
Mac Headers W/ORP
Mcleod REV-LOC II Clutch
430RWHP 419RWTQ
Dayum shadow, those are huge numbers for that set up. Are those #s SAE corrected? We got a similar set up except my MAF and TB are stock. You got a stock rear? Gears? Not to bash, great numbers, but surely very high.
Back to the topic, we need to see a dyno graph!
JPR Stage II heads
224 Thunder Cam
JPR Ported MAF
JPR Ported Throttlebody
ASP Crank Pulley
LS6 Intake Manifold
Mac Headers W/ORP
Mcleod REV-LOC II Clutch
430RWHP 419RWTQ
Dayum shadow, those are huge numbers for that set up. Are those #s SAE corrected? We got a similar set up except my MAF and TB are stock. You got a stock rear? Gears? Not to bash, great numbers, but surely very high.
Back to the topic, we need to see a dyno graph!
Yes SAE corrected .. Good heads what can I say? 10.8 compression I'll get the graph for ya all, no dyno tricks no short belts .. "Street car" 3.42 gears 10 bolt rear, JPR Ported TB, JPR Ported MAF housing
#82
11 Second Club
Originally Posted by shadowSS
Yes SAE corrected .. Good heads what can I say? 10.8 compression I'll get the graph for ya all, no dyno tricks no short belts .. "Street car" 3.42 gears 10 bolt rear, JPR Ported TB, JPR Ported MAF housing
OBSSD, these are the numbers you should be dialed in for. (Waiting for some updates...)
#83
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Bandit here again. Just FYI, My tranny took a Dump 2 hours after I drove it with all the new mods (Cam, PP Heads, and LT headers)
My car only had 11K on the odometer. Oh well, you play you pay ,
No Dyno #'s from me until the tranny is fixed
Good Luck.
Gary
My car only had 11K on the odometer. Oh well, you play you pay ,
No Dyno #'s from me until the tranny is fixed
Good Luck.
Gary
#87
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TApimp
i see some big headedness coming from obssesd. kinda reminds me of back in the day.....
i agree with spanky on the tuning
i agree with spanky on the tuning
TAPimp "THE" tuner
LOL..
Wade should be posting the dyno graph soon guys - I'm not sure what the problem is
Chris
#88
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
Originally Posted by OBSSSD
TAPimp "THE" tuner
I'm not sure what the problem is
Chris
Like I said, post the results either way.
#89
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SPANKY LS1
Does your dad know that his "Master Tuner" son tuned his H/C car to the level of a well tuned cam only car. As I said earlier, the "THE TUNER" proclamation is ironic considering your car is down ~50hp from where it should be. I would take off my blinders if I were you, and look everywhere.
Like I said, post the results either way.
Like I said, post the results either way.
LOL Guess you don't want to bet against my tuning anymore?
I mean - are you chickening out Spanky? You made a bet for $600 and now you want to change it to a nickel? Surely LG can get more power out by a retune
#90
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
Originally Posted by OBSSSD
What does the rwhp the car is running have to do with the tune - if in fact the tuning is optomized?
LOL Guess you don't want to bet against my tuning anymore?
I mean - are you chickening out Spanky? You made a bet for $600 and now you want to change it to a nickel? Surely LG can get more power out by a retune
LOL Guess you don't want to bet against my tuning anymore?
I mean - are you chickening out Spanky? You made a bet for $600 and now you want to change it to a nickel? Surely LG can get more power out by a retune
Your PM has been returned, BTW.
Last edited by SPANKY LS1; 11-28-2003 at 07:12 PM.
#92
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PewterY2KZ28
FWIW, Chris tuned my car to "perfection"!!
what a difference!
I would definately call him the Master"! Tuner......!
BTW, Chris, how does the Hawk stand up to your dad's SS??
what a difference!
I would definately call him the Master"! Tuner......!
BTW, Chris, how does the Hawk stand up to your dad's SS??
I bet it needed alot of tuning with those heads and that monster cam you are running. Sorry, I couldn't resist.
#93
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OBSSSD
We all saw what happened when it was time to lay a cash bet down. As for you, if you think I can't tune then why not put your $$$ where your mouth is? I could use some extra spending $$$ for Christmas
TAPimp "THE" tuner
LOL..
Wade should be posting the dyno graph soon guys - I'm not sure what the problem is
Chris
TAPimp "THE" tuner
LOL..
Wade should be posting the dyno graph soon guys - I'm not sure what the problem is
Chris
think u could fit your big head into your one of your(or dads) 7 ls1 cars for a race? betting on tuning is gay. wanna race?
TAPimp bows to no
#95
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
Originally Posted by gomer
I bet it needed alot of tuning with those heads and that monster cam you are running. Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Originally Posted by turbotruck
I think obsessed was just looking for a hand, does anyone try to help?
OBSSED wasn't looking for a hand. What could us mere mortals tell him that he doesn't already know? Maybe his ego filled the dyno room and threw off the correction factors or something...
Anyways, my original suggestion (trying to be helpful) was that I *thought* that it was in the tuning. My car was "perfectly tuned" by a shop (to the tune of $450). Then I had the tuning redone, and the "perfect tune" was improved by ~15 hp/15 tq. My point was, never assume that the tuning is perfect when the results are so far below where they should be. If I were him, and my car was down ~50hp from where it should be, I'd be looking at everything trying to find the lost power. But, the MASTER TUNER won't hear of it, I mean, it can't be, he is the greatest tuner of all time.
He is to LS1 tuning what Al Gore is to the intenet.
#97
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (63)
Originally Posted by gomer
I bet it needed alot of tuning with those heads and that monster cam you are running. Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Not taking sides here, merely stating a fact of what the guy did for MY car.!
Losen up!
Got to start somewhere. Guess you bought your car from the factory like that.?
#99
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ATX©
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He really knows his LS1 edit. The problem is not the tuning, but I can see where some would think that.
The problem has to be some sort of mechanical issue. Maybe the P/V clearance is a problem. Honestly, I would like to see the car dyno at LG to see if there is a difference.
I will post up the dyno on monday...
-Wade
The problem has to be some sort of mechanical issue. Maybe the P/V clearance is a problem. Honestly, I would like to see the car dyno at LG to see if there is a difference.
I will post up the dyno on monday...
-Wade
#100
Staging Lane
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ft Worth Tx
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cracker
He really knows his LS1 edit. The problem is not the tuning, but I can see where some would think that.
The problem has to be some sort of mechanical issue. Maybe the P/V clearance is a problem. Honestly, I would like to see the car dyno at LG to see if there is a difference.
I will post up the dyno on monday...
-Wade
The problem has to be some sort of mechanical issue. Maybe the P/V clearance is a problem. Honestly, I would like to see the car dyno at LG to see if there is a difference.
I will post up the dyno on monday...
-Wade
Jump on it wade!