Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

2010 SS 7psi procharger/689hp&640tq

Old 09-30-2009, 07:54 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
lt1dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Milford oh
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 2010 SS 7psi procharger/689hp&640tq

I just got done doing two 2010 camaros (father and son). one orange, one yellow. One made 689/640, the other 686/641. Mods were D1sc procharger, with front mount intercooler, 7psi(4.0 pulley), 224/230 cam, 2.0 kooks, GMPP mufflers, tuned w/hp. Rest of the car was stock.
Ill scan in the sheets later. These LS3s are nothing short of amazing. that kind of power from that low level boost!
Attached Thumbnails 2010 SS 7psi procharger/689hp&640tq-dscf1784.jpg   2010 SS 7psi procharger/689hp&640tq-dscf1785.jpg  

Last edited by lt1dave; 09-30-2009 at 12:29 PM. Reason: mis typed the hp number
Old 09-30-2009, 07:56 AM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

sick numbers on just 7 psi. lets see/hear some vids!
Old 09-30-2009, 08:08 AM
  #3  
Teching In
 
evolve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh my Jeebus!!! +1 on vids!
Old 09-30-2009, 08:11 AM
  #4  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Crazy numbers!

What mods did the other one get?
Old 09-30-2009, 08:17 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
lt1dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Milford oh
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ScreaminRedZ
Crazy numbers!

What mods did the other one get?
both were identical builds. forgot, I had a sno kit, and 65lb/hr injectors (they tag 100% up top at 12/1) on both as well
Old 09-30-2009, 08:31 AM
  #6  
SKI
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
SKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

sick...............
Old 09-30-2009, 08:49 AM
  #7  
TECH Regular
 
1.8t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If both were identical builds, how come there is a 100whp discrepancy? These numbers are almost unbelievable IMO.
Old 09-30-2009, 08:49 AM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
z28mccrory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Great numbers.

Maybe im missing it... but they are identical mods? If so... why the 100hp difference between cars?
Old 09-30-2009, 08:51 AM
  #9  
TWS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (63)
 
TWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by lt1dave
both were identical builds.
Why the 100 RWHP difference? I know that identical builds don't automatically equal identical results... but why a 100 RWHP delta?
Old 09-30-2009, 08:52 AM
  #10  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike@Diablosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,289
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

No fuel system mods besides the injectors?

We had one on the dyno the other day that was obviously out of fuel pump at 560 rwhp/5500 rpm....
Old 09-30-2009, 09:03 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
lt1dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Milford oh
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike@Diablosport
No fuel system mods besides the injectors?

We had one on the dyno the other day that was obviously out of fuel pump at 560 rwhp/5500 rpm....
MSD pump booster. (This sets an engine light BTW, because the original driver isnt seeing a load). Also the METH helps with the fueling demand.

Was your project dropping pressure? I wondered if we really needed the pump drivers at all on these cars. Im just used to installing them on the boosted c5/c6s, so I just did so on these as well.

FYI, the fuel pump in the tank of the 2010 camaro is really short, so an aftermarket in tank pump is going to be an issue with them.

Oh, and the typo is corrected above!
Old 09-30-2009, 09:05 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lt1dave
I just got done doing two 2010 camaros (father and son). one orange, one yellow. One made 789/640, the other 786/641. Mods were D1sc procharger, with front mount intercooler, 7psi(4.0 pulley), 224/230 cam, 2.0 kooks, GMPP mufflers, tuned w/hp. Rest of the car was stock.
Ill scan in the sheets later. These LS3s are nothing short of amazing. that kind of power from that low level boost!
I don't see the hp difference that some are asking about ??

Looks like the cars laid down pretty good hp/tq. Going to need it with all that weight though. On the fuel issues, will bigger injectors help, or will you need to upgrade the pump ?

Nice job on both cars. Am I reading it correct ? 2.0 Kooks as in 2" headers ? NICE !!!
Old 09-30-2009, 09:19 AM
  #13  
TWS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (63)
 
TWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
I don't see the hp difference that some are asking about ??
Last edited by lt1dave; Today at 08:55 AM.. Reason: mis typed the hp number

It was a typo after all. I think a number of us were until he corrected that.
Old 09-30-2009, 09:21 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Good looking out man !!!
Old 09-30-2009, 09:37 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
lt1dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Milford oh
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
I don't see the hp difference that some are asking about ??

Looks like the cars laid down pretty good hp/tq. Going to need it with all that weight though. On the fuel issues, will bigger injectors help, or will you need to upgrade the pump ?

Nice job on both cars. Am I reading it correct ? 2.0 Kooks as in 2" headers ? NICE !!!
Yeah, they owners were happy. And you sure cant tell there heavy cars NOW!LOL!

2.0 headers seem to be the norm for these cars. Thought about uncapping them to see what kind of numbers they could do. but without more fuel........

Fueling will be fine. It doesnt lean past 12.0/1, and only for about 500rpm.
Old 09-30-2009, 09:57 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
 
Blackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, Wa
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

200 more hp than a maggie makes at 7psi?
something doesn't seem right. few threads below a 2010 SS with 7psi, headers, makes 520. is the cam worth 200 hp?
Old 09-30-2009, 10:10 AM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
brians91formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbird
200 more hp than a maggie makes at 7psi?
something doesn't seem right. few threads below a 2010 SS with 7psi, headers, makes 520. is the cam worth 200 hp?
exactly what I was thinking.
Old 09-30-2009, 10:10 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
lt1dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Milford oh
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

procharger>maggie LOL

cam, meth, header size, blower/intercooler eff., etc.
Old 09-30-2009, 10:29 AM
  #19  
TECH Regular
 
1.8t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^ I don't see 200hp in those differences at the same boost level. This will undoubtedly be the highest dyno numbers for only 7lbs of boost for an LS3 with these mods. There have been a number of Vorteched LS3's over on corvette forum and the cam'ed ones on 7lbs are pushing mid/low 600's. These cars have another 100whp on top of them. I don't get it.
Old 09-30-2009, 10:58 AM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So what is the optimum A/F for this setup? 11.5 to 1 because of the FI ?

What are the options to make these setups more reliable if the injectors are done? Pump and injectors, or just injectors ? Either way great work.

As far as the weight, theres two ways to correct for a heavy car, remove weight or add power ! I see you chose the latter. LOL

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2010 SS 7psi procharger/689hp&640tq



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 AM.