Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

cam only F-body 443/405

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2009, 11:55 PM
  #21  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
BayAreaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SIC LSX
Hard to believe with that rear end setup and not having a ported FAST intake. Sounds like a happy dyno to me. You have electric water pump? I mean i only have 413whp ls6 intake and a lot smaller cam, but i have a stock 10 bolt. With that rear combo i would loose a good 15-20whp. So thats like saying if you with a ported FAST and stock 10bolt you would put down 460-470whp with stock heads/stock short block LOL I just dont see it sorry.
His car runs like it has 430hp so its legit.
Old 11-18-2009, 10:18 PM
  #22  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1sicws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BayAreaSS
His car runs like it has 430hp so its legit.
Right. our dyno actually not high number happy.. Dynojet
Old 12-01-2009, 11:24 AM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
 
02BLKWS6MD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Millersville, MD
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats probably the best numbers I've seen out of that cam in a long while. Goods results
Old 12-01-2009, 01:31 PM
  #24  
Banned
iTrader: (22)
 
LS1 SPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Schaumburg,IL
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

very good #'s for no FAST and the driveline

congrats
Old 12-01-2009, 11:14 PM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
418redz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: sw mo
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

another one for the trex!!!
Old 12-02-2009, 12:20 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Pwebbz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denton, Tx
Posts: 1,248
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by yonerhottlt1
That big of a cam with stock cubes?! You probably had to spin that thing to like 7 grand. Nice numbers tho
I shift my 232/234 cam at 7k.

Trex has been forgotten and masked over by all the hooplah and sales pitches for new stuff. Its a shame since its still one of the best cams out there.
Old 12-02-2009, 01:16 AM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
ssfast99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pwebbz28
I shift my 232/234 cam at 7k.

Trex has been forgotten and masked over by all the hooplah and sales pitches for new stuff. Its a shame since its still one of the best cams out there.
very good call on the t-rex being a great cam to this day. I would not change my t-rex even if someone gave me a new cam. the only thing better is a custom cam with a bigger motor. congrats to the OP on his numbers. track times would be nice and graph too.
Old 12-02-2009, 07:40 AM
  #28  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great numbers, that T-Rex cam is nasty! How's the driveability with it? I've been tossing around the idea of going bigger with my cam, but haven't decided yet. Drivebility definitely doesn't have to be DD good since my car doesn't get drive alot, but I don't want it to stall out at a stop sign either, haha.

Does anyone know how that cam does if you add a set of heads?
Old 12-04-2009, 04:58 PM
  #29  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

very nice i am impressed more with the 120mph being ls6 cam only ...this cam should scream...i want track numbers
Old 12-04-2009, 05:02 PM
  #30  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by squee
I'm guessing PTV clearance is good and no flycutting?
Yeah right. I bet it's tight as cluck!
Old 12-04-2009, 05:19 PM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JPH
Yeah right. I bet it's tight as cluck!
haha whats 50 thou anyways about 14 pieces of paper...
Old 12-04-2009, 05:37 PM
  #32  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Nitroused383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

My buddies 04 GTO M6 with trex, ported 241's, fast 90 and bolt ons put down 410rwhp. That cam might be ok in a race oriented f-body but it has no low end for a gto at all. I helped tune some of the driveability on his car and I was actually pretty impressed, besides the no low end torque. I did minimal tune work and it bucks less than my 224 cam...
Old 12-04-2009, 09:10 PM
  #33  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
BayAreaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
very nice i am impressed more with the 120mph being ls6 cam only ...this cam should scream...i want track numbers
I'm pretty sure he ran an 11.6 at 124 with traction issues out the hole. I think the 60ft was only a 1.9
Old 12-05-2009, 01:25 AM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
 
somws6bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice numbers.
Old 12-05-2009, 10:35 AM
  #35  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BayAreaSS
I'm pretty sure he ran an 11.6 at 124 with traction issues out the hole. I think the 60ft was only a 1.9
very nice mph then...
Old 12-05-2009, 08:31 PM
  #36  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
SILVERZZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South,Alabama
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice numbers
Old 12-06-2009, 06:58 AM
  #37  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1sicws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BayAreaSS
I'm pretty sure he ran an 11.6 at 124 with traction issues out the hole. I think the 60ft was only a 1.9
correct.. I added a fast and made 440/403 even though it didn't gain much it feels stronger with the fast then when I did the cam.. new track numbers to come..oh and the driveabilty is even better with the fast, with the 4:30s this thing drives better then most the cammed cars I have drivin. My tuner did a great job with it!
Old 12-06-2009, 11:19 AM
  #38  
Teching In
 
KB240LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can you post up the dyno? I like checking out the tq curve since thats what matters most.
Old 12-06-2009, 01:03 PM
  #39  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
MYSTIC-1SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

very nice numbers
Old 12-07-2009, 01:55 AM
  #40  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
BayAreaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1sicws6
correct.. I added a fast and made 440/403 even though it didn't gain much it feels stronger with the fast then when I did the cam.. new track numbers to come..oh and the driveabilty is even better with the fast, with the 4:30s this thing drives better then most the cammed cars I have drivin. My tuner did a great job with it!
I'm hoping to get that same special tune next time


Quick Reply: cam only F-body 443/405



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.