2011 GT dyno results...
And believe me when I say I've talked a long conversation with someone that's WAAYYYY up the ladder in GM about this issue, and I'm anxiously awaiting what he finds can be done, and when it will be, if ever.
Believe me, I'm an ls fan, have had the h/c setup on an ls1, had the 402 ls2 stroker, have an ls7 headed 6 litre setup now that should be well into the 750 hp at the crank level, before I start putting about 250 hp of nitrous to it... The ls motor's make great power, but when you put that in a 2 ton sled, it doesn't do you any good. Plus the IRS... that's a total fail.
That's a great comparison. Now lets see an auto 5.0 vs. a m6 ls3. Or since that would be worthless too. how about comparing both manual trans. versions of the cars. So that it isn't quite so obvious your staking the deck in favor of the 5.0. Except to people that don't know any better.
BTW there is no Ls3 auto. Thank god for HP tuners.
BTW there is no Ls3 auto. Thank god for HP tuners.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
no it doesnt change the fact that theres two different transmissions on that graph, but the fact that he stated its an auto and not a stick shows that he wasnt trying to hide that fact as well. be easy, your responses (and screen name at that) show that youre investing emotions in this and prefer to fight about it before even formulating better ideas in your head so that you can type up a proper response
Last edited by MauriSSio; Jun 24, 2010 at 06:02 PM.
Bottom line....stock to stock...the cars are well within the driver making the difference between winning and losing.
The auto's are a bit different, as from what I've seen, the 5.0 has a noticeable advantage in RWHP - I guess due to a more efficient trans.
Bottom line....stock to stock...the cars are well within the driver making the difference between winning and losing.
The auto's are a bit different, as from what I've seen, the 5.0 has a noticeable advantage in RWHP - I guess due to a more efficient trans.
the auto 5.0 has an advantage in drivetrain efficiency AND power output in general vs the L99.
no it doesnt change the fact that theres two different transmissions on that graph, but the fact that he stated its an auto and not a stick shows that he wasnt trying to hide that fact as well. be easy, your responses (and screen name at that) show that youre investing emotions in this and prefer to fight about it before even formulating better ideas in your head so that you can type up a proper response
Bob Cosby! WTF man? Who let you out of the insane asylum?

And FWIW, even Mike Moran is heading over to the Mustang camp.....he is building two new Mustangs for competition

This new 5.0 definately has my interest - the first Mustang I've seriously considered in a LONG time. I'll be ready to buy around the first of the year.....2011 GT....2008 C6 (LS3)....or C5 Z06. All about the same amount of $$$$$. Gonna be tough to decide....
BTW there is no Ls3 auto. Thank god for HP tuners.
I mean, really?
It was a simple comparison, not to try to stack anything in anyones favor.
I have been a long time LS loyalist, and own and drive an LS powered F-body, not sure where you were going with htis, but it seems you weren't either


He was?

no it doesnt change the fact that theres two different transmissions on that graph, but the fact that he stated its an auto and not a stick shows that he wasnt trying to hide that fact as well. be easy, your responses (and screen name at that) show that youre investing emotions in this and prefer to fight about it before even formulating better ideas in your head so that you can type up a proper response
Dont forget Tim Lynch has come over to the dark side after years of Stang bangin....
Last edited by blk/slvr02ss; Jun 25, 2010 at 05:47 PM.







