Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

415 LS3 623RWHP 587RWTQ Stock Heads!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2010, 10:13 PM
  #21  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
stoverz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buda, Texas
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Just watched the vid, very impressive. What kind of trans is in there and do you think it helped put that # down because of less parasitic loss?
Old 11-10-2010, 08:39 PM
  #22  
Launching!
iTrader: (21)
 
Jim'sZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tampa,Fla
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bought my iron 415 from them. Very fast and were helpful in many ways! Def recommend
Old 11-11-2010, 08:27 AM
  #23  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Schwanke Engines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Springfield, MN
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gnx7
That torque seems impossible with this compression and displacement.

I know my buddies 440ci setup with TFS 235's put down a lot less than that.... and it was with 11.5:1 compression.

I assume they are stepped headers fully optimized for this setup as well?

Gotta love methanol and the proper cam for the application!!!
Old 11-11-2010, 08:28 AM
  #24  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Schwanke Engines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Springfield, MN
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stoverz28
Wow, very impressive #'s.

So what is the secret with the truck intake? Do they just work that good? I couldn't believe it pulled to 7k and never fell off!
Yep, kinda funny that the "crappy" truck stuff works!!!!
Old 11-11-2010, 08:30 AM
  #25  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Schwanke Engines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Springfield, MN
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stoverz28
Just watched the vid, very impressive. What kind of trans is in there and do you think it helped put that # down because of less parasitic loss?
Yes, it def. helps, but it is still going through a quick change rear end, which don't have the greatest drag numbers.

It is a Jericho trans.
Old 11-12-2010, 04:45 AM
  #26  
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This is one of the thread that makes my head goes nuts

the power level is extremly high with stock LS3 head/manifold Truck with 415ci

What will be happen if you have a 427 or 434 ci toped with a proper supporting manifold and the CNC LS3

Last edited by LS6; 11-12-2010 at 05:10 AM.
Old 11-12-2010, 06:01 AM
  #27  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I want to see what it will do with 93, i am guessing it will be somewhere in the 520rwhp range. I just cannot see 93 making 10-20hp less than the 110 did.
Old 11-12-2010, 10:15 AM
  #28  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Schwanke Engines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Springfield, MN
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gordon0652
I want to see what it will do with 93, i am guessing it will be somewhere in the 520rwhp range. I just cannot see 93 making 10-20hp less than the 110 did.
I really don't see 93 knocking it down that far, but I guess the world will never know, unless you get one and try it!!!
Old 11-12-2010, 10:44 AM
  #29  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Show a graph with SAE correction?
Old 11-12-2010, 11:39 AM
  #30  
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Schwanke Engines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Springfield, MN
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gordon0652
Show a graph with SAE correction?
SAE corrected it still made 580 on race gas, it is the second graph on my original post.
Old 11-12-2010, 12:31 PM
  #31  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

580rwhp is good. I didn't realize the original numbers were non SAE. Now I don't feel too bad making 521rwhp SAE through a 4L80E with 12 bolt/4.56 gears on 91 octane.
Old 05-27-2011, 02:33 AM
  #32  
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Every time I read this one, I feel proud of LS3 engine and the capabilities
Old 05-27-2011, 07:48 PM
  #33  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

^^^^definately drunk^^^^

Bringing it back from the Internet abyss lol
Old 05-27-2011, 09:31 PM
  #34  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If the correct numbers are 580hp that seems more like it. Remember nick williams did 570hp on pump gas with that stout 402ci..
The numbers here were so high i thought it was on an engine dyno and not in a car.



Quick Reply: 415 LS3 623RWHP 587RWTQ Stock Heads!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.