Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

LQ9 404ci L92 heads/LS3 intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2010, 07:58 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
PwrdbyLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default LQ9 404ci L92 heads/LS3 intake

Hi, tomorrow I'm going to dyno tune my new engine, its a TSP LQ9 404ci. Here's my setup:
- Eagle crank and rods
- Diamond racing pistons -10cc
- Ported L92 heads 345cfm @ .600, 352 @ .650, 64cc chamber
- Ported LS3 intake by JeremyF of Faster proms with 92mm Fast TB
- Patrick G custom cam 227/235 .639 .621 114LSA+2 LSK/LSL lobes
- SLP LID
- 85mm MAF
- Powerbond underdrive pulley
- ARH 1 3/4 headers with catted Y pipe
- 3in single cut out after the Y, Magnaflow catback.
Through a 9 in moser rear end w/ 4.11s, 3in steel driveshaft, Textralia OZ700 z grip. Stock SS/ZR1 wheels.

Compression is around 10.7:1, running on 91 octane gas. So I will not run a lot of timing.

My last 6.0L had the same parts, compression was 10:1 and I made 463 rwhp on a Dynocom dyno. 430rwhp on a Mustang Dyno. I just upgrade to 404ci short block. Tomorrow I put it on the Mustang dyno. I hope for 470rwhp, so near 500rwhp on dynojet dyno type. I know my exhaust is a little bit restrictive and slp lid, 85mm maf may hold it up a bit, but we'll see!

What do you think?
Old 11-11-2010, 08:39 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Jenson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I like the came choice. Subscribed for results
Old 11-11-2010, 08:48 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

dito !
Old 11-12-2010, 01:27 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,965
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

485rwhp 450rwtq !!!
Old 11-12-2010, 01:44 AM
  #5  
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (160)
 
smok'nZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OKLAHOMA
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

im gonna guess 469hp
Old 11-12-2010, 07:19 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good luck. You are going to be impressed with the driveabilty of these heads. We put down 508 with a 85mm maf, 90 mm TB, unported l76, 4.11's,and 1/34 x 17/8 headers. The maf didn't hurt flow on our build.
Old 11-12-2010, 03:17 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Nothing?
Old 11-12-2010, 05:14 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
PwrdbyLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have the results, I very surprise of the powerband. It didn't react how I would think with the 404ci stroker. All runs with a Mustang dynometer.

Close cutout: 422whp & 425 wtq SAE
Open cutout: 430whp & 433 wtq SAE

My old 6L dyno is 431whp & 388 wtq SAE open cut out...

So.. seems like the powerband move to lower rpm and I have the same whp as my old 6.0L but a lot more torque!

The car seems a lot more powerful, its the torque feeling. If I want more HP I will need a bigger cam !!

Timing at peak hp was 22.5°. Its a LS3 2010 camaro timing table, we cannot add more timing because it was knocking. Crappy Canada 91oct fuel

AFR was 12.6 open cutout.

First graph is open cutout vs close


Comparison graph 6.6L versus my old 6.0L


Video of the dyno run
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlj8bvPozYw

Last edited by PwrdbyLS1; 11-12-2010 at 07:17 PM. Reason: Add video
Old 11-12-2010, 10:16 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
ExceSSive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gateway International Raceway
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That is what I would have expected with the small cam and those heads...the cam does not allow the engine to take in the air it needs and those heads can support. C
Old 11-12-2010, 11:39 PM
  #10  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

What RPM do you want to spin it to? If TQ move up in the RPM (which is typically what a cam does) you'll make more HP.
Old 11-13-2010, 05:51 AM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

You're very timing limited. These heads need timing up around 28-29 to make good power. You're probaly missing 25-30RWHP.

Enjoy your stump puller though...
Old 11-13-2010, 08:03 AM
  #12  
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
ctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sicamous, BC
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Is the knock real?

I went thru the knock thing with my LS2, could not even run the base timing. Colder plug's & some re working of knock retard attack/decay tables & the power improved. There is more to gained yet, I'm parked for the winter.

That is with Canadian BC gas by the way.....not BC Bud.
Old 11-13-2010, 10:28 AM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Jditlfm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brockport NY
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WKMCD
You're very timing limited. These heads need timing up around 28-29 to make good power. You're probaly missing 25-30RWHP.

Enjoy your stump puller though...
Have you had any first hand experience with that? Im curious as when i dynoed a 418 ls3 motor i saw absolutely no gain going from 22-27 of total timing. afr was consistent.
Old 11-13-2010, 11:06 AM
  #14  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

It seams like the L92/LS3 heads can take alot of timing but his car makes so much midrange with a lower rpm peak that it could very well use little timing.
Old 11-13-2010, 12:30 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
PwrdbyLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I would like to peak around 6500 rpm, so I'll need a bigger cam to move the powerband higher. A cam that will lower my dynamic compression so I'll be able to put more timing and gain more hp.

I dont know if the knock is real, its a stock timing table from a 2010 Camaro SS LS3. I have similar compression to a LS3 and a bigger cam so... Can a bad knock sensor can see a false knock?

My plugs are BR7EF, is this plugs cold enough?
Old 11-13-2010, 02:48 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jditlfm
Have you had any first hand experience with that? Im curious as when i dynoed a 418 ls3 motor i saw absolutely no gain going from 22-27 of total timing. afr was consistent.
Yes...
Old 11-13-2010, 03:42 PM
  #17  
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
ctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sicamous, BC
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by WKMCD
Yes...
You are a funny guy! You have the 6 cylinder used in previous threads?
Old 11-13-2010, 05:50 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Jditlfm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brockport NY
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hmm i wonder why mine was relatively unresponsive. Maybe i will make some changes at the track and see if i pick up some mph next year.
Old 11-13-2010, 09:08 PM
  #19  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: murrieta
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PwrdbyLS1
I would like to peak around 6500 rpm, so I'll need a bigger cam to move the powerband higher. A cam that will lower my dynamic compression so I'll be able to put more timing and gain more hp.

I dont know if the knock is real, its a stock timing table from a 2010 Camaro SS LS3. I have similar compression to a LS3 and a bigger cam so... Can a bad knock sensor can see a false knock?

My plugs are BR7EF, is this plugs cold enough?
what computer are you running? is it a factory 4th gen computer? if so how are you using a 2010 camaro timing table, you cant copy and paste those two tables back and forth the resolution is different.... 22.5 degrees doesnt surprise me if the cam is small and your dynamic is high.... on 91 octane we have (california) i rarely get more then 24 degrees in a 10.5:1+ motor with a real world load, this might be your same issue... the mid range doesnt look real strong though which is another indication of your high Dynamic compression

Last edited by Ryne @ CMS; 11-13-2010 at 09:29 PM.
Old 11-14-2010, 09:31 AM
  #20  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Jenson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

So on a DJ with a stock 10 bolt you'd probably be looking at 460ish. And in my opinion at least 20 more up top with a free flowing intake tract and fast 102 with some 1-7/8 headers. I also had a lot of knock issues once I started real mods, it was all in my knock table. It was way to aggressive compared to every other .bin I looked at. Same issue ctd referenced. Were those runs in third gear?


Quick Reply: LQ9 404ci L92 heads/LS3 intake



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.