440/406 - Torquer V2 Cam/Stock 243s
11-21-2010, 03:13 AM
#1
440/406 - Torquer V2 Cam/Stock 243s Made 440/406. Came in with a lot of issues in the previous tune and had Brian @ Reckart Performance fix them up a bit at his dyno day. It made 400/350 before Brian's tuning. Almost 60 rwtq and 40 rwhp in the tune alone.
Was just wanting these numbers as a baseline for when I install the intake and all the other fuel upgrades I'm putting on soon. Overall I'm really pleased with the results considering I'm still on the stock intake. I feel like if Brian had done a full tune on it he could have squeaked out a bit more, but I'll let him do that once I put the FAST 92/92 on.
Mod list:
Torquer V2 Cam
Stock 243s
LS6 Intake
SLP Lid
ASP Underdrive Pulleys
T56
10 bolt, 4.10s
Speed Density Tune
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzXB82Ob8LE
Was just wanting these numbers as a baseline for when I install the intake and all the other fuel upgrades I'm putting on soon. Overall I'm really pleased with the results considering I'm still on the stock intake. I feel like if Brian had done a full tune on it he could have squeaked out a bit more, but I'll let him do that once I put the FAST 92/92 on.
Mod list:
Torquer V2 Cam
Stock 243s
LS6 Intake
SLP Lid
ASP Underdrive Pulleys
T56
10 bolt, 4.10s
Speed Density Tune
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzXB82Ob8LE
Last edited by westtexasbuff; 11-21-2010 at 11:51 AM.
Trending Topics
Added the dyno sheet, forgot to add it last night... 
11-21-2010, 09:23 PM
#14
Not trying to be a hater, but that reeks of fish.
-40rwhp from a "tune alone" on a 400rwhp cammed/243 car? I don't buy it. 400/350 is right around what the car should be making for those mods.
-I've done 5-10 T2's and never seen one make north of 410rwhp with any stock GM casting. That includes 241's, 243's, and 317's.
-Put the car on a dynojet and get an A/F reading. I could see 420 out of that combo, but 440 isn't happening in the legit world of dyno #s IMO.
-40rwhp from a "tune alone" on a 400rwhp cammed/243 car? I don't buy it. 400/350 is right around what the car should be making for those mods.
-I've done 5-10 T2's and never seen one make north of 410rwhp with any stock GM casting. That includes 241's, 243's, and 317's.
-Put the car on a dynojet and get an A/F reading. I could see 420 out of that combo, but 440 isn't happening in the legit world of dyno #s IMO.
11-21-2010, 10:44 PM
#16
Not trying to be a hater, but that reeks of fish.
-40rwhp from a "tune alone" on a 400rwhp cammed/243 car? I don't buy it. 400/350 is right around what the car should be making for those mods.
-I've done 5-10 T2's and never seen one make north of 410rwhp with any stock GM casting. That includes 241's, 243's, and 317's.
-Put the car on a dynojet and get an A/F reading. I could see 420 out of that combo, but 440 isn't happening in the legit world of dyno #s IMO.
-40rwhp from a "tune alone" on a 400rwhp cammed/243 car? I don't buy it. 400/350 is right around what the car should be making for those mods.
-I've done 5-10 T2's and never seen one make north of 410rwhp with any stock GM casting. That includes 241's, 243's, and 317's.
-Put the car on a dynojet and get an A/F reading. I could see 420 out of that combo, but 440 isn't happening in the legit world of dyno #s IMO.
The previous tune was ****, it was on 13 degrees of timing at WOT... we bumped it to 26 (which is where it should have been before) thus the reason for the huge gains. And I did get an A/F reading.
Basically, the previous person I had tune the car obviously did not know what they were doing...
11-22-2010, 11:34 AM
#17
440 is pretty high for a dyno jet, but remember dynos are for tuning not bench racing.. Use the dyno for a before & after, that's always the best way to use it!
Hope your happy! Let us know if you ever want to swap to a sweet set of PRC 227 or 215 castings!!
Hope your happy! Let us know if you ever want to swap to a sweet set of PRC 227 or 215 castings!!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
11-22-2010, 11:51 AM
#18
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This was on a dynapac chassis dyno. I ran my car a couple hours before his car. My 1999 Formula is headers/exhaust/lid, and ran 302/324, a bolt on LT1 ran 284/34x. The dyno seemed pretty consistent. And if he had the same guy tune his car that tuned my 1989...then he definitely had 40_rwhp left in the tune LOL
BTW, I hope my 1989 Formula does as good after Brian tunes it. It's HCIE LQ4, same cam, hogged out shaved 241 with bigger valves. If I get 410rwhp I'll be content.
BTW, I hope my 1989 Formula does as good after Brian tunes it. It's HCIE LQ4, same cam, hogged out shaved 241 with bigger valves. If I get 410rwhp I'll be content.
11-22-2010, 12:24 PM
#20
Not trying to be a hater, but that reeks of fish.
-40rwhp from a "tune alone" on a 400rwhp cammed/243 car? I don't buy it. 400/350 is right around what the car should be making for those mods.
-I've done 5-10 T2's and never seen one make north of 410rwhp with any stock GM casting. That includes 241's, 243's, and 317's.
-Put the car on a dynojet and get an A/F reading. I could see 420 out of that combo, but 440 isn't happening in the legit world of dyno #s IMO.
-40rwhp from a "tune alone" on a 400rwhp cammed/243 car? I don't buy it. 400/350 is right around what the car should be making for those mods.
-I've done 5-10 T2's and never seen one make north of 410rwhp with any stock GM casting. That includes 241's, 243's, and 317's.
-Put the car on a dynojet and get an A/F reading. I could see 420 out of that combo, but 440 isn't happening in the legit world of dyno #s IMO.