**NON LSX** 2009 Cobalt SS/TC
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
**NON LSX** 2009 Cobalt SS/TC
Hello,
Just wanted to share what I was able to achieve with my near mechanically stock SS/TC Sedan. No where near what my SS and GTO put down but still fun
I'm running a 1:1 mixture of E85/91 octane, 3 BAR map sensors and my own street tuning (thank god for factory WB!!). Oh and I can't forget my daughters awesome hot pink booster seat!
22lbs, 23* and running .898 lambda.
Unfortunately, the power falls off up top due to a few things:
Car is still making 297whp by 6k RPM and 281whp by 6500.
Thanks for looking!
Just wanted to share what I was able to achieve with my near mechanically stock SS/TC Sedan. No where near what my SS and GTO put down but still fun
I'm running a 1:1 mixture of E85/91 octane, 3 BAR map sensors and my own street tuning (thank god for factory WB!!). Oh and I can't forget my daughters awesome hot pink booster seat!
22lbs, 23* and running .898 lambda.
Unfortunately, the power falls off up top due to a few things:
- Wastegate is electronically controlled by the ECU to 64-75% after a certain load/RPM.
- Stock accordion intake hose
- Stock dual cat downpipe.
Car is still making 297whp by 6k RPM and 281whp by 6500.
Thanks for looking!
#6
On The Tree
Thread Starter
For a port fuel injected motor, yes. This car is GDI and prefers a leaner burning mixture and can get away with it due to it's innate ability to cool the intake charge. Also, the Ethanol has amazing additional cooling properties/knock suppression ability as well.
Do keep in mind that the dyno was using a sniffer at the tail pipe, after two cats. The car comes from the factory with an on board wide band and continuously runs in CL, even at WOT. It's safe.
Trending Topics
#10
he's got a turbo one.
and these cars love lean afr's
I built a gt3076r 09 tc running 32psi on pump gas (93 octane) and 12.8:1 afr Thing was a monster for a stock 4 banger.
and these cars love lean afr's
I built a gt3076r 09 tc running 32psi on pump gas (93 octane) and 12.8:1 afr Thing was a monster for a stock 4 banger.
#12
On The Tree
Thread Starter
No worries man. Enjoy your LSJ, it's a great DD as well.
#13
TECH Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At that air fuel there is no doubt that it will make more power, but the cylinder temps and egt's will rise quickly. If you're out running it, don't keep your foot in it very long or you'll be buying a piston or two. I understand the direct injection and the E85 in the mixture, but I wouldn't shoot for much higher than a .86 Lambada. Do you have an EGT gauge in the car?
#14
On The Tree
Thread Starter
At that air fuel there is no doubt that it will make more power, but the cylinder temps and egt's will rise quickly. If you're out running it, don't keep your foot in it very long or you'll be buying a piston or two. I understand the direct injection and the E85 in the mixture, but I wouldn't shoot for much higher than a .86 Lambada. Do you have an EGT gauge in the car?
Car isn't seeing sustained 130+ mph blasts, ever.
You'd **** if you saw how lean GM run's them, stock and with their stage 1 update.
#15
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
has anyone put in a turbo cam in one of these things yet. in a few years these cars will be enticing with the right price.
how big is the aftermarket for them?
to the OP, it must be a fine ride...
how big is the aftermarket for them?
to the OP, it must be a fine ride...
#16
I had a decent set of cams in my lsj based build, pulled to 9600 rpm made flat power up to 8600rpm before it started to dive, and that was on a reduced base circle regrind of a mild turbo cam (hks 272's)
Here's a few cars I built last year.
my car (2006 ss/sc w/60-1 m2race head etc)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFI3KICvQKw
2009 ss/tc on 26 psi (this pull, cam died before the 32psi run)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b27gO7uNwg
2007 cobalt ss/sc w/ hp5857 swap. stock motor, stock fuel pump, stock fuel line, stock rail, and 79lb injectors.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx7memhzX-I
Here's a few cars I built last year.
my car (2006 ss/sc w/60-1 m2race head etc)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFI3KICvQKw
2009 ss/tc on 26 psi (this pull, cam died before the 32psi run)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b27gO7uNwg
2007 cobalt ss/sc w/ hp5857 swap. stock motor, stock fuel pump, stock fuel line, stock rail, and 79lb injectors.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx7memhzX-I
#18
TECH Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ECM uses an algorithm to determine EGT's, no actual on board EGT gauge. Car stays much, much cooler based off of the calculation on E47 versus gasoline.
Car isn't seeing sustained 130+ mph blasts, ever.
You'd **** if you saw how lean GM run's them, stock and with their stage 1 update.
Car isn't seeing sustained 130+ mph blasts, ever.
You'd **** if you saw how lean GM run's them, stock and with their stage 1 update.
#19
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure you've been to Cobaltss forums. I used to post there a lot when I had my SC Cobalt. I think I ran across a thread not too long ago when some of the guys were putting out 411 ft-lb of torque with the stock turbo.
#20
On The Tree
Thread Starter
To be honest, turbo cams are a waste unless you're putting a large turbo on the car that won't really make power without some serious RPM.
I have seen it. That's why there is so much power to be gained in tuning them. With the stock and the stage 1 tune they are a knock retarding pig. E85 is still on the edge of it's ability, but I think the manufactures are still working on the full advantages of it, but the lack of stations having it are the problem. Smaller motors with boost and E85 could possibly be future of the industry. We really need to get them to use a damn content sensor again though and get rid of this estimated content system based on fuel trim calculations.
I agree, they were brilliant in the fact they used an on-board WB but definitely need a real EGT sensor.
I try not to post much as it's a bit retarded over there but yes, I browse. Yea, with some proper tuning and a few bolt ons, the K04 can produce some pretty impressive numbers so long as you aren't pushing it wayyyy out of efficiency.