EPS cam/243 heads prediction! Updated!
03-14-2011, 08:24 PM
#41
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I actually just got the last parts I needed last week. This thing should be buttoned up within the next two weeks if Im lucky. I've been real busy with school, so I haven't gotten a chance to have it installed. I will definitely post up results after the install and after the tune. Thanks for inquiring.
03-25-2011, 09:16 AM
#45
That sucks, that's actually the reason my car got a Comp cam instead of a Thunder Racing cam...ordered it with plans to install in 2 weeks and was told the cam wouldn't ship for 3 so I had no choice, the wait would have ruined my time off work schedule for getting the engine swap done.
04-06-2011, 11:07 PM
#47
My car has a pat g spec'd EPS 230/234 cam, stock 243 heads and thinner head gaskets to bump compression. Its also a m6 with 4.10 gears it made 391rwhp and 371rwtq on a mustang dyno a few months back.
04-07-2011, 09:33 AM
#49
Mine car has a larger cam and a little more compression. I don't have an under drive pulley though. I also had 4.10 gears and 17X11 rims that rob power. Id say the cars will be close. Heres my dyno sheet.
04-22-2011, 05:02 PM
#52
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The car is finally in the shop. Should have results by late next week. I'll let you all know how the car dyno's after the heads/cam. Oh and I won't be going with the underdrive pulley after all.
05-04-2011, 08:03 AM
#55
Oh I didn't see you updated it. I would say those are decent numbers. Mine has a bigger eps cam 230/234 and I have a little more compression but I do have 4.10 gears and heavy *** rims I only put down 391rwhp and 371rwtq on vectors mustang dyno.
Its known to be a low reading dyno even for a mustang dyno from what I've been reading. On a dynojet my car would read a good amount higher so considering I have a bigger cam and more compression Id say your on par with my car.
Its known to be a low reading dyno even for a mustang dyno from what I've been reading. On a dynojet my car would read a good amount higher so considering I have a bigger cam and more compression Id say your on par with my car.
05-25-2011, 09:46 AM
#56
Did you have the cam installed and tuned? May I ask, why did you decided to delete the under drive pulley from your install?
05-25-2011, 10:05 AM
#57
Your numbers are low. I've seen guys with eps 226 cams w/ 241 heads put down 400+. Have you look into why you haven't broke 400?
05-25-2011, 10:17 AM
#58
They didn't do 400+ on vectors mustang dyno. The torque curve on my car looks good also if there was a problem with my engine chances are it would show up on the torque curve.
