2002 camaro with ls6 cam and slipping verter
02-07-2011, 04:43 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 camaro with ls6 cam and slipping verter Here is my dyno graphs. The best it did was 341hp and 304tq on a mustang dyno. Tunetime performance in toms river NJ did the tune.
My mods are. ls6 cam,ls6 intake,slp udp,slp lid/k&N,flowmaster exhaust and a 3200 stall fuddel converter that was slipping hence why the tq is low. I know it need long tubes. I plan on amr 1 7/8 long tubes and a new verter soon.
Anyone have a comparable mustang dyno to my mods?
The bottom graph was my best but as you can see it has a voltage prob in the middle of the graph.
My mods are. ls6 cam,ls6 intake,slp udp,slp lid/k&N,flowmaster exhaust and a 3200 stall fuddel converter that was slipping hence why the tq is low. I know it need long tubes. I plan on amr 1 7/8 long tubes and a new verter soon.
Anyone have a comparable mustang dyno to my mods?
The bottom graph was my best but as you can see it has a voltage prob in the middle of the graph.
02-08-2011, 03:50 PM
#4
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea The car has no cats and had a slp loudmouth on it. I could not stand it. So I installed the flowmaster cat back to quiet it down. I am going to buy a vigilate converter and see if that makes a difference. I have ported 243 heads, 228-232 cam and a strange 12 bolt to install. Then I will start saving up for a forged bottom end.
02-09-2011, 08:59 PM
#7
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good numbers. Is that on stock exhaust manifolds? Years ago I ran a similar setup (Yank 3200, bolt ons, etc) but with MAC headers and made almost exactly those numbers (more tq) so I think yours still has more in it. As always the key when using the LS6 cam is you need to shift at least at 6600 rpms to really maximize the gains. Notice how the curve lays nearly flat from peak to 6500 rpms. The hp difference between stock and the LS6 is amazing at that rpm.
BTW - Give Chris at Circe D a call if you're looking for a new converter. They make a great converter (tell him what your goals are) and offer exceptional customer service as well.
BTW - Give Chris at Circe D a call if you're looking for a new converter. They make a great converter (tell him what your goals are) and offer exceptional customer service as well.
Trending Topics
02-10-2011, 12:15 AM
#9
Yea The car has no cats and had a slp loudmouth on it. I could not stand it. So I installed the flowmaster cat back to quiet it down. I am going to buy a vigilate converter and see if that makes a difference. I have ported 243 heads, 228-232 cam and a strange 12 bolt to install. Then I will start saving up for a forged bottom end.
[QUOTE=darooke;14481787]
Id bet he is right around 380 if i was guessing.
02-10-2011, 07:45 AM
#13
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good numbers. Is that on stock exhaust manifolds? Years ago I ran a similar setup (Yank 3200, bolt ons, etc) but with MAC headers and made almost exactly those numbers (more tq) so I think yours still has more in it. As always the key when using the LS6 cam is you need to shift at least at 6600 rpms to really maximize the gains. Notice how the curve lays nearly flat from peak to 6500 rpms. The hp difference between stock and the LS6 is amazing at that rpm.
BTW - Give Chris at Circe D a call if you're looking for a new converter. They make a great converter (tell him what your goals are) and offer exceptional customer service as well.
BTW - Give Chris at Circe D a call if you're looking for a new converter. They make a great converter (tell him what your goals are) and offer exceptional customer service as well.
