413/403 FMS cam only street customer
02-17-2004, 11:38 PM
#1
413/403 FMS cam only street customer Im making a new post since Scotts went downhill fast.
Heres the graph
http://community.webshots.com/user/cammin
Please click on Scotts dyno to see the graph.
Cam is the Futral Motorsports F10 (228/228)
Bolt ons include, Kooks LTs, ORY, GMMG catback,Cammin BeaSSt ported TB,stock maf,stock pulley,lid and tuning by EvilZ28NOS
results speak for themselves. Not too shabby for a cam under 230 duration and drives with stock manners.
FWIW, All dyno pulls were with stock belt, stock pulley, through the GMMG and with a paper filter.
Lets try n keep this one on topic guys.... Thanx
Heres the graph
http://community.webshots.com/user/cammin
Please click on Scotts dyno to see the graph.
Cam is the Futral Motorsports F10 (228/228)
Bolt ons include, Kooks LTs, ORY, GMMG catback,Cammin BeaSSt ported TB,stock maf,stock pulley,lid and tuning by EvilZ28NOS
results speak for themselves. Not too shabby for a cam under 230 duration and drives with stock manners.
FWIW, All dyno pulls were with stock belt, stock pulley, through the GMMG and with a paper filter.
Lets try n keep this one on topic guys.... Thanx
02-18-2004, 10:26 AM
#6
TECH Veteran
Originally Posted by jrp
would you guys stopped putting out good numbers dammit, your gonna make me have to buy one of your cams 
but seriously, im thinking of getting a custom grind, i have a T1 but im not sure if i want to put in it now. You guys do any cali grinds?
but seriously, im thinking of getting a custom grind, i have a T1 but im not sure if i want to put in it now. You guys do any cali grinds?
Trending Topics
02-18-2004, 06:44 PM
#8
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice graph and numbers. Where does this cam pick up HP as compared to the 226? Is the gain just up top? Is there any loss to the bottom end? Its hard to compare numbers and graphs from different cars, so I hope one of you FMS boys would know the deal. Im looking at Mike H.'s graph but its through an auto and scott's is through an M6 corrrect? Thanks.
I had my heart set on the 226 but now you guys had to bring out some good numbers on this cam. Congrats.
I had my heart set on the 226 but now you guys had to bring out some good numbers on this cam. Congrats.
02-19-2004, 09:02 AM
#10
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Revelation I'd say this cam looks to make more power up top. You dont really need to worry too much about low end power because of the stall convertor. It looks as if the 228 made a little more power at 4500 though! I'd imagine the idle quality out of this cam is very similar to the 226. This cam seems like a good choice over the 226.
The .581 lift should be safe with comp 26918's too.
The .581 lift should be safe with comp 26918's too.
02-19-2004, 10:40 AM
#11
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Destin FL
Posts: 4,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLKWS6
ahhh...shaddup...
Looking forward to what Allan can get out of mine with basically the same setup, F11. Wish it wasn't a month away
02-19-2004, 10:42 AM
#12
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Hoffpauir
Revelation I'd say this cam looks to make more power up top. You dont really need to worry too much about low end power because of the stall convertor. It looks as if the 228 made a little more power at 4500 though! I'd imagine the idle quality out of this cam is very similar to the 226. This cam seems like a good choice over the 226.
The .581 lift should be safe with comp 26918's too.
The .581 lift should be safe with comp 26918's too.
