What cam would put down numbers like this?
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What cam would put down numbers like this?
Here is the thread I started giving a preliminary of all I know that is done to the car and showing an idle vid to try and find out what cam is in it.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/multimedi...ound-like.html
I just got the car dynoed today. First run is cutout closed, 2nd is open. I have no idea if headwork was done or not.
Numbers are hard to read... closed is 364.59 HP 365.10 TQ. open is 370.94 HP 367.73 TQ
https://ls1tech.com/forums/multimedi...ound-like.html
I just got the car dynoed today. First run is cutout closed, 2nd is open. I have no idea if headwork was done or not.
Numbers are hard to read... closed is 364.59 HP 365.10 TQ. open is 370.94 HP 367.73 TQ
Trending Topics
#9
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
I would blame the shorty headers and ls1 intake for the low numbers more than the cam. The numbers aren't even that bad.
Warning ricer math ahead: Figure it likely picks up at least 10-15rwhp with a ls6 intake (and revs better) and minimum 5-10rwhp with longtubes and he is right there ~385+rwhp.
Pretty typical for a small cam ls1 on a dyno that isn't overly optimistic.
Warning ricer math ahead: Figure it likely picks up at least 10-15rwhp with a ls6 intake (and revs better) and minimum 5-10rwhp with longtubes and he is right there ~385+rwhp.
Pretty typical for a small cam ls1 on a dyno that isn't overly optimistic.
#10
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (51)
I would blame the shorty headers and ls1 intake for the low numbers more than the cam. The numbers aren't even that bad.
Warning ricer math ahead: Figure it likely picks up at least 10-15rwhp with a ls6 intake (and revs better) and minimum 5-10rwhp with longtubes and he is right there ~385+rwhp.
Pretty typical for a small cam ls1 on a dyno that isn't overly optimistic.
Warning ricer math ahead: Figure it likely picks up at least 10-15rwhp with a ls6 intake (and revs better) and minimum 5-10rwhp with longtubes and he is right there ~385+rwhp.
Pretty typical for a small cam ls1 on a dyno that isn't overly optimistic.
#11
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea whats so bad about my numbers?? I was impressed given it has shorties and stock intake. It's also pretty rich up top. Plus I like the fact i don't have to rev it to the moon for peak power.
#14
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes my a/f was around 11.4. I have no intentions of changing this cam out. The car is my daily driver and I was pretty pleased with the numbers. It drives like a stock car.
Last edited by mean_greenZ; 04-13-2011 at 11:56 PM.
#18
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also the running rich issue when I had it dynoed was due to me putting a stock MAF on it. I bought the car with a SLP 85mm and noticed the car would spark knock. I thought it was the big MAF causing it because I had no clue any of this was done. And I found out the guy had the car dyno tuned WITH the 85mm MAF. The crappy plug and wire change that the guy I bought it from was causing the spark knock.
The car originally dynoed 380hp 379tq. So I think by me putting the 85mm maf back on it should be back up to the numbers it originally put down.
Speed INc. dyno tuned it back then.
I thank him for creating such a quiet, mild-mannered combo that drives like stock and runs phenomenal!