FAST 102 on stock cubes?
#4
My setup is:
228r cam
TEA Stg. 2.5 5.3 heads
LS6 Intake
M6 w/ Monster Stg III clutch
Steel D/S
MWC Fab 9" w/ 3.90s
Pacesetter headers
TSP Y pipe w/ a bullet dumped
And I just put a cutout in like 2 days ago, no idea if the car picked up any w/ it.
Any guesses as to what my car would pick up?
Oh, and thanks for posting up Chris1313s results... That car gives me motivation lol.
228r cam
TEA Stg. 2.5 5.3 heads
LS6 Intake
M6 w/ Monster Stg III clutch
Steel D/S
MWC Fab 9" w/ 3.90s
Pacesetter headers
TSP Y pipe w/ a bullet dumped
And I just put a cutout in like 2 days ago, no idea if the car picked up any w/ it.
Any guesses as to what my car would pick up?
Oh, and thanks for posting up Chris1313s results... That car gives me motivation lol.
#5
By swapping your LS6 intake to stock FAST 102, I estimate a gain of 12-15 rwhp especially that you have CNC ported heads. With a ported 102, I think that you can reach a gain of 20-23 rwhp
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
How about instead of buying a new intake/tb/rails put that money towards a forged rotating assembly?
Its what I wish I would have done instead of spending 1500ish$ on a ported 102/92 rails setup.
You spray so it would give you some peace of mind and allow you to spray a larger shot. More reliable car and way more power than the intake is capable of allowing with not a WHOLE lot more money.
Its what I wish I would have done instead of spending 1500ish$ on a ported 102/92 rails setup.
You spray so it would give you some peace of mind and allow you to spray a larger shot. More reliable car and way more power than the intake is capable of allowing with not a WHOLE lot more money.
Trending Topics
#8
How about instead of buying a new intake/tb/rails put that money towards a forged rotating assembly?
Its what I wish I would have done instead of spending 1500ish$ on a ported 102/92 rails setup.
You spray so it would give you some peace of mind and allow you to spray a larger shot. More reliable car and way more power than the intake is capable of allowing with not a WHOLE lot more money.
Its what I wish I would have done instead of spending 1500ish$ on a ported 102/92 rails setup.
You spray so it would give you some peace of mind and allow you to spray a larger shot. More reliable car and way more power than the intake is capable of allowing with not a WHOLE lot more money.
#10
I don't know how people compare the cost of FAST intake to the cost of a stroker that will cost 3K+ with installation and tuning !!
I'd try to get the most power out of my engine before going for a stroker.
I'd try to get the most power out of my engine before going for a stroker.
#12
That's kinda what I'm doing right now.
Not sure how much a ported one is. Installation at most shops generally is $80 per hr. That's a good average cost. Tuning, it all depends on who you go to. My tuner is only going to charge me dyno time, and I'll be doing the installation myself. Not like it's really that difficult.
#14
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
You could most certainly piece together a new assembly for under 1500.
Add 800ish or so for machining.
So for an extra 700-1200$, depending on what you want and how you buy it, you have a forged 347.
My tune runs 200$ no matter what... And I would pull and install the motor myself.
I'm not arguing.. I put my idea and what I wish I would have done out there. It's not what you want and its not a big deal.
Not a 347..
#18
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Um very close to the same and the reliable hp is in the setup and tune. ask noz thats why he went 9.30's with a stock 346 and ls6 headed motor on a 200 shot and that was on a safe tune. and once again what ggod is a bigger motor if you dont have the lungs meaning heads and intake setup to support it.
#19
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
Um very close to the same and the reliable hp is in the setup and tune. ask noz thats why he went 9.30's with a stock 346 and ls6 headed motor on a 200 shot and that was on a safe tune. and once again what ggod is a bigger motor if you dont have the lungs meaning heads and intake setup to support it.
I would much rather spray a 250 hit on a forged 347 than a stock 346, as would anybody. Especially since this Is his DD.
I'm fully aware of what stock block ls1s are doing on the jug. Tick just posted his stock short times up on a 250hit with a cam only motor, it could easily hit 5s@almost 120. However, a 347 would last a Hell of a lot longer than a 346 on any setup with a decent power adder, given same tune etc... It is forged.
Also we are talking sub 3k# cars as well, not street cars.
Roll your eyes all you want. It was my opinion. I think going to a fast 102 isn't the best next best mod for him and you don't think a rotating assembly is... So be it. I personally would rather want to spend am extra grand and reliably spray a 250-300 hit, the potential is way greater with that then it is with a fast 102 setup. I'm done now, you got my input.
#20
I am still lost how we got on the spray...the original post said nothing about nitrous...
check out what tick just ram with a non optomial setup cam only with a glide 6.05 in the 1/8th
obviously a 347 is going to be more reliable but you pay for that plus I would take a good *** tuner/ nitrous on a 346 over Joe nitrous junky on a 347 anyday of the week...I have seen plently of holes in 347s and only on a 200 shot...
check out what tick just ram with a non optomial setup cam only with a glide 6.05 in the 1/8th
obviously a 347 is going to be more reliable but you pay for that plus I would take a good *** tuner/ nitrous on a 346 over Joe nitrous junky on a 347 anyday of the week...I have seen plently of holes in 347s and only on a 200 shot...