2000NemeSS

iTrader: (2)

These are untuned numbers, money is a little low right now so couldnt afford a tune, just wanted to see my base numbers, check out my signature for my mods.

itsslow98

iTrader: (18)

Pretty lean but good numbers.

2000NemeSS

iTrader: (2)

thanks, I was surprised being its untuned with just a few goodies. With an underdrive and a dyno tune I would assume I can hit 375 rwhp. Not bad at all for a bolt on car.

My first run was really lean, it actually stumbled when the tech floored it. As soon as I get a few more Benjamins in my pocket I will get a tune. Might do a Frost tune, not sure yet. But all in all very impressed with the numbers being on stock heads and stock cam untuned.

thunderstruck507

iTrader: (18)

Not likely, and if so it would be nothing more than an inflated number.

Your numbers are already on the high side of normal. Have you been to the track yet?

djfury05

iTrader: (30)

I vote to put the screen back into the maf.

ramairetransam

iTrader: (18)

put the maf screen in and have a frost tune .

Lee12609

iTrader: (3)

just a giving dyno.

s346k

iTrader: (4)

curve looks good, as all stock ls1 cars do.

why the waves at the end? what year and how many miles are on that car? 2000 i assume..?

looks like a generous dyno. i'd guess the car doesn't trap much over 110 at full weight.

2000NemeSS

iTrader: (2)

Ive been to the track, but on street tires, my clutch master cylinder is really worn and sticks to the floor at high rpms, so that alone is killing my 1/4... Best Ive done is 13.2 @ 108 with a 2.1 60ft. Of course with DR's and some of the car Gods looking over my rear when launching, and a working MC then 12's are easily capable, but she is my daily driver and Im trying to keep it that way for awhile... my car now has 87k on it. For what the sticky says on Bolt On mods these cars are capable of 380rwhp on tune and bolt ons only, which at this rate I see that is entirely possible.

And yes the car is running lean, maybe thats from the Mass Air with no screen? bought the car like that with no screen, so I wasnt able to notice the difference before and after.

redbird555

iTrader: (14)

380 is not a bolt on ls1.... with full bolt ons on an m6 is about 350whp on a dynojet. at the track I'd see your car with a tune and the rest of the bolt ons running mid 12's at 113ish which is normal for a bolt on m6.

karpetcm

iTrader: (2)

I have to agree with above a bolt on LS1 will not hit 370+rwhp. Usually its a 340-360 tops rwhp. Yes some dyno lower then that also depends if you have a A4 or M6. If i pulled off a 360+ on the dyno i would without a doubt question the shop and tell him to double check everything and do another run and without a doubt make sure they are corrected numbers. I would hate to have a camaro pull off 375rwhp and run 108-110mph, lol.

thunderstruck507

iTrader: (18)

I'm fairly sure the 380hp referenced in the sticky is talking about crank HP which is totally believable and some might even do better.

There are a lot of ls1 cars with bolt ons and a cam which will make around 370-390rwhp on a normal dyno. If you bought the car used it is always possible a tiny ls6 cam or something similar was swapped in by the previous owner (but your graph does not look like a cam car).

More likely, the particular dyno just has a slightly inflated calibration. Hence why they are tools, not gospel. Either way your car runs good for the mods and you should be proud. Not trying to bust *****, just want to inform.

2000NemeSS

iTrader: (2)

I can understand that. I know the 1/4 thing is all in the driver, you could have a high horsepower car with a shitty driver doing 106-109mph. Then you see the freaks with damn near stock running the same. It had a few pulls but this is the one I put up on here. They were all consistent. The best was 353hp but I the car stumbled on that particular dyno pull so I felt it wasnt a clean pull for me to post on here. So on their dynojet its consistent with 350hp. At least I can say I have a 350 horse bolt on car for now, considering there are wayy too many "car guys" out there with almost stock 5.0 foxbodies claiming to have 400+ hp with GT40 heads and an E cam. (sniff sniff, I call bull) At least I have proof Im almost there

2000NemeSS

iTrader: (2)

Oh also the sticky said plainly (how much am i making at the rear wheels?) and gives all estimated rwhp gains per mod, also stating that most cars are as you said, 360 tops bolt ons, BUT have seen some at 380 (this is with electric water pumps and underdrive pulley) both in which my car does not have... All in all, Im still surprising the new 5.0 mustangs with the brembo packages (not just brakes, but they have the 3.73s stock) so im happy once again

Lee12609

iTrader: (3)

you will not beat a new 5.0 sorry...... if you do its the driver.

2000NemeSS

iTrader: (2)

Well I have so... Call it what you want... Btw I work for Ford, I know them very well.

Blownbayou

iTrader: (7)

I put down the numbers in my sig last Friday with my mods in sig......... Your numbers do seem a little high without a tune though. Watch that A/F for sure.

Blownbayou

iTrader: (7)

LS6 intake though.... might be the reason for the higher numbers. I am running the LS1 intake and will be changing to the BBK soon

2000NemeSS

iTrader: (2)

Thanks, i noticed a nice difference with the intake, I also got those small little mods, tb bypass, stuff like that. I couldnt believe the difference in just the restriction within the ls6 vs ls1. The LS1 runner design sucks in comparison. But I thought it was high, it surprised me, but dyno's dont lie, esp a nice dynojet setup they had.

thunderstruck507

iTrader: (18)

I beg to differ greatly in opinion on that statement. My car with an old setup made 365rwhp one day and several months later on the same dyno with better exhaust and an underdrive pulley made 349rwhp.

But went to the track and it was .15 and 2mph faster in worse air and was noticeably stronger on the street.

Dynos are tools which are calibrated and require input from weather stations and operators. You can make one read just about whatever you want if you try. Slightly high reading dynos lead to happy customers. Happy customers are good for business.

If you mean same day testing of different parts then I would be more inclined to agree.