Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

TSP 408 results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2012, 07:58 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JC70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default TSP 408 results

501rwhp, 460rwtq mustang dyno
Car is a 2001 WS6 6 spped car with 12 bolt 3.73 gear

TSP 408 11.5:1 compression
LS3 CNC heads
LS3 intake
238/244 112LSA cam
Nick Williams TB
108mm FTP lid
TSP 100mm MAF
Hooker 1 3/4 headers


I wish I could get the tq number up a bit...maybe the headers?

I will post graph later....I cannot upload for some reason right now.
Old 06-01-2012, 09:23 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
Giddswat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Parkton, Md.
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice numbers! I am having a 408 built and I hope that I can get results like that. That should be a fun car to drive.
Old 06-01-2012, 11:06 AM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (51)
 
30th t/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 3,095
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC70SS
501rwhp, 460rwtq mustang dyno
Car is a 2001 WS6 6 spped car with 12 bolt 3.73 gear

TSP 408 11.5:1 compression
LS3 CNC heads
LS3 intake
238/244 112LSA cam
Nick Williams TB
108mm FTP lid
TSP 100mm MAF
Hooker 1 3/4 headers


I wish I could get the tq number up a bit...maybe the headers?

I will post graph later....I cannot upload for some reason right now.

A set of TFS 235s, FAST 102mm & 1 7/8 LTs would help out your combo bigtime. Id guess 540/500 with that setup. Not cheap though.
Old 06-01-2012, 11:59 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (32)
 
Rare96LT1Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 30th t/a
A set of TFS 235s, FAST 102mm & 1 7/8 LTs would help out your combo bigtime. Id guess 540/500 with that setup. Not cheap though.
I agree.

But why not keep the car as is? You have a 500rwhp monster. Any track times yet?
Old 06-01-2012, 12:01 PM
  #5  
FormerVendor
 
Sales1@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Congrats on the numbers. Very respectable numbers for being on a Mustang Dyno.
Old 06-01-2012, 01:39 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JC70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

no track times.

The heads fast 102 is not happening. I will do a D1/F1A in the future
Old 06-01-2012, 02:44 PM
  #7  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
99peweterls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree with keeping the motor as is but I'd simply just put a nice quality nitrous kit on the car and you'll be more than happy with it.
Old 06-01-2012, 02:45 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

No reason to switch to TFS unless it's preferance, headers could be bigger, SD tune and a bigger cam with a touch more exhaust duration would of made a Lil more hp n tq in my personal opinion. Is it an aluminum block or iron block 6.0?
Old 06-01-2012, 02:58 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by litle88
No reason to switch to TFS unless it's preferance, headers could be bigger, SD tune and a bigger cam with a touch more exhaust duration would of made a Lil more hp n tq in my personal opinion. Is it an aluminum block or iron block 6.0?
Must be an Iron if it is 408 ci, Alum 6.0 gets you 402 ci
Bigger cam would do the opposite of what you describe (especially with more exhaust duration)
Old 06-01-2012, 03:03 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Like stated before that is very respectful for a Mustang dyno. Who spec'd the cam?
Old 06-01-2012, 03:12 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JC70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It is an LQ9 block. John at Texas Speed specd it.

Yes I have been thinking possibly about a 125 dry shot as a possibility too.
Old 06-01-2012, 03:32 PM
  #12  
Launching!
 
SIC GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice numbers. I may end up doing something similar, but i wanna build a 408 with trick flow 235's and fast 102 really. Also a bigger cam.
Old 06-01-2012, 04:33 PM
  #13  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
99peweterls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JC70SS
It is an LQ9 block. John at Texas Speed specd it.

Yes I have been thinking possibly about a 125 dry shot as a possibility too.
You will love the torque then lol
Old 06-01-2012, 06:01 PM
  #14  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Must be an Iron if it is 408 ci, Alum 6.0 gets you 402 ci
Bigger cam would do the opposite of what you describe (especially with more exhaust duration)
Not trying to argue bud, just want to know why you say the opposite?

Gab at Comp was explaining to me the opposite with Ls3 heads.

"Talk to me Goose"
Old 06-01-2012, 07:27 PM
  #15  
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
ctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sicamous, BC
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

If the Mustang is as calibrated by Mustang.........Very Nice! It would be 550 RW on a DJ.

Stout!
Old 06-01-2012, 11:23 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
 
RoidedSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dude leave the car is and enjoy it. no point in dumping thousands of dollars to get another 20-40 rwhp unless you have money to blow. if that's the case, share the wealth!

that car probably makes close to 550 rwhp on a dynojet and in all honesty has a very streetable cam for that size of a motor.
Old 06-01-2012, 11:37 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Mazzenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

What's your exhaust set-up after the headers?
Looks like a strong combo!
Old 06-02-2012, 08:34 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JC70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

pace off road Y into magnaflow 3" stainless catback.
Old 06-02-2012, 11:02 AM
  #19  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
red fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arnaudville, LA
Posts: 836
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

"If" you just have to change something.... I would go to 1 7/8 headers and maybe have the intake port matched if you have not already. The 125 dry shot would be a home run , you would probley pick up 175-200rwtq with that depending on how soon you would bring it on.
Old 06-02-2012, 11:18 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
 
JUSTINSWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Td would give you more power all over and more tq.


Quick Reply: TSP 408 results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.