RAMPANT

iTrader: (17)

Nice curve, any reason you did not use SAE and used STD correction instead on the dyno? Stout numbers either way.

Sales2@Texas-speed

iTrader: (5)

Heck yea, Chris! Congrats! Time to hit the track soon???!!!

SStressin

iTrader: (5)

great numbers!

lt1773

iTrader: (1)

Stout numbers !!

DietCoke

iTrader: (18)

Looking to replace the mamofied fast102 with a LS7 holley hi-ram this winter, and have vengeance retune the car to match. Hoping for another 20-25 on top

chrs1313

iTrader: (24)

Graph looks to go unstable after 6700-6800 ish, what valvetrain is in it...

Badass numbers man especially through the auto!!

DietCoke

iTrader: (18)

Its tsp EHT .675 springs, shimmed to their specs. Nitrided LS7 rockers with trunion upgrade... nothing else works with these heads. I might end up with a larger .700 spring, but its not an overly radical cam lobe (LSL). That particular pull was the only one with that odd dip up top.

litle88

iTrader: (20)

Wth is it with these Chris's?! And these light racecars? Lol!

DietCoke

iTrader: (18)

race car?

you troll you. this is my environmentally conscious alternative fuel vehicle.

litle88

iTrader: (20)

Oops sorry bout that!!

Hopefully Obama will give you a tax credit for that too! Lol

Pray

iTrader: (7)

Wow, nice. You are inspireing me to follow through with my 429 project. It will be with cathedral port heads though. I hope you get your 9.9. Please post up when you get your Holley Highram. Can't decide on mani right now.

LIL SS

iTrader: (9)

Sorry if I missed it, but is this with stock heads?

litle88

iTrader: (20)

No TSP small bore Ls7 heads

DietCoke

iTrader: (18)

Some changes coming: Bigger headers (2" + merge collectors) and a holley hi-ram intake + retune at vengeance. Stay tuned.

Pray

iTrader: (7)

Please keep us posted on the Highram. I am very curious to see how much tq you loose. I am going to be putting a like sized motor in a TBSS so TQ is a must. The Holley is just so much cheaper than the FAST and looks so much better.

DietCoke

iTrader: (18)

Ill take the winpep file and overlay the two, so you can see the powerband difference. Believe me I'm just as curious as everyone else. The Mamo ported 102 was the best of the best, so it's quite an interesting comparison

adamantium

iTrader: (3)

Subscribed!

Pray

iTrader: (7)

The Winpep would be great. That will tell the real story at WOT.

Tony is one of the best. He can work magic with a FAST intake. The only issue with dyno numbers only is that they don't tell the driving story. So your impressions of every day situations would be great too. I am guessing that you loose two or three inches of runner lenth with the Holley but I don't know what that will translate into as far as more power and less tq. I would love to see it hold it's own.

DietCoke

iTrader: (18)

Yes. I have a large converter, so WOT any gain over 4800 is extra speed for me, which is where I expect the holley to surpass the FAST. Will certainly post driving impressions, but its fair to get the car tuned first.

Pray

iTrader: (7)

For sure get it tuned. Not a fair comparrison if not. I am looking at running a 3,600 stall but I am pushing around 4,800lbs vs. your 3,400. Just want to make the right decision and you have the closest build to what I want to do.