Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

This cant be right! or can it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2013, 12:11 PM
  #41  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Holy *****, just looked it up.

$5000 for anyone else wondering by how much they cant afford it
Old 01-31-2013, 12:35 PM
  #42  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
slow ride 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Anaheim Ca.
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RAMPANT
Thanks, 4 years ago it was pretty cool. Nicer stuff out now.

Check that adjuster though, you can take up any slack out of the cable with it. You have a traction control car, right? They are the only ones with single cable to the TB, unless the cruise was removed from a non TC car.
Nicer that that! OMG!

I took all of the slack out by putting it in the other hole on the T/B. But yes I have that adjuster, I just didnt know what it was. Thank you. My question is still un answered. Do I need to get my tune redone, because it was tuned when the T/B was only open about 75%?

Last edited by slow ride 02; 01-31-2013 at 08:05 PM.
Old 01-31-2013, 12:37 PM
  #43  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

yea I would
Old 01-31-2013, 12:52 PM
  #44  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
slow ride 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Anaheim Ca.
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by therabidweasel
So I have a feeling this might be your timing...which may be pulled due to your head gasket. If you are running 24 degrees of timing on 93 octane (just a for instance, you havent said) it might be due to your head gasket bore size. My heads are 61cc, they are mamofied 215s so not a direct comparison, but Tony has emphatically told me that I need 4.080 bore head gaskets because of the milling my chambers are wider and the big bore gaskets are required to prevent detonation.

To be honest, it didnt look that way when I held them up to the heads, but I am running 30 degrees right now with the big bore gaskets and I gained 25 ftlbs everywhere by advancing from 26 degrees. Thats through an a4 and a 9".

Im definitely no expert, but you might ask Tony since youre running AFRs.
I think that I see where you are going with this. Lets do the math.

Std bore is 3.900

Gaket is 3.910

Chamber is opened up to 4.00 (if reworked by Tony)

4.00
- 3.910
= .090 divide by 2 = .045 of gaket material not covered by the head, and exposed to chamber heat and a .005 lip from the gastket to the block. I found Tony telling someone that 4.030 gasket I.D. would be the min.
Old 01-31-2013, 02:38 PM
  #45  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
RAMPANT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,752
Received 25 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
Holy *****, just looked it up.

$5000 for anyone else wondering by how much they cant afford it
Yes not for the faint of heart. I have another $1200 in it for porting and custom throttle shafts and another $1400 in the plenums, silicone elbows and fabbed Y pipe.

I did it mostly for a smoother idle for emissions and quick throttle response for handling. Oddly, I was amazed what a difference this made to the car in a corner or coming off one.

Anyway hopefully the OP can find out the issue. I personally only use 25 degrees of timing in my 455. Typically I have seen a better head will need less timing to make power. If Tony says it could be an issue though, I would listen to him.

It does seem odd that the torque is peaking so late on the 2nd graph. In fact I would say you have not even seen the peak hp there, but if you have a stock bottom end with stock rod bolts, I would not rev it past 6700 rpm.

When the intake I have was only opening to what was shown as 80% in the PCM, we picked up 15rwhp at my power level with 100%. It does make a difference.
Old 01-31-2013, 09:08 PM
  #46  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thats not right. my ls1 afr heads made 463hp 414tq. maybe the dyno had an off day.
Old 01-31-2013, 09:29 PM
  #47  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
slow ride 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Anaheim Ca.
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mike c.
Thats not right. my ls1 afr heads made 463hp 414tq. maybe the dyno had an off day.
Those are very close to the numbers that I was looking for!
Old 02-05-2013, 01:00 PM
  #48  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

You cannot compare numbers from a Dyno Jet to a Mustang Dyno. It just doesn't work that way.

Take it back to the dyno jet you made your bolt on numbers on.
Old 02-11-2013, 09:01 PM
  #49  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
slow ride 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Anaheim Ca.
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
You cannot compare numbers from a Dyno Jet to a Mustang Dyno. It just doesn't work that way.

Take it back to the dyno jet you made your bolt on numbers on.
Okay guys, I took it back to the dyno that I made my bolt on numbers (343 rwhp/355 rwtq). It looks better 454 rwhp/403 rwtq. Thats 111 hp and 48 ftlbs of tq. But is really rich, and whats that dip in tq from 4,000 to 4,700?
Attached Thumbnails This cant be right! or can it?-new-dyno.jpg  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:07 AM
  #50  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slow ride 02
Okay guys, I took it back to the dyno that I made my bolt on numbers (343 rwhp/355 rwtq). It looks better 454 rwhp/403 rwtq. Thats 111 hp and 48 ftlbs of tq. But is really rich, and whats that dip in tq from 4,000 to 4,700?
From the exhaust and header guru's I've spoken to, it's from an inefficient collector and/or x-pipe cross-over or y-pipe merge that isn't allowing the exhaust gases to resonate at the proper frequencies which hurt exhaust scavenging. Until this "area" of the rpm range is passed and the frequencies begin to even out again you will see this dip in the torque curve.

Certain header designs are a lot more efficient than others. I know that LG has done a lot of research and experimentation with this very principal with their header and x-pipe design.

It does look pig rich though, tuner should of caught on to that quickly and leaned it out.
Old 02-13-2013, 08:12 PM
  #51  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
ds98formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joliet Illinois
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You plan on taking it back to the tunner to have them correct it?
Old 02-13-2013, 08:38 PM
  #52  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
slow ride 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Anaheim Ca.
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I took it back today. With both dyno sheets. They said it was fine, better a little rich than lean. He said would you rather lose 5 or 10 hp, or have a broken motor? He seemed offended that I questinoned his tune. He said that he would look at it, but not for two weeks, he is too busy, I need to get in line
Old 02-13-2013, 11:25 PM
  #53  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Find someone else to tune the car. Plain and simple, overly rich is dangerous as well as too lean.

It appears to be below 10-1 AFR in several spots
Below 11.5-1 on most the pull
Barely makes it to 12-1 at 6,400rpm

You would be amazed how much power can be picked up. It is very audible on the dyno. If he is willing to leave the fueling that bad, I am very curious as to know how bad the timing table looks.

If you don't get it fixed before the next time I get down there, I'd be willing to bring my HP Tuners if you could find a dyno to rent.
Old 02-13-2013, 11:26 PM
  #54  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
TeEnAgE pHeNoM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slow ride 02
I took it back today. With both dyno sheets. They said it was fine, better a little rich than lean. He said would you rather lose 5 or 10 hp, or have a broken motor? He seemed offended that I questinoned his tune. He said that he would look at it, but not for two weeks, he is too busy, I need to get in line
Broken motor. Lmao. The a/f should be a straight line across. That is no where close. It should not dip into the 11's on motor. It should be 12.2-12.6 on motor. Heck man I tune nitrous cars leaner than that guy has yours. It also looks like it needs some more timing down low and the mid range. That torque curve should be pretty damn flat with that heads and cam combo.
Old 02-14-2013, 10:17 AM
  #55  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
maxpower_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow ride 02
I took it back today. With both dyno sheets. They said it was fine, better a little rich than lean. He said would you rather lose 5 or 10 hp, or have a broken motor? He seemed offended that I questinoned his tune. He said that he would look at it, but not for two weeks, he is too busy, I need to get in line
I'd say neither - You need a new tuner. I agree with everyone else that the line he gave you is BS
Old 07-27-2014, 11:14 PM
  #56  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
slow ride 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Anaheim Ca.
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow ride 02
I think that I see where you are going with this. Lets do the math.

Std bore is 3.900

Gaket is 3.910

Chamber is opened up to 4.00 (if reworked by Tony)

4.00
- 3.910
= .090 divide by 2 = .045 of gaket material not covered by the head, and exposed to chamber heat and a .005 lip from the gastket to the block. I found Tony telling someone that 4.030 gasket I.D. would be the min.
Bump?
Old 07-28-2014, 12:39 AM
  #57  
Banned
 
98MysticGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Az
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just curious... have you even taken the car to the track yet and see what it runs 1/4
Old 12-09-2014, 12:03 AM
  #58  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
slow ride 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Anaheim Ca.
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98MysticGreen
Just curious... have you even taken the car to the track yet and see what it runs 1/4
I did take it to the track. It was only 1/8, and smoked my stock LS6 clutch on the first pass!



Quick Reply: This cant be right! or can it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.