06 C6 AI 226's and G6X3 dyno 486/447
02-21-2015, 11:16 AM
#61
I just sold the LS2 car but it was my daily driver and had mild surge below 1600 but with the MAF forward Halltech 103 with the LS3 maf with second to none tuning from Vengeance I would tell EVERYBODY looking for max n/a power to go with G6X3/TFS and a great tune- drove great
Now I need a max effort n/a setup for my LS7 and shoot for 640-650rwhp. I will document my results there too-
02-22-2015, 06:30 PM
#64
Staging Lane
I just sold the LS2 car but it was my daily driver and had mild surge below 1600 but with the MAF forward Halltech 103 with the LS3 maf with second to none tuning from Vengeance I would tell EVERYBODY looking for max n/a power to go with G6X3/TFS and a great tune- drove great
Now I need a max effort n/a setup for my LS7 and shoot for 640-650rwhp. I will document my results there too-
Now I need a max effort n/a setup for my LS7 and shoot for 640-650rwhp. I will document my results there too-
As for your ls7 build, good luck and keep us posted! I don't think those#should be to hard. Are you planning on porting ls7s or are you going with tfs again?
02-27-2015, 08:31 AM
#68
I looked on the LG website, and it says the G5 series cams were designed around the LS1, LS6, and LS2 engines, while the G6 series cams were designed to work with the LS3 engines. It goes on to say the G7 series cams were designed to work for the LS7 engines. While that may be true, it sure as hell seems that G6x3 cam worked quite well with the TFS cathedral port heads. Hell, maybe Louis himself will come into this thread and drop some knowledge on us.
02-28-2015, 02:31 PM
#72
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm on my 2nd LS7 and have had 3 sets of heads on my 2 cars. The first 2 sets of heads were stockers ported by Chris Frank, the third (my current setup) is stockers ported by PRC on their 265 program. What I have learned:
1) PRC's out performed the CF heads everywhere. HP and Torque.
2) In my 3 setups, I've run 2 cams a 235/251 (run first on my first setup, and run now on my current setup) on LSL's- producing 554/490 with Chris Frank heads and producing 573/507 with the PRC's. My other cam was a Martin @ Tick special 251/269 .701/.670 on a 114+4 and laid down 570/490 with the CF heads. It was a max effort cam, that was really pretty street friendly for its size. Martin @Tick is the man for cams IMO.
3) I'd pay close attention to valve selection and spring selection for a Max effort. I'd really consider Titanium exhaust valves to go wth your Stock Titanium intakes to keep the events stable.
4) MSD intake w/ a NW 102 seems to be the future for the LS7 intake wise.
1) PRC's out performed the CF heads everywhere. HP and Torque.
2) In my 3 setups, I've run 2 cams a 235/251 (run first on my first setup, and run now on my current setup) on LSL's- producing 554/490 with Chris Frank heads and producing 573/507 with the PRC's. My other cam was a Martin @ Tick special 251/269 .701/.670 on a 114+4 and laid down 570/490 with the CF heads. It was a max effort cam, that was really pretty street friendly for its size. Martin @Tick is the man for cams IMO.
3) I'd pay close attention to valve selection and spring selection for a Max effort. I'd really consider Titanium exhaust valves to go wth your Stock Titanium intakes to keep the events stable.
4) MSD intake w/ a NW 102 seems to be the future for the LS7 intake wise.
Last edited by 427zm; 02-28-2015 at 04:12 PM.
03-01-2015, 12:02 AM
#75
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No I sure haven't used any cams from Randy at Ragin, and I'm not familiar with Raymer.
03-11-2015, 03:49 PM
#76
Me too, thank you
A lot of good info right there. Still in research mode but I have 2 questions.
Why not using AI for porting the stockers? How much did you mill them?
I'll find a way to get to 630whp but it will take every little detail with 93.
I'm on my 2nd LS7 and have had 3 sets of heads on my 2 cars. The first 2 sets of heads were stockers ported by Chris Frank, the third (my current setup) is stockers ported by PRC on their 265 program. What I have learned:
1) PRC's out performed the CF heads everywhere. HP and Torque.
2) In my 3 setups, I've run 2 cams a 235/251 (run first on my first setup, and run now on my current setup) on LSL's- producing 554/490 with Chris Frank heads and producing 573/507 with the PRC's. My other cam was a Martin @ Tick special 251/269 .701/.670 on a 114+4 and laid down 570/490 with the CF heads. It was a max effort cam, that was really pretty street friendly for its size. Martin @Tick is the man for cams IMO.
3) I'd pay close attention to valve selection and spring selection for a Max effort. I'd really consider Titanium exhaust valves to go wth your Stock Titanium intakes to keep the events stable.
4) MSD intake w/ a NW 102 seems to be the future for the LS7 intake wise.
1) PRC's out performed the CF heads everywhere. HP and Torque.
2) In my 3 setups, I've run 2 cams a 235/251 (run first on my first setup, and run now on my current setup) on LSL's- producing 554/490 with Chris Frank heads and producing 573/507 with the PRC's. My other cam was a Martin @ Tick special 251/269 .701/.670 on a 114+4 and laid down 570/490 with the CF heads. It was a max effort cam, that was really pretty street friendly for its size. Martin @Tick is the man for cams IMO.
3) I'd pay close attention to valve selection and spring selection for a Max effort. I'd really consider Titanium exhaust valves to go wth your Stock Titanium intakes to keep the events stable.
4) MSD intake w/ a NW 102 seems to be the future for the LS7 intake wise.
Why not using AI for porting the stockers? How much did you mill them?
I'll find a way to get to 630whp but it will take every little detail with 93.
03-21-2015, 01:42 PM
#78
I'm on my 2nd LS7 and have had 3 sets of heads on my 2 cars. The first 2 sets of heads were stockers ported by Chris Frank, the third (my current setup) is stockers ported by PRC on their 265 program. What I have learned:
1) PRC's out performed the CF heads everywhere. HP and Torque.
1) PRC's out performed the CF heads everywhere. HP and Torque.
