Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Crate LS6 to AI Heads&Cam dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2014, 05:57 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
easy_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Crate LS6 to AI Heads&Cam dyno results

Before numbers BLUE
Crate LS6 405hp spec (05 CTS-V replacement motor)
SLP Lid
Pacesetter Longtubes with TSP catless y pipe
SLP Dual Dual catback
10 bolt (edit M6)
Bryan Herter dyno tune
369rwhp@6000 Dynojet


After numbers RED
+Advanced Induction 243 226cc with 60cc combustion chambers
+Advanced Induction 226/234 630/630 113 cam
+BTR Spring kit (mechanic sourced for me, unsure of exact kit)
+S60 with 4:10
+NicD dyno tune
424rwhp@6400 Dynojet

previous traps were 111mph in AZ (edit 3.8.14 trapped 117 last night in 2100ft DA)should get out soon to the track to see what it runs now. Still has good street manners and once you get to 3500-4K you can really feel the difference.
Attached Thumbnails Crate LS6 to AI Heads&Cam dyno results-dyno.jpg  

Last edited by easy_rider; 03-09-2014 at 09:51 AM. Reason: previous specs
Old 03-07-2014, 10:09 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
whatsa347's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: clear lake, Texas
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

How come you only went to 6k with the ls6 setup?
Old 03-08-2014, 02:53 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
easy_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by whatsa347
How come you only went to 6k with the ls6 setup?
On the street I would spin to 63-6400 rpm just to carry it higher up the torque band on the next shift.

On the new setup I try and spin to 66-6700 with a 6900 fuel cut out.

I was just noting it above more to show it moved roughly 500 rpm up the range for the new peak.
Old 03-08-2014, 05:58 PM
  #4  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

The S60 is eating probably a good 15-20rwhp at least vs the previous 10-bolt. Even still, only adding 55rwhp is pretty weak. That cam should have been good for 40-50rwhp and the heads good for 35 over the stock ones (at least). You should have picked up closer to 85-90rwhp minus the S60. So maybe 70rwhp and around 440-445.

FAST 92 and some TSP 1-7/8s would definitely help pick up a good 15-20rwhp over where you are now.

I bet it drives nice tho.
Old 03-08-2014, 10:50 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
easy_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
The S60 is eating probably a good 15-20rwhp at least vs the previous 10-bolt. Even still, only adding 55rwhp is pretty weak. That cam should have been good for 40-50rwhp and the heads good for 35 over the stock ones (at least). You should have picked up closer to 85-90rwhp minus the S60. So maybe 70rwhp and around 440-445.

FAST 92 and some TSP 1-7/8s would definitely help pick up a good 15-20rwhp over where you are now.

I bet it drives nice tho.
The heads and cam is a used low mile setup that I couldn't pass up. It definitely needs some intake upgrades to really take advantage of the new flow available and optimize it.
Old 03-08-2014, 10:57 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Did I miss if you said this was a 6sp or auto?
Old 03-09-2014, 09:43 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
easy_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Grimes
Did I miss if you said this was a 6sp or auto?
It's a m6. Just noticed the mobile version doesnt show my signature with the trans info so I'll add it .

Last edited by easy_rider; 03-09-2014 at 09:53 AM.
Old 03-09-2014, 10:04 AM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RyderTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those are nice numbers especially with the heavy rear end and a 6mph increase in the traps is damn good! Congrats!
Old 03-09-2014, 12:35 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
easy_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RyderTA
Those are nice numbers especially with the heavy rear end and a 6mph increase in the traps is damn good! Congrats!
Thanks I am stoked! Used to have a CBR600F2 way way back in the day that trapped 113-14 so I am pretty pumped to be faster than my old sport bike.
Old 03-09-2014, 06:35 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
5w20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston , Tx
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
The S60 is eating probably a good 15-20rwhp at least vs the previous 10-bolt. Even still, only adding 55rwhp is pretty weak. That cam should have been good for 40-50rwhp and the heads good for 35 over the stock ones (at least). You should have picked up closer to 85-90rwhp minus the S60. So maybe 70rwhp and around 440-445.

FAST 92 and some TSP 1-7/8s would definitely help pick up a good 15-20rwhp over where you are now.

I bet it drives nice tho.
dyno is probably a lower reading one because 370rwhp for a bolt on ls6 is on the low side. i wouldn't be worried about those numbers, hit the track.



Quick Reply: Crate LS6 to AI Heads&Cam dyno results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.