Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Dyno Results After NEW FAST 92 Install .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2012, 10:53 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
99canadahawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Barrie , Ontairo , Canada
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dyno Results After NEW FAST 92 Install .

So finally had my NEW FAST 92 Installed just the other day along with a NW TB & 160* Stat & dyno`d it yesterday .





Might look into a set of 3:42 Gears or a Cam & Converter for next season
Any thoughts ?

Thanks .
Old 08-11-2012, 11:14 AM
  #2  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

i would have def. done an egr delete.... but looks good man
Old 08-11-2012, 11:21 AM
  #3  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
reeperz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Amarillo Tx
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would like to see the cam results now haha. Any reason for the egr?
Old 08-11-2012, 12:09 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
99canadahawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Barrie , Ontairo , Canada
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys ! as for the EGR , I wanted to keep it Emissions Legal for now until the regulations change , car just litterly squeeked buy the smog test last year LOL .
Old 08-11-2012, 04:45 PM
  #5  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice gains, that intake looks great in the black with red.

Automatic Firehawks all have 3.23's or did some come with 2.73's?
Old 08-11-2012, 05:01 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
transamtom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Niagara Falls Ont. Canada
Posts: 640
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

So 13 HP and 10tq over the stock LS1?

Did you get it tuned as well?
Old 08-11-2012, 05:10 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
senicalj4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,257
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

I see your sig says tuned by champion...was the car tuned before this?
Old 08-11-2012, 08:16 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,676
Received 157 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

wtf.....why does it say mph along the bottum and not engine speed
Old 08-12-2012, 01:49 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (32)
 
02TransAm/Batmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southside Chicago
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I don't like how you lost torque down low. Pretty expensive for 13 horses.
Old 08-12-2012, 02:18 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
usmcpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Was this the first tune that the car ever had? If so, Id attribute the power gains to the tune, not the FAST
Old 08-12-2012, 07:32 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
My6speedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Salisbury, NC
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not bad, your cam gains will be a little bit better in the future. Your car looks sweet too I love Firehawks.
Old 08-12-2012, 07:49 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Blownbayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 653
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

nice gain but I agree with batmobile....... Hate to give up the torq
Old 08-12-2012, 09:33 AM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i'd guess he won't notice that tq loss. consider this graph is recording wide open throttle, not part-throttle. you guys and your torque arguments lol. i'd doubt he notices anything driving around normally. when's the last time any of you did pulls from 2500 rpm in 4th gear? now the car makes the same tq that a completely stock ls1 does, which is obviously more than enough for putting around.

any cam he does in the future will be miles ahead of an ls1 or even ls6 intake.
Old 08-12-2012, 09:39 AM
  #14  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
99canadahawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Barrie , Ontairo , Canada
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScreaminRedZ
Nice gains, that intake looks great in the black with red.

Automatic Firehawks all have 3.23's or did some come with 2.73's?
- Thanks man , Yep 3:23`s just like the WS.6 Auto`s , that`s why the guy`s at shop suggested getting a different set of gears to move the power band .

Originally Posted by transamtom
So 13 HP and 10tq over the stock LS1?

Did you get it tuned as well?
- Yep it was cleand up a little on the dyno , I know 13HP & 10TQ LOL . . but I think between the 3.23 gears & 295 rear tires might have lost a quite a bit , also it was a humid day my tuner said not too expect too see a huge difference because there is more water than air in the air & the car might be making more power but its just not going to show on the dyno .

Originally Posted by senicalj4579
I see your sig says tuned by champion...was
the car tuned before this?
- Yep car was previously tuned last year when I had headers installed I just had it cleaned up , made a huge difference in drivabillity .

Originally Posted by Floorman279
wtf.....why does it say mph along the bottum and not engine speed
- I noticed that my self the car was pulled 4 times on the dyno it`s just the sheet I ended up getteing .

Last edited by 99canadahawk; 08-12-2012 at 09:46 AM.
Old 08-12-2012, 09:47 AM
  #15  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
senicalj4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,257
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

alright so that is a good gain. I wouldnt expect that much on a stock internal car. ****, I wonder how much my 92mm fast was actually worth along with the heads and cam I just did. I sure as hell dont believe it was much more than 5 rwhp over my old ls6 intake.

Oh I just noticed you are a 99 so was this going from ls1 intake? If so then thats why the gains are so high. Good gains on your car anyways
Old 08-12-2012, 09:52 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
99canadahawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Barrie , Ontairo , Canada
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by senicalj4579
alright so that is a good gain. I wouldnt expect that much on a stock internal car. ****, I wonder how much my 92mm fast was actually worth along with the heads and cam I just did. I sure as hell dont believe it was much more than 5 rwhp over my old ls6 intake.

Oh I just noticed you are a 99 so was this going from ls1 intake? If so then thats why the gains are so high. Good gains on your car anyways
Thanks senical , yep orignally had the LS1 intake , BTW how did you get the SLP bellow to fit ? I tried to trim mine down but could`nt get it to fit right , ended up using the stock one .

- So after all this do I gear & stall the stock 10 Bolt ?
- Or do stall & cam ?

Last edited by 99canadahawk; 08-12-2012 at 10:01 AM.
Old 08-12-2012, 10:14 AM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
senicalj4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,257
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99canadahawk
Thanks senical , yep orignally had the LS1 intake , BTW how did you get the SLP bellow to fit ? I tried to trim mine down but could`nt get it to fit right , ended up using the stock one .

- So after all this do I gear & stall the stock 10 Bolt ?
- Or do stall & cam ?
Yep good gains.
Slp bellow over the tb? Well mine is nw 92mm tb and zo6 85mm maf and it fits. It dosent slide on very easy so it have to be stretched somewhat but I like it. Fits like skin on the hand.

Just realized you might be talking about the length of the setup? It all fits great for mine...92mm fast, nw 92mm tb, slp smooth bellow, zo6 85mm maf, ftp 98mm lid. No cutting down or anything.

I would do everything and be done. Throw some heads in there to!
Old 08-12-2012, 10:52 AM
  #18  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by s346k
i'd guess he won't notice that tq loss. consider this graph is recording wide open throttle, not part-throttle. you guys and your torque arguments lol. i'd doubt he notices anything driving around normally. when's the last time any of you did pulls from 2500 rpm in 4th gear? now the car makes the same tq that a completely stock ls1 does, which is obviously more than enough for putting around.

any cam he does in the future will be miles ahead of an ls1 or even ls6 intake.
I was thinking almost exactly the same thing.

Originally Posted by 99canadahawk
- Thanks man , Yep 3:23`s just like the WS.6 Auto`s , that`s why the guy`s at shop suggested getting a different set of gears to move the power band .
I doubt you'd even notice the different with 3.42's. Cam/converter is the way to go in my opinion
Old 08-12-2012, 11:05 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
My6speedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Salisbury, NC
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by s346k
you guys and your torque arguments lol. i'd doubt he notices anything driving around normally. when's the last time any of you did pulls from 2500 rpm in 4th gear?

Originally Posted by ScreaminRedZ
I was thinking almost exactly the same thing.

Kind of like the 1 7/8 naysayers that talk about the loss you'll see on a stock cubes below 3000 rpms. I think people read to many dyno graphs and forget where our motors actually live when we drive them hard.
Old 08-13-2012, 03:51 AM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (32)
 
02TransAm/Batmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southside Chicago
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by s346k
i'd guess he won't notice that tq loss. consider this graph is recording wide open throttle, not part-throttle. you guys and your torque arguments lol. i'd doubt he notices anything driving around normally. when's the last time any of you did pulls from 2500 rpm in 4th gear? now the car makes the same tq that a completely stock ls1 does, which is obviously more than enough for putting around.

any cam he does in the future will be miles ahead of an ls1 or even ls6 intake.
I DEFINITELY feel less torque when I had my cut-out open. When closed, even though it didn't scream up top, I noticed increased "torqueness". I'm sure on a dyno, the difference between open and closed would be abysmal.


Quick Reply: Dyno Results After NEW FAST 92 Install .



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.