Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Dyno Results - H/C 1998 LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2017, 07:22 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
33dogstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dyno Results - H/C 1998 LS1

Just got tuned on the dyno today, I have a 1998 LS1/T56 that I just put on 243s, a TSP Torquer V4, headers, and a CAI (motor is in a 68 Chevelle).

The dyno sheet said I made around 315hp/315tq, which seems pretty low to me. I know all dynos are different, but I was still pretty disappointed with the numbers considering the amount of money I put in it. Are there any common problems I should be addressing or was it just a stingy dyno?
Old 08-23-2017, 07:27 PM
  #2  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
soloman369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: League city, Tx
Posts: 544
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Ugh that horrible no matter what dyno.... Got the sheet post a picture
Old 08-23-2017, 07:34 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
33dogstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's the sheet
Attached Thumbnails Dyno Results - H/C 1998 LS1-dyno2.jpg  
Old 08-23-2017, 07:43 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

That's messed up. It looks like your horsepower is peaking around 5700 as well. Should be more like 6200
Old 08-23-2017, 08:09 PM
  #5  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,850 Likes on 1,151 Posts

Default

Check that cam timing. Looks advanced
Old 08-23-2017, 08:59 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
33dogstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Check that cam timing. Looks advanced
Check the timing as in if the dot-to-dot is off?
Old 08-23-2017, 09:38 PM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,850 Likes on 1,151 Posts

Default

Yes. As in dot to dot. It's easy to be off a tooth
Old 08-23-2017, 10:07 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
soloman369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: League city, Tx
Posts: 544
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Yeah it looks like it's peaking early, but also looks like a little bit of float what kind of springs do you have in it?
Old 08-24-2017, 12:00 AM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
33dogstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Yes. As in dot to dot. It's easy to be off a tooth
I'll check that out, thanks for the tip.

Originally Posted by soloman369
Yeah it looks like it's peaking early, but also looks like a little bit of float what kind of springs do you have in it?
PAC .660 dual springs.
Old 08-25-2017, 09:20 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Please post your full specs to help rule things out.

What kind of air filter/ MAF/ tubing assembly?
What intake manifold? What throttle body?
What size headers? What exhaust after the headers?

Did the dyno operator do the pull in 4th gear or did he use a lower gear (common if he was concerned about the length of the driveshaft versus it's build quality)?


Hard to imagine your car making less than 370rwhp on the stingiest dyno assuming there are no mechanical issues. Should be 400+ pretty easily.
Old 08-25-2017, 10:42 AM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
33dogstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
Please post your full specs to help rule things out.

What kind of air filter/ MAF/ tubing assembly?
What intake manifold? What throttle body?
What size headers? What exhaust after the headers?

Did the dyno operator do the pull in 4th gear or did he use a lower gear (common if he was concerned about the length of the driveshaft versus it's build quality)?


Hard to imagine your car making less than 370rwhp on the stingiest dyno assuming there are no mechanical issues. Should be 400+ pretty easily.
The air intake is a Spectre LS swap intake (P/N 901234) with a card style MAF. Intake manifold and throttle body are stock LS1. Headers are LTs from Speed Engineering, 1 3/4" primaries. The dyno run was performed on headers only with an extension tube for the O2s. The operator performed the pull in 4th.

Here's some other info about my setup to rule anything out. The 243s have stock LS2 valves with new retainers, seats, and seals. I am running 7.400 TSP chromoly pushrods and stock lifters. The timing chain and upper sprocket are new, as is the oil pump. Stock fuel injectors and fuel rail.

Another thing a friend brought up that might affect the numbers could have been altitude. I don't believe the numbers were corrected and I am located in Colorado Springs (elevation 6035).
Old 08-25-2017, 11:28 AM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 33dogstreet
Another thing a friend brought up that might affect the numbers could have been altitude. I don't believe the numbers were corrected and I am located in Colorado Springs (elevation 6035).

That would certainly do it. The elevation equates to about a 60hp loss based on a calculator from Wallace Racing.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/braking-hp.php



That would put you back up to 375hp which is still low but not out of the ballpark. Could be stingy numbers at that point or other weather factors. Or just minor tune/combo tweaks needed to fully optimize the car.

The most major one I see being the LS1 intake which is garbage for a cammed car and is likely the primary contributor to the low HP peak. A friend of mine had a 228r cammed LS1 in his Chevelle and the switch to a LS6 intake gained him 2 tenths and 2mph in the 1/8 mile. A Fast would gain another 10+ over that.

Ricer math can add you up to over 400rwhp so I wouldn't be overly concerned but maybe someone else with more experience with high altitude can chime in and further shed some light for us before you start looking for major issues or throwing money at it.
Old 08-25-2017, 11:32 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,801
Received 200 Likes on 141 Posts

Default

well there lies your problem...High DA combined with the dismal LS1 intake, mediocre headers, and the rear end is probably what a 12 bolt minimum? So yea your numbers make sense.

Check your cam timing, move up to set of 1 7/8 headers, LS6 intake & ported TB minimum(Fast would be better), measure for correct push rod length instead of using the standard 7.4 and I bet you pick up 40-50hp even @ 6000+ ft.
Old 08-26-2017, 03:07 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

what transmission is in this car? i seen you said pulls were made in 4th gear, if this is an automatic, that will also drop numbers
Old 08-29-2017, 10:25 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
mOtOrHeAd MiKe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa Ontario, Canada - where arguing "DA" is for the slow and weak...
Posts: 1,129
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Yes. As in dot to dot. It's easy to be off a tooth
While I agree it can happen, torque is still peaking between 4800 and 5000 rpm which is ballpark for the cam. If it was showing 4400rpm peak I'd be more suspect.

It is dying up top and falling short by about 500rpm. That is likely a hole in the tune and the intake choking it.



Quick Reply: Dyno Results - H/C 1998 LS1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.