Vette + F-15 cam only. Vids :)
04-22-2005, 08:17 AM
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vette + F-15 cam only. Vids :) Cam is ground on a 236/239 .600/.611 112 +2
Still have the Stock TB and no underdrive pulley, through the Vette drivetrain.
http://kraest.com/vette/dyno.mpg
http://kraest.com/vette/idle.mpg
http://kraest.com/vette/parking.mpg
Mike
Still have the Stock TB and no underdrive pulley, through the Vette drivetrain.
http://kraest.com/vette/dyno.mpg
http://kraest.com/vette/idle.mpg
http://kraest.com/vette/parking.mpg
Mike
04-22-2005, 04:50 PM
#5
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Futral Motorsports
Mike,you need me to post the graph?
Still trying to figure out why the graph doesn't hit 400, but the numbers are 411.6x and 378.x .. Corrected numbers? I witnessed the 412.x pull, but I don't have that graph.Mike
Trending Topics
04-23-2005, 07:02 PM
#8
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Futral Motorsports
No prob Mike. It dosen't print the graph line correctly.
Just for you Gomer F15 12+2
Just for you Gomer F15 12+2
You know that's the way that cam was meant to be!! Forget that 108 and lower ICL stuff. I'm going to use mine in another car I'm building and I'm going to install it on a 112icl. I wish the one I had was a 112lsa instead of a 110 though
04-26-2005, 12:04 PM
#14
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BADSZ28
Why would you want 112 over 110? Nitrous? Wouldn't the 110 give a better torque curve and under the curve power?
04-26-2005, 01:37 PM
#15
Originally Posted by gomer
It would peak earlier and fall off quicker on a 110. Peak torque would still be at the same RPM, you'd just have a shorter powerband with a 110 over a 112... no advantage at all in my eyes.
04-26-2005, 03:16 PM
#18
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Futral Motorsports
Hmmm..Really have to disagree on this on. For the dyno warriors this might be true,but for best ET's this isn't the best way. All depends on the PROPER use of the cam.
One day when I have some free time (if it ever happens again) I'm going to do some back to back advancing and retarding testing... on the dyno.Here's my F15 stock headed graph that's on a 110lsa 107 or 106 icl... I can't rember which right now. Compare the power of it at a 6700rpm vs. the 110icl cam above.
04-26-2005, 04:44 PM
#19
Here is the graph of where we tested the cam for final specs. This is normal of setups with this cam,and they pull on out.
12-bolt\4.10 gears,LS6 intake,ported stock T\B,Pacesetter headers w\dual x-pipe.
12-bolt\4.10 gears,LS6 intake,ported stock T\B,Pacesetter headers w\dual x-pipe.
04-26-2005, 05:14 PM
#20
Originally Posted by Futral Motorsports
Here is the graph of where we tested the cam for final specs. This is normal of setups with this cam,and they pull on out.
12-bolt\4.10 gears,LS6 intake,ported stock T\B,Pacesetter headers w\dual x-pipe.
12-bolt\4.10 gears,LS6 intake,ported stock T\B,Pacesetter headers w\dual x-pipe.